Consumer Related Theories and the Right to Informed Choice for Consumer in Nano Food Consumption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.9Keywords:
Consumer-related theories, right to informed choice, nano food, theoretical justification, labellingAbstract
The use of nanomaterials in food-by-food producers has increased in today’s modern society. Food that contains nanomaterials is known as nano food, which is associated with both benefits and risks. Due to the uncertainty of its risks, it is important to accord consumers with the right to informed choice in the context of nano food consumption. In the absence of this right in the existing food legislation in Malaysia, this paper aims to examine the underlying principles from the perspective of consumer-related theories to provide theoretical justification in reforming the present food legislation. This paper presents how the identified consume-related theories can be applied to explain the need for such rights in Malaysian legislation. Three consumer-related
theories, which are the Theory of Planned Behaviour, Consumerism heory, and Postmodernism Theory, are analysed through a doctrinal approach and via theory analysis. Deductive inferences were made to establish the rationale for the need to have the right of informed choice available to consumers in the context of nano food consumption. The examination of the theories evidently shows that the right to informed choice can be exercised through labelling requirements for nano food. This paper contributes significantly to the existing body of knowledge as it highlights the need for the right to informed choice for consumers in nano food consumption, and emphasises the identification of consumer-related theories to support legislative reform so as to include the right. This paper suggests the use of labelling as a way of according the right to informed choice to consumers in nano food consumption.
References
Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of “Theory.” Sociological theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x
Abdul Rahim, R., Kasim, E., Azizli, H., Sari, N. A., & Abdullah, S. (2015). Nanotechnology Acceptance: A Case Study of University Students in Malaysia, 4(2), 11–15.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.883474
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, April, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Ajzen, I., & Dasgupta, N. (2015). Explicit and implicit beliefs, attitudes and intentions: The role of conscious and unconscious processes in human behaviour. In The Sense of Agency (pp. 115–144).
Ariff, Z., Latiff, A., & Ayob, M. A. (2014). Food Labels Based On Theory of Planned Behavior In Klang. International Conference on Business and Management ( ICBM ). 2(1), 113–118.
Barrere, V., Everstine, K., Théolier, J., & Godefroy, S. (2020). Trends in food science & technology food fraud vulnerability assessment : Towards a global consensus on procedures to manage and mitigate food fraud. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 100(September 2019), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.002
Beekman, V. (2008). Consumer rights to informed choice on the food market. Journal of Ethic Theory Moral Prac 11:61–72 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-007-9075-5
Bezencon, V, Blili, S. (2010). Ethical products and consumer involvement: what’s new? European Journal of Marketing, 44 No.9/10, 1305-1321, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011062853
Chen, M., Lin, Y., & Cheng, T. (2013). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan. Technovation, 33(2–3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008
Chellaram, C. (2014). Significance of Nanotechnology in Food Industry, APCBEE Procedia 8 109–113.
Edinger, W. H. (2016). Promoting educated consumer choices. Has EU food information legislation finally matured? Journal of Consumer Policy, 39(1), 9-22.
Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1993). Postmodernity: The age of marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(93)90009-N
Ferencz-Kaddari, M., Shifman, A., & Koslowsky, M. (2016). Modeling psychologists’ ethical intention: Application of an expanded theory of planned behavior. Psychological Reports, 118(3), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116647691
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the Blueprint for your “House.” Administrative Issues Journal Education Practice and Research, 4(2), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9
Heise, U. K. (2004). Science, technology, and postmodernism. In The Cambridge Companion to Postmodernism. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521640520.008
Hicks, S. R. C. (2011). Explaining postmodernism. In Scholargy Publishing.
Jepson, R. G., Hewison, J., Thompson, A. G. H., & Weller, D.(2003). How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening. J Med Ethics, 2005, 31, 192–196.
Johnson, R. (2014). Food fraud and “Economically motivated adulteration” of food and food ingredients. Food Fraud and Adulterated Ingredients: Background, Issues, and Federal Action, 1–56.
Jain, A., & Ranjan, S. (2018). Nanomaterials in food and agriculture: An overview on their safety concerns and regulatory issues. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(2), 297-317.
Justo-Hanani, R., & Dayan, T. (2015). European risk governance of nanotechnology: Explaining the emerging regulatory policy. Research Policy, 44(8), 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. respol.2015.05.001
Kampus, K. (2017). Consumer’s right to informed choice regarding organic labelling. Master Dissertation. Wageningen University & Research.
Kan, M. P. H., Fabrigar, L. R., & Fishbein, M. (2017). Theory of Planned Behavior. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8
Karim, M. E., Akhter, S., Munir, A. B., Muhammad-Sukki, F., Hoque, K. E., Mohd Yasin, S. H., Abu-Bakar, S. S., Abu-Bakar, S. H., Bani, N. A., Wirba, A. V., & Abubakar Mas’ud, A. (2017). Malaysian tertiary level students and their understanding, knowledge and perception of nanotechnology. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 6(1), 52–67. http://www.akademiabaru.com/doc/ARSBSV6_N1_P52_67. pdf
Moyer, D. C., Devries, J. W., & Spink, J. (2017). The economics of a food fraud incident e Case studies and examples including Melamine in Wheat Gluten. Food Control, 71, 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.015
McClements, D.J. & Hang Xiao (2017). Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles. Science of Food, 1:6 ; https://doi:10.1038/s41538-017-0005-1
Nandi, V. T. (2016). Consumerism-review of literature. International Journal of Exclusive Management Research, 6(April).
David Peat, F. (2007). From certainty to uncertainty: Thought, theory and action in a postmodern world. Futures, 39(8), 920–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.03.007
Qasim Chaudhry (2008). Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Additives and Contaminants, 25(3), 241-258, https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701744538
Rhodes, C. J. (2014). Eating small: Applications and implications for nanotechnology in agriculture and the food industry. Science Progress, 97(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.3184/00368501 4X13995384317938
Shaughnessy, J. O., & Shaughnessy, N. J. O (2002). Postmodernism and marketing: Separating the wheat from the chaff. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/027467022001010
Sandoval, B. (2009). Perspectives on FDA’s regulation of nanotechnology: Emerging challenges and potential solutions. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 8(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2009.00088.x
Spink, J., Embarek, P. Ben, Savelli, C. J., & Bradshaw, A. (2019). Global perspectives on food fraud: results from a WHO survey of members of the International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN). Npj Science of Food, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-019-0044-x
Sozer, N., & Kokini, J. L. (2009). Nanotechnology and its applications in the food sector. Trends Biotechnol, 27, 82–89.
Sommer, L. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour and the impact of past behaviour. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 10(1), 2011. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber. v10i1.930
Silbergeld E.K., Contreras E.Q., Hartung T., Hirsch C., Honberg H., Jachak A.C., Jordan W., Landsiedel R., & Morris J., (2011). Nanotoxicology: The end of the beginning - Signs on the roadmap to a strategy for assuring the safe application and use of nanomaterials. ALTEX.; 28:236–241.
Sun, W. (2019). Toward a theory of ethical consumer intention formation: re-extending the theory of planned behavior. AMS Review, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-019-00156-6
Singh, T., Shukla, S., Kumar, P., Wahla, V., & Bajpai, V. K. (2017). Application of nanotechnology in food science: Perception and overview. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8(AUG), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01501
Tornikoski, E., & Maalaoui, A. (2019). Critical reflections – The theory of planned behaviour: An interview with Icek Ajzen with implications for entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 37(5), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619829681
William L., Wilkie & David M. G. (1974). The role of marketing research in public policy decision making. Journal of Marketing, 38(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250165
Witzling, L., Shaw, B., & Amato, M. S. (2015). Incorporating information exposure into a theory of planned behavior model to enrich understanding of proenvironmental behavior. Science Communication, 37(5), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015593085
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
