Alternative Approaches in Handling Child Offenders: A Case Study of Community-Based Diversion Programmes in Malaysia

Authors

  • Siti Balqis Mohd Azam Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UNISZA), Malaysia
  • Siti Hajar Abu Bakar Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Jal Zabdi Mohd Yusoff Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Syarifah Maisarah Syed Alwi Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.10

Keywords:

Diversion, community-based programme, child offenders, bond of good behaviour, criminal justice system

Abstract

Diversion is the best approach to rehabilitate child offenders; however, children arrested for criminal offences in Malaysia must adhere to the procedures in the Child Act 2001. Although no specific diversion programme exists for child offenders in Malaysia, the Malaysian government is working on a project that is a community-based initiative with some elements of diversion practice to manage children in conflict with the law. The study examines the pilot community-based rehabilitation practices to fulfil the initiative as a formal diversion programme for child offenders in Malaysia. The study is crucial to convince child welfare agencies that the pilot community-based initiatives could be developed as a comprehensive diversion module for managing child offenders in Malaysia. This study employed in-depth interview techniques to gather qualitative data. The sample included nine child offenders, eight practitioners, and three parents/caregivers. Manual coding was utilised to facilitate the organisation, analysis, and interpretation of the data efficiently. The findings revealed that Malaysia's juvenile justice system has actively engaged community agents—aligning with UNICEF’s recommendations—through family engagement, community mobilisation, and supervision efforts. Nevertheless, the study identified a pressing need to further strengthen the role of these community agents, particularly in preparing for the implementation of formal diversion programmes. In light of these findings, the researcher proposed the development of a comprehensive diversion module to guide the management of child offenders, which could serve as a framework for establishing a formal diversion system within Malaysia’s juvenile justice context.

Author Biographies

  • Siti Hajar Abu Bakar, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya

    Professor in Department of Social Administration & Justice, Faculty of Art & Social Sciences, University Malaya

  • Jal Zabdi Mohd Yusoff, Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya

    Associate Professor Dr in  Faculty of Law, University Malaya

  • Syarifah Maisarah Syed Alwi, Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya

    PhD candidate, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya

References

A Child v Public Prosecutor, [2020] CLJU 2113. A Juvenile v Public Prosecutor, [2002] MLJU 471.

Ahmad Waseem Dhihny, Y., & Adi Aizat, Y. (2014, 10-11 September). The necessity of diversion of juvenile offenders from the criminal justice system in Malaysia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Law, Policy and Social Justice, Malaysia.

Akashi, F. (2018). The role of volunteer probation officers in Japan - Recent challenges and responses. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 54, 212-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijlcj.2018.03.006

Akashi, F., & Watanabe, H. (2016). Volunteer probation officer in Japan & Asean countries. https://www.iccalive.org/icca/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Hiroyuki-Watanabe-Volunteer-Pro bation-Officers-in-Japan.pdf

Amankwaa, L. (2020). Creating protocols for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 27(3), 68–72.

Ambrose, M. A., & Rosky, J. W. (2013). Prisoners' round: Examining the literature on recreation and exercise in correctional facilities. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 362-370. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.34

Aminuddin, M. (2016). Rights of children in criminal proceedings: A comparative analysis on the compatibility of the Malaysian juvenile justice system with the standards of the Convention on Rights of Children (CRC). [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Lancaster.

Andrews, P. L. (2018). Children in conflict with the law: Is there a basis for a rights-based argument for diversion in Malaysia? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lancaster University. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/131483/

Asmawati, D., Fatimah, Y., Zainah, A. Z., Nor Ba’yah, A. K., & Mohd Norahim, M. S. (2015). Kemahiran keibubapaan, kefungsian keluarga dan kesejahteraan psikologi dalam kalangan ibubapa. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 29(2), 32-42.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2020). Youth justice in Australia 2018-19 (Cat. no: JUV 132). https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/a5a364b9-fe69-4d02-9c93-1965a69a3d93/aihw-juv-132.pdf.aspx?inline=true

Australian Law Reform Commission. (2019). Community-based Sentences. https://www.alrc.gov.au/ wpcontent/uploads/2019/08/fr133_07._community_based_sentences.pdf

Boccio, C. M., & Beaver, K. M. (2019). The influence of family structure on delinquent behavior. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(1), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204017727836

Bouchard, J. & Wong, J. S. (2018). Examining the effects of intensive supervision and aftercare programs for at-risk youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(6), 1509-1534. https://doi.10.1177/ 0306624X17690449

Celinska, K. (2017). Effectiveness of functional family therapy for mandated versus non-mandated youth. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 17-27. https://doi.10.1111/jfcj.12049

Celinska, K., Sung, H., Kim, C., & Valdimarsdottir, M. (2018). An outcome evaluation of functional family therapy for court-involved youth. Journal of Family Therapy, 1-26. https://doi.org/10. 1111/1467-6427.12224

Center for Urban and Regional Affairs. (2017). Effective components of community-based programming for justice-involved youth and recidivism analysis of the GROW program. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/194765/KNCBR%201433.pdf?sequence =1&isAllowed=y

Child Act 2001. (2021). Act 611. (2018 ed). Law of Malaysia. http://www.agc.gov.my/agcportal/ uploads/files/Publications/LOM/MY/Akta%20611%20-%2027%202%202018.pdf

Children and Justice Legislation Amendment (Youth Justice Reform) Act 2017 (Vic.)

Children, Youth and Families Act 2005(Vic.)

Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice. (2007). Convention on the rights of the child in Geneva. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/CRC.C.GC.10.pdf

Clark, H. C., & Mathur, S. R. (2014). Community engagement for reentry success of youth from juvenile justice: Challenges and opportunities. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 713-734. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0034

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publication.

Cushing, K. (2014). Diversion from prosecution for young people in England and Wales-Reconsidering the mandatory admission criteria. Youth Justice, 14(2), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1473225414537568

De Vries, S. L. A., Hoeve, M., Assink, M., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Asscher, J. J. (2015). Practitioner review: Effective ingredients of prevention programs for youth at risk of persistent juvenile delinquency - recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(2), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12320

Dean, J. (2018). The use of diversion in juvenile justice setting in Australia: With particular focus on the state of Victoria. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. http://icjr.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Use-of-Diversion-in-Juvenile-Justice-Settings-in-Australia.pdf

Dent, A. L., & Pappas, L. N. (2021). The 40-year debate: A meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z

Department of Social Welfare Malaysia. (2017). Interactive Workshop. https://www.jkm.gov.my/jkm/ index.php?r=portal/left&id=UVNERloyOFVxNG9QR0xRaC9hRlB4UT09

Department of Social Welfare Malaysia. (2023). Statistics Report 2022. https://www.jkm.gov.my/

Development Services Group. (2014). Alternatives to detention and confinement. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/AlternativesTo DetentionandConfinement. pdf

Development Services Group. (2017). Diversion from formal juvenile court processing. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/ Diversion_Programs.pdf

Dopp, A. R. (2016). Family-based treatments for serious juvenile offenders: A multilevel meta-analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri. E v. Public Prosecutor [2010] MLJU 1992.

Ekman, K. L. (2015). The state of juvenile justice in Singapore. In Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights & Humanitarian Law. A measure of last resort? The current status of juvenile justice in ASEAN Member States. https://rwi.lu.se/measure_of_last_resort.pdf

Farrell, J., Betsinger, A., & Hammond, P. (2018). Best practices in youth diversion: Literature review for the Baltimore City Youth Diversion Committee. The Institute for Innovation & Implementation University of Maryland School of Social Work. https://theinstitute.umaryland. edu/media/ssw/institute/md-center-documents/Youth-Diversion-Literature-Review.pdf

Gan, D. Z. Q., Zhou, Y., Hoo, E. C. C., Chong, D., & Chu, C. M. (2018). The implementation of functional family therapy (FFT) as an intervention for youth probationers in Singapore. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12353

Gill, C. (2016). Community interventions. In What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: Lessons from systematic reviews (pp. 77-109). Springer.

Gomera, G. L. (2021). Juvenile offenders and pre-trial diversion officers’ experiences and challenges of the pre-trial diversion program: A case study of Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of South Africa. Hamzi Amni bin Zamali v Public Prosecutor and other appeals [2012] MLJU 909.

Hillege, S. L., Brand, E. F. J. M., Mulder, E. A., Vermeiren, R. J. M., & van Domburgh, L. (2017). Serious juvenile offenders: Classification into subgroups based on static and dynamic characteristics. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 11(67), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-017-0201-4

Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

Indiran, R., & Sridevi, A. N. (2017). Effect of family factors on juvenile delinquency. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 4(6), 2079-2082. https://doi.10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp 20174735

Intan, H. M. K. (2015). The state of juvenile justice in Brunei Darussalam. In Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights & Humanitarian Law. A measure of last resort? The current status of juvenile justice in ASEAN Member States. https://rwi.lu.se/measure_of_last_resort.pdf

Jackson, K., Christopher, O., & Penkoff, K. (2019). NDTAC issue brief: Family involvement (2nd ed.). American Institutes for Research, National Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Neglected or Delinquent Children and Youth. https://ridegms.blob.core.windows.net/ documentlibrary/4A55F0AA-F3C1-48A1-A783-065F799B4CC4.pdf

Jacobs, L. A., & Skeem, J. L. (2021). Neighborhood risk factors for recidivism: For whom do they matter? American Journal of Community Psychology, 67(1-2), 103-115.

Jal Zabdi, M. Y., & Zulazhar, T. (2005). AKK 2001: Penguatkuasaan semula tugas dan tanggungjawab ibubapa atau penjaga. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law. http://www.commonlii. org/my/journals/JMCL/2005/6.htm

Kamsiah. A. (2012). Constructing juvenile delinquency: An analysis of news media coverage and government response to youth crime in Malaysia. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New South Wales.

Karam, E. A., Sterrett, E. M., & Kiaer, L. (2017). The integration of family and group therapy as an alternative to juvenile incarceration: A quasi-experimental evaluation using parenting with love and limits. Family Process, 6(2), 331-347. https://doi.10.1111/famp.12187

Kato, S. (2018). Probation in Japan: Engaging the community. Irish Probation Journal, 15, 114-136. Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat & Institut Sosial Malaysia. (2016). Kajian aplikasi pemetaan jenayah dalam kalangan juvana di Semenanjung Malaysia menggunakan Sistem Maklumat Geografi (GIS). https://anyflip.com/zxfr/gicd/basic

Kollmann, S. (2018). Parents as partners: Family connection and youth incarceration. (Community Safety & The Future of Illinois’ Youth Prisons, No. 2), Children and Family Justice Center.

Loeb, R. C., Waung, M., & Sheeran, M. (2015). Individual and familial variables for predicting successful completion of a juvenile justice diversion program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(3), 212-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1023482

Low, S. K., Tan, S. A., Nainee, S., Viapude, G. N., & Kailsan, K. (2018). The association of parental monitoring and peer rejection on antisocial behavior among Malaysian juvenile offenders. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 35(2), 155-171.

Magidson, M., & Kidd, T. (2021). How youth and parents experience diversion programming. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211013854

Manjaria, B. S. (2009). Crime and theories of punishment. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/ 10603/45012/9/09_chapter%204.pdf

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Policy and Data. (2019). Improving access to diversion and community-based interventions for justice involved youth. https://www.mass.gov/doc/improving-access-to-diversion-and-community-based-interventions-for-justice-involved-youth-0/download

Mathur, S. R., & Clark, H. G. (2014). Community engagement for reentry success of youth from juvenile justice: Challenges and opportunities. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 713-734.

McCarthy, P., Schiraldi, V., & Shark, M. (2016). The future of youth justice: A community-based alternative to the youth prison model. Harvard Kennedy School & National Institute of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250142.pdf

McKay, T., Lindquist, C., Pecos Melton, A., & Martinez, R. (2014). Parent and family involvement with youth in the tribal juvenile justice system: Perspectives from OJJDP’s tribal green reentry initiative. RTI International. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/parent-and-family-involvement-youth-tribal-juvenile-justice-system

Mears, D. P., Joshua, J. K., Andrea, M. L., Sonja, E. S., George, B. P., Mark, A. G., & Thomas, G. B. (2016). Juvenile court and contemporary diversion: Helpful, harmful, or both? Criminology and Public Policy, 15(3), 953-981. https://doi.10.1111/1745-9133.12223

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Juvenile Justice Diversion Workgroup. https://www.michigan.gov/media/Project/Websites/mdhhs/Folder3/Folder90/Folder2/Folder /Folder1/Folder290/Section7102PA166of2020.pdf?rev=a68ff6d8716148d48c919c2b20e739b5

Miller, W. T., Campbell, C. A., Papp, J., & Ruhland, E. (2021). The contribution of static and dynamic factors to recidivism prediction for black and white youth offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624 X211022673

Ming-Li H., Hafoka, M., Youngki, W., van Wormer J., Stohr, M. K., & Hemmens, C. (2015). Probation officer roles: A statutory analysis. Federal Probation, 79(3), 20-37.

Ministry of Social and Family Development. (2017). Probation and community rehabilitation service: Annual report 2016. https://www.msf.gov.sg/research-and-data/Research-and-DataSeries/ Documents/Probation%20and%20Community%20Rehabilitation%20Service%20Annual%20 Report%202016.pdf

Ministry of Social and Family Development. (2020). Probation and community rehabilitation service: Annual report 2020. https://www.msf.gov.sg/policies/Rehabilitation-of-Offenders/Comm unity-basedRehabilitation/ProbationOrder/Documents/PCRS%202020%20Annual%20Report. pdf Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development & The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2013). The Malaysian juvenile justice system: A study of mechanisms for handling children in conflict with the law. http://www.iccwtnispcanarc.org/upload/pdf/1672867150 Malaysian%20Juvenile %20Justice%20System.pdf

Models for Change. (2011). Juvenile diversion guidebook. Models for change: Systems reform in juvenile justice. http://www.modelsforchange.net/publications/301

Mohd Hanis Mohd Nasir & Anor v Public Prosecutor [2016] 6 CLJ 457.

Mohd Lazim. (2019). Program pengalihan pesalah kanak-kanak bermula Ogos depan. Kosmo! https://www.kosmo.com.my/negara/program-pengalihan-pesalah-kanak-kanak-bermula-ogos-depan-1.845644 Muhammad Afiq bin Rosnizam v Public Prosecutor [2015] CLJU 852.

Nadzriah, A., Abdul Ghafur, H., & Soadah, W. (2020). Protection of child offenders at the pre-trial process in Malaysia: Are we doing enough? Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(SI3), 285-288. https://10.21834/ebpj.v5iSI3.2571

Narkvichetr, K. (2018). Community involvement in the Thai probation system. Department of Probation Ministry of Justice, Thailand. https://www.cep-probation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ WC2New-Community-Involvement-Thailand.pdf

National Anti-Drugs Agency. (2011). AADK 2011 Annual Report Book. https://www.adk.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/Tahun-2011.pdf

Nong, S. N. A. S., & Yusoff, J. Z. M. (2019). Rehabilitation of children beyond control in Malaysia: Towards deinstitutionalization. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 449–459.

Norshamimi, M. M., & Aminuddin, M. (2022). The Malaysian juvenile justice system: The compelling need to implement diversion in handling the issue of juvenile delinquency. International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review, 4(1), 16-23.

Novaković, P., Palušková, H., & Schardt, M. A. (2021). Exploring pathways for multi-stakeholder engagement for the consolidation of the juvenile justice system in Albania. Regional Academy on the United Nation. http://www.ra-un.org/uploads/4/7/5/4/47544571/osce_exploring_ pathways_for_multi-stakeholder_engagement.pdf

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2020). A whole-of-society approach to preventing and countering violent extremism and radicalization that lead to terrorism. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/a/7/444340_0.pdf

Paik, L. (2017). Good parents, bad parents: Rethinking family involvement in juvenile justice. Theoretical Criminology, 21(3), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616649430

Pennington, A. L. (2019). Keep kids out of prison: Community-based alternatives for nonviolent juvenile offenders. Intuition: The BYU Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 101-115. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/intuition/ vol14/iss1/9

Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Guckenburg, S. (2013). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. (Crime prevention research review no. 9) U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. http://www.ric-zai-inc.com/Publications/ cops-w0692-pub.pdf

Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland. (2021). Guidelines for the use of diversionary disposals. https://www.ppsni.gov.uk/sites/ppsni/files/ publications/Guidelines%20for%20the %20Use%20of%20Diversionary%20Disposals_0.pdf Public Prosecutor v KM (A Child) & Anor [2010] 9 CLJ 605. Public Prosecutor v Thevesh Sashikumar & Another [2020] 9 CLJ 817. Public Prosecutor v Velory Libong [2005] 4 CLJ 797.

Puzzanchera, C., Hockenberry, S., & Sickmund, M. (2022). Youth and the juvenile justice system: 2022 national report. National Center for Juvenile Justice.

Queensland Government. (2018). Working together changing the story: Youth justice strategy 2019-2023. https://www.cyjma.qld.gov.au/youth-justice/reform/changing-youth-justice-story

Ryon, S. B., Early, K. W., & Kosloski, A. E. (2017). Community-based and family-focused alternative to incarcerated: A quasi experimental evaluation of intervention for delinquent youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.06.002

Schlesinger, T. (2018). Decriminalizing racialized youth through juvenile diversion. The Future of Children, 28(1), 59-81. https://doi.10.1353/FOC.2018.0003

Schuler, M. S., & Darnell, A. J. (2015). Quasi-experimental study of functional family therapy effectiveness for juvenile justice aftercare in a racially and ethnically diverse community sample. Child and Youth Services Review, 50, 75-82. https://doi.10.1016/j.childyouth. 2015.01.013

Sells, S. (2016). Parenting with love and limits (PLL) logic model.

Sentencing Advisory Council. (2012). Sentencing children and young people in Victoria. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2012-04/apo-nid28959.pdf Seorang Kanak-Kanak ‘H’ v Pendakwaraya [2016]5 LNS 30.

Shanahan, R., & diZerega, M. (2016). Identifying, engaging, and empowering families: A charge for juvenile justice agencies. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform. https://www.vera.org/ downloads/publications/family-engagement-for-juvenile-justice-agencies.pdf

Siti Balqis, M. A., Siti Hajar, A. B., Jal Zabdi, M. Y., & Siti Hajar, A. R. (2021). A case study on academic and vocational training for child offenders undergoing a multisystemic therapy-based rehabilitation order in Malaysia. Children and Youth Services Review, 122, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105911

Sriwiyanti., Wahyu, S., & Siti Aminah. (2021). Restorative justice for juvenile offenders in Indonesia: A study of psychological perspective and Islamic law. Journal of Islamic Law, 2(2), 168-196. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v2i2.335

Sterrett-Hong, E. M., Karam. E., & Kiaer, L. (2018). Statewide implementation of parenting with love and limits among youth with co-existing internalizing and externalizing functional impairments reduces return to service rates and treatment cost. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0788-4

Tak, Y. L., & David, P. P. L. (2012). Bonding as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. The Scientific World Journal, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/481471

Taylor, C. (2016). Review of the youth justice system in the England and Wales. Ministry of Justice. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/577105/youth-justice-review-final-report-print.pdf

The Probation Service. (2016). Probation service: Annual report 2015. https://www.msf.gov.sg/ research-and-data/Research-and-DataSeries/Documents/Probation%20Service%20Annual%20 Report%202015.pdf

The Seminar on Promoting Community-Based Treatment in The Asean Region. (2015). Seminar report. http://110.49.71.142/probation_en/efile/seminar_ report_community.pdf.

The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2010). Toolkit on diversion and alternatives to detention. https://christusliberat.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Toolkit-on-Diversion-and-Alternatives-to-Detention-UNICEF.pdf

Thomas, S., Liddell, M., & Johns, D. (2016). Evaluation of the Youth Diversion Pilot Program (YDPP: Stage 3). Justice and Legal Studies, RMIT University of Melbourne. https://www. childrenscourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/YDPP%20Stage%203%20Final%20Report% 20Dec%202016%20%20Executive%20Summary_%28final%29.pdf

Tyrrell, K., Bond, E., Manning, M., & Dogaru, C. (2017). Diversion, prevention and youth justice: A model of integrated decision making an evaluation of the Suffolk Youth Offending Service Diversion Program. https://www.uos.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Diversion%20Evalution%20 Report%202017.pdf

UNICEF East Asia and the Pacific Regional Office. (2017). Diversion not detention: A study on diversion and other alternative measures for children in conflict with the law in East Asia and the Pacific. https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/2401/file/Diversion %20not%20Detention.pdf

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). Introductory handbook on the prevention of recidivism and the social reintegration of offenders: Criminal justice handbook series. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/18-02303_ebook.pdf

United Nations. (1985). United Nations standard minimum rules for the administration of juvenile justice (The Beijing Rules) (No. 16: Social inquiry reports). https://www.ohchr.org/ Documents/ProfessionalInterest/beijingrules.pdf. United Nations Children’s Fund

United Nations. (1990). United Nations guidelines for the prevention of juvenile delinquency (Riyadh Guidelines). http://www.jcp.tt/system/files/resources/United%20Nations%20Guidelines%20 for% 20the%20Prevention%20of%20Juvenile%20Delinquency_Riyadh%20Guidelines.pdf?download=1

Vidal, S., Steeger, C. M., Caron, C., Lasher, L., & Connell, C. M. (2017). Placement and delinquency outcomes among system‐involved youth referred to multisystemic therapy: A propensity score matching analysis. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44, 853–866. https://doi.10.1007/s10488-017-0797-y Volunteer Probation Officer Act 1950 (VPO Act 1950).

Walker, J., Gowen, K., Jivanjee, P., Moser, C., Sellmaier, C., Koroloff, N., & Brennan, E. M. (2013). Pathways to positive futures: State-of-the-science conference proceedings. Portland State University, Research and Training Center for Pathways to Positive Futures.

Wan-Ning, B., Ain, H., & Ling, T. (2017). Impact of Chinese parenting on adolescents’ social bonding, affiliation with delinquent peers, and delinquent behavior. Asian Criminology, 12, 81–105. https://doi.10.1007/s11417-016-9239-0

Warner, C. R. (2014). Juvenile diversion programs: High-risk youth and their effect on offense targeting [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Bemidji State University.

Williams, K., & Berthelsen, D. (2017). The development of prosocial behaviour in early childhood: Contributions of early parenting and selfregulation. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49(1), 73-94.

Wilson, H. A., & Hoge, R. D. (2013). The effect of youth diversion programs on recidivism: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(5), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0093854812451089

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zapolski, T. C. B., Clifton, R. L., Banks, D. E., Hershberger, A., & Aalsma, M. (2018). Family and peer influences on substance attitudes and use among juvenile justice-involved youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(6), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1268-0

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

How to Cite

Siti Balqis Mohd Azam, Siti Hajar Abu Bakar, Jal Zabdi Mohd Yusoff, & Syarifah Maisarah Syed Alwi. (2025). Alternative Approaches in Handling Child Offenders: A Case Study of Community-Based Diversion Programmes in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 16(2), 162-193. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.10

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
1 citations, from Scopus — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.10 OpenAlex W4414000916 Scopus 105014950268