Farmer Rights in Malaysia: Revisiting the Implementation of the Protection of New Plant Varieties Act 2004
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.2.9Keywords:
Food Security, Farmer’s Right, Plant Variety Protection, Traditional Agricultural PracticesAbstract
Agriculture is crucial in guaranteeing food security all over the world. Essentially, farmers play a significant role in food security. Producing improved crop varieties is one of the ways to increase sustainable crop productivity. Farmers in Malaysia, in particular small-scale farmers, are still practicing and relying on some traditional agricultural practices. In order to protect new varieties of crops and plants, there exists some legislation vis-a-vis intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the field of agriculture. Patents and plant breeders’ rights, for instance, bring with them some legal implications towards farmers. This paper aims to examine the existing legislation governing farmer rights in Malaysia, focusing on the relevant provisions of the Protection of New Plant Variety Act 2004 (PNPVA). The research also dwells on current issues pertaining to PNPVA’s implementation and the ongoing proposed amendment. The research has employed doctrinal analysis in its investigation and analysis, which has been based on the available data and materials, supported with input collected from an interview with the Department of Agriculture (DOA). The study has found that the concept of farmer rights should not be jeopardized amidst the Government’s commitment in harmonizing the law with the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV), while optimizing the access of Malaysian farmers to new crop varieties and plant technologies. The present study has also come to the conclusion that the Government must balance the protection afforded to plant breeders with that granted to the local farming community in Malaysia.
References
Bruins, M. (2017). A closer look at the interrelation between farmers’ rights and breeders’ rights. Europeanseed, 4(2). https://www. seedworld.com/europe/2017/04/04/closer-look-interrelation-farmers-rights-breeders-rights/
Chaturvedi, S., & Agrawal, C. (2011). Analysis of farmers’ rights in the light of the protection of plant varieties and farmers’ rights act of India. European Intellectual Property Review, EIPR 708.
Correa, C. M. (2017). Implementing farmers’ rights relating to seeds. South Centre. https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/ uploads/2017/05/RP75_Implementing-Farmers-Rights-Relating-to-Seeds_EN-1.pdf
EAPVP Forum. (2020). Individual implementing strategy of Malaysia. http://eapvp.org/uploads/EAPVPF_13_02_08_IIS_Malaysia.pdf
FAO. (2019). Views, experiences and best practices as an example of possible options for the national implementation of Article 9 of the International Treaty. http://www.fao.org/3/ca8243en/ ca8243en.pdf
FAO. (2017). The global consultation on farmers’ rights 2016: Summary of presentations and discussions, 27–30September 2016, Bali, Indonesia.
GOVPH Official Gazette - Republic Act No. 9168, (2002). https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2002/06/07/ republic-act-no-9168/
Jacob, R. (2019). Europe’s farmers face a generational crisis as young desert the land. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/ f2399c18-e455-11e8-a8a0-99b2e340ffeb
Lawson, C. (2015). Implementing farmers’ rights: Finding meaning and purpose for the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture commitments? https://ssrn. com/abstract=2626668
Lertdhamtewe, P. (2015). Reinventing Thailand’s plant protection regime. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20, 320-329. Malaysian Civil Society (CSO) & farmer groups’ memorandum on RCEP & plant variety protection. (2019). https://www.ip-watch. org/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Malaysia-Memo-of-CSOs-And-Farmers-Groups-No-UPOV-In-RCEP.pdf
Musa, M. K., et al. (2020). Integrating farmers’ right to traditional agricultural knowledge into Malaysia plant variety law. International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 21 S1, 126-136.
Musa, M. K., Mohamed A. M. T., & Mohamed A. M. H. (2019). Integrating farmers’ rights to equitable benefit sharing into the Malaysian plant variety law: Learning from others. Yuridika, 34(2).
Musa, M. K., & Ghadas, Z. A. A. (2016). Protection of Malaysia small farmers under the plant variety law: An appraisal. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 84. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconeg-16.2017.31
Nijar, G. S. (2015). Law Speak - Safeguarding farmers’ seeds. The Sun Daily. https://www.thesundaily.my/archive/1538293-HSARCH326827
Piyaporn Wongruang. The Nation Weekend. (2019). Analysis: Farmers’ rights must be priority in next try at rice bill. https://www.nationthailand.com/perspective/30365450
Sangeeta Shashikant, S., & Meienberg, F. (2015). International Contradictions On Farmers’ Rights: The interrelations between the International Treaty, its Article 9 on Farmers’ Rights, and Relevant Instruments of UPOV and WIPO. Third World Network and the Berne Declaration.
Singh, A. P., & Manchikanti, P. (2011). Sui Generis IPR Laws vis-à-vis farmers’ rights in some Asian countries: Implications under the WTO. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16, 107-116.
Tiller, E., & Cross, F. B. (2005). What is legal doctrine. Public Law and Legal Theory Papers. Northwestern University School of Law. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/76622332.pdf
World Trade Organization (WTO). (2024). Uruguay round agreement: TRIPS Part II — Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of Intellectual Property Rights. https://www.wto.org/ english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04c_e.htm
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
