Exploring Misclassification Status of Platform Workers in Malaysia for Enhanced Employment Protections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.5Keywords:
Labour law, platform workers, misclassification of employment status, purposive approach, statutory testAbstract
The misclassification of platform workers as independent contractors has sparked extensive debates globally, with notable implications for employment protections. In Malaysia, the classification of platform workers, as exemplified in Loh Guet Ching v Menteri Sumber Manusia & Anor case, remains a contentious issue. Despite the Court of Appeal's ruling, Section 101C of the Employment Act 1955, in force since 1st January 2023, introduces a mechanism to ascertain employment status. This provision, untested as of yet, presents a potential resolution for misclassification disputes involving platform workers. This article delves into the current employment legal landscape in Malaysia, exploring recent developments and potential solutions for resolving the misclassification dilemma. Utilising a doctrinal approach, the study analyses both legal and non-legal sources, revealing that selected jurisdictions have adeptly addressed misclassification challenges. Common law tests, which are prevalent in judicial proceedings, and the purposive approach offer avenues for resolution, while statutory tests, though providing clarity, require careful application due to potential adverse consequences.
References
Abd Samad, K., Abd Rahman, N. H., Ismail, S., & Marmaya, N. H. (2023). Is the well-being of gig workers in Malaysia better? The reality of pain and gain. International Review of Applied Economics, 37(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2023.2240243
Abdul Rahim, A. F., Mohd Noor, R., Najid, N. A. & Zulkifli, N. (2021). Strengthening the gig economy: Future of digital labor workforce platform post-covid 19. Gading Journal for Social Sciences, 24(4), 17-26.
Abdul Rani, A. H. (2023, November 11). Online interview. Timbalan Presiden Persatuan Penghantar PHailing Malaysia (PENGHANTAR), Google meet.
Ahmad, N. (2020). Gig economy: The future of working. International Journal of Communication, Management and Humanities, 1(2), 45-56.
Aloisi, A. & De Stefano, V. (2020). Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator. International Labour Review, 159(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12160 Amita Gupta v. Portier Pacific Pty Ltd; Uber Australia Pty Ltd t/a Uber Eats [2020] FWCFB 1698.
Anbalagan, V. (2023, November 27). E-hailing drivers not employees, court reaffirms. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/11/27/court-of-appeal-affir ms-that-e-hailing-drivers-are-not-employees/ Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41: [2011] ICR 1157.
Aziz, I. H. (2021, September 20). Bantu pekerja e-haling, p-hailing. Berita Harian Online. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2021/09/866374/bantu-pekerja-e-haling-p-hailing Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2014] UKSC 32; [2014] 1 WLR 2047.
Buana, M. S., & Budiman, R. (2022). Indonesia’s minimum wage policy after the omnibus law: A comparative analysis from Islamic principles. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 187-214. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.8 Byrne Bros (Formwork) Ltd v Bairs [2002] ICR 667.
Chan, D., Voortman, F., & Rogers, S. (2019, January). The rise of platform economy. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/humancapital/deloitte-nl-hc-the-rise-of-the-platform-economy-report.pdf
Collins, H., Ewing, K. D. & McColgan. (2019). Labour law. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v. Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1.
Countouris, N. (2007). The changing law of the employment relationship: Comparative analyses in the European context. Ashgate Publishing.
Davidov, G. & Alon-Shenker, P. (2022). The ABC test: A model for employment status determination? Industrial Law Journal, 51(2), 235-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac004
Davidov, G. (2005). Who is a worker? Industrial Law Journal, 34(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/ 34.1.57
De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 1-51.
Deakin, S. & Wilkinson, F. (1998, June). Labour law and economic theory: A reappraisal (Working Paper No. 92). ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2020). Gig workers in Malaysia: A review of definitions and estimation. DOSM Newsletter. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/uploads/files/6_Newsletter/ Newsletter%202020/DOSM_MBLS_1-2020_Series-8.pd
Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2013). Gerbang kata. http://ekamus.dbp.gov.my/searchIstilah.aspx Diego Franco v Deliveroo Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FWC 2818.
Doherty. M. & Franca, V. (2020). Solving the gig-saw? Collective rights and platform work. Industrial Law Journal, 49(3), 352-376. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwz026
Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles (2018) 4 Cal. 5th 903.
Ewing, K. (2023, December 13). Judicial backpedalling on trade union rights in the gig economy: Deliveroo in the United Kingdom Supreme Court. Institute of Employment Rights. https://www.ier.org.uk/comments/judicial-backpedalling-on-trade-union-rights-in-the-gig-economy/# :~:text=Not%20only%20are%20Deliveroo%20riders,not%20conferred%20on%20the%20ride rs'
Goh, E. (2022, August 30). Responses to delivery riders missing the bigger picture. The Centre. https://www.centre.my/post/responses-to-delivery-riders-missing-the-bigger-picture
Grab.com. (n.d.). Terms of service: Transport, delivery and logistics. https://www.grab.com/my/ termspolicies/transport-delivery-logistics/
Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21.
House of Representatives. (2020, August 11). Official statement of Parliament: Second meeting 14th Parliament term, no. 18. (M. Saravanan). Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) v Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) [2023] UKSC 43.
Institut Maklumat dan Analisis Pasaran Buruh (ILMIA). (2022). Kajian mengenai isu perundangan perburuhan, perhubungan perusahaan dan perlindungan sosial. ILMIA: Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. https://www.ilmia.gov.my/index.php/en/component/zoo/item/article-kajian-gig-2022
Jais, A. S. & Marzuki, A. (2020). E-hailing services in Malaysia: Current practices and future outlook planning Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 18(3), 128-141.
Johnston, H. & Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2018). Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice and collective bargaining in the gig economy. Conditions of work and employment series No. 94, ILO Office, Geneva.
Justin, O. (2020, January 4). In possible test case, former Grab driver reports firm for unfair dismissal. MalayMail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2020/01/04/in-possible-test-case-formergrab-driver-reports-firm-for-unfair-dismissal/1824561
Katsabian, T. & Davidov. G. (2023). Flexibility, choice, and labour law: The challenge of on-demand platforms. University of Toronto Law Journal, 73(3), 348-379. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2021-0113
Lalamove.com. (n.d.). Terms & conditions. https://www.lalamove.com/ en-my/terms-and-conditions
Lattova, S. (2021). Online platforms and “dependent work” after Uber. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 15(2), 197-223. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2021-2-3 Loh Guet Ching v Minister of Human Resources & Anor [2022] 1 LNS 2388. McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP 2014 SCC 39: [2014] 2 SCR 108.
McCrystal, S. (2014). Collective bargaining beyond the boundaries of employment: A comparative analysis. Melbourne University Law Review, 37(3), 662-698.
Md Radzi, M. S. N., Bidin, A., Musa, M. K., & Hamid, N. A. (2022). Protecting gig workers’ interests in Malaysia through registered association under Societies Act 1966. IIUM Law Journal, 30(SI), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30iS1.702
Mrspeedy.my. (n.d.). Terms & Conditions for MrSpeedy Malaysia. https://mrspeedy.my/terms-and-conditions
Nasrin, K. & Abu Yusuf, M. (2023). Gig workers and platform economy: Benefits, challenges and the way forward. The Cost and Management, 51(3), 35-43.
Piasna, A., Zwysen, W. & Drahokoupil, J. (2022). The platform economy in Europe: Results from the second ETUI Internet and platform work survey. Working Paper 2022.05.
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Anor v Smith [2018] UKSC 29.
Pittard, M. (2021). Delivering employment status - Fair work commission reinstates unfairly dismissed gig worker. Employment Law Bulletin, 26(4), 38-42.
Rawling, M. (2021, January). Proposals for legal protections of on-demand gig workers in the road transport industry. UTS Law Faculty.
Rider.foodpanda.my. (n.d.). Privacy Policy MY. https://rider.foodpanda. my/privacy-policy-my/
Statista.com. (2023). Ride-hailing – Malaysia. October. https://www.statista.com/outlook/mmo/ shared-mobility/shared-rides/ride-hailing/malaysia#analyst-opinion
Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Pty Ltd (1986) 63 ALR 513.
Stewart, A. & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420-437.
Stewart, A. (2021). Stewart's Guide to Employment Law (7th ed.). Sydney: The Federation Press.
Sylvia, J. K. (2023, March 20). Insights you can contract if you want to: California appellate court leaves prop 22 largely intact. Baker & Hostetler. https://www. bakerlaw.com/insights/you-can-contract-if-you-want-to-california-appellate-court-leaves-prop -22-largely-intact/
Tan, Z. G. & Gong, R. (2021). Digital platform work. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute. Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5.
Wahab, H. A., Razak, S. S. A., & Mahmod, N. A. K. N. (2022). Legal issues in working from home amid COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.7
Wong, K. C., Lim, R. K. Y., & Sidhu, S. (2022, April 22). Gig workers in Malaysia: Protection under New Law? Zul Rafique & Partners. https://www.zulrafique.com.my/article-sample.php?id= 1975 WorkPac Pty Ltd v. Rossato [2021] HCA 23.
World Bank Group. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/816281518818814423/2019-WDR-Report.pdf ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v. Jamsek [2022] HCA 2.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UUM Journal of Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
