An Overview of High Impact Law Journals in Asian Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.2.11Keywords:
Law journal, legal publication, indexing, citation, high impactAbstract
Academic research journals play a significant role in the field of academia. Its major functions in producing, disseminating and exchanging academic knowledge are important to showcase the research performance of individuals. Publication of academic papers has been considered as a criteria for appointments, hiring, promotions and tenure decisions, worldwide. The current requirement to consider publishing in high quality journals is in its indication of the quality of a person’s research output. It is measured through the quality of the academic research publications, the number of citations of specific papers and the total number of citations. Accordingly, it is important to examine the issues regarding high impact publication of Scopus law journals in Asian countries. This is to enable all new SCOPUS law journals to study and practice good governance in publishing quality articles and for the board of editors to enhance the quality of journal management. The objectives of this paper are: (i) to examine the profiles of law journals in Asian countries indexed by Scopus and Web of Science (WoS); (ii) to examine citations and impact factors of law journals in Asian countries indexed by Scopus and WoS; and (iii) to study the ranking of Scopus law journals in Asian countries. This was an exploratory research and thus qualitative research method was adopted. An oline survey and an interview(s) were conducted by the researcher to gather data. The chief editor and managing editors of the Scopus law journals were the respondents via the online survey and an interview was conducted with the expert in managing high impact publications i.e. the Director of Citation and Infometrics Division, Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Besides, secondary data was gathered from Scopus and WoS. In brief, the challenges in managing high impact journals are securing and maintaining high quality articles published by the journals. There must be periodic review of standard operating procedures by the board of editors in order to maintain an effective and efficient reviewing process, together with engaging staff with excellent proofreading skills. Additionally, the publisher must continuously upgrade the online publication system and maintain a friendly website for authors, subscribers and readers. Ethical practices and a focus on high quality and standard of article publication must be upheld by writers, editors, publishers including the indexing body.
References
Banks, M. G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161–168.
Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2009). Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals: A comparison of new metrics with the journal impact factor. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2009(10), 1471–1476.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.
Brophy, A. L. (2006). The relationship between law review citations and law school rankings. Conn. L. Rev., 39, 43.
Burrell, Q. L. (2007). On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 170–177.
Cahue, M. (2019). Web of Science core collection: Journal evaluation process. Editor’s Day Workshop 27th August 2019, Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Carnelley, M. (2018). In search of the perceived quality and impact of accredited South African law journals: Exploring the possibility of a ranking system. A baseline study: 2009–2014. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 21(1), 1–48.
Chang, C. L., & McAleer, M. (2012). Citations and impact of ISI tourism and hospitality journals. Tourism Management Perspectives, 1, 2–8.
Cheng, C. K., Li, X. R., Petrick, J. F., & O’Leary, J. T. (2011). An examination of tourism journal development. Tourism Management, 32(1), 53–61.
Clarivate Analytics. (2020). Master Journal Lists. https://mjl. clarivate.com/search-results
Duncombe, D., & Servellen, A. V. (2019). Journal quality and Scopus selection process. Editor’s Day Workshop, Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Elsevier. (2020). About Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/en-xs/ solutions/scopus
Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–980.
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93.
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.
International Law Books Services. (2019). Material Submission Act 1986. International Law Books Services.
Jamal, T., Smith, B., & Watson, E. (2008). Ranking, rating and scoring of tourism journals: Interdisciplinary challenges and innovations. Tourism Management, 29(1), 66–78.
Jiang, J., Woosnam, K. M., & Draper, J. (2014). Structural elements of articles and diachronous citation analysis among top-ranking tourism journals (1990–2010). Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 48–56.
Jones, A. W. (2002). JAT’s Impact Factor - Room for Improvement? Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 26(1), 2–5.
Korobkin, R. (1998). Ranking journals: Some thoughts on theory and methodology. Fla. St. UL Rev., 26, 851–874.
Law, R. (2012). The usefulness of impact factors to tourism journals. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1722–1724.
Law, R., & Li, G. (2015). Accuracy of impact factors in tourism journals. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 19–21.
Liu, Y., & Rousseau, R. (2007). Hirsch-type indices and library management: The case of Tongji University Library. In D. Torres-Salinas & H. F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 514–522). Centre for Scientific Information and Documentation (CINDOC) of the Spanish Research Council (CSIC).
Mingers, J., & Yang, L. (2017). Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 323–337.
Neuberger, J., & Counsell, C. (2002). Impact factors: Uses and abuses. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14(3), 209–211.
Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2008). The reference return ratio. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 128–135.
Perry, R. (2006). The relative value of American law review: A critical appraisal of ranking methods. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 11, 1.
Serenko, A. (2010). The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 447–459.
Smyth, R. (2012). Who publishes in Australia’s top law journals. UNSWLJ, 35, 201–244.
Tome, L., & Lipu, S. (2004). Indicators of Journal Quality. R 7 D Discussion Paper #6, University of Wollongong Library, 14p.
Van Gestel, R. (2015). Sense and non-sense of a European ranking of law schools and law journals. Legal Studies, 35(1), 165–185.
Yu, L., Shen, X., Pan, Y., & Wu, Y. (2009). Scholarly journal evaluation based on panel data analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 312–320.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- Semantic Scholar 6 View →
- Scopus 6 View →
- OpenCitations 4 View →
- OpenAlex 3 View →
- Crossref 2 View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
