The Application of Public Benefit Requirement of Charitable Trust in Waqf Court Judgment: A Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.2.7Keywords:
Public benefi, charitable trust, waqf, purpose of charityAbstract
Waqf is a form of voluntary charity and its purposes are recognised by Islamic law as religious, pious or charitable. Charitable trust is a public trust where the settlor may aim to create certain purposes. Both waqf and charitable trust share the same objective, which is for the benefit of the community at large. The objective of this article is to reveal how the requirements of “public benefit” in charitable trust are applicable to waqf cases. In determining the validity of a charitable trust, the requirement of public benefit is essential, particularly under the last three charitable purposes, namely advancement of education, advancement of religion, and other purposes beneficial to the community. Besides, the personal nexus test is applied in the case of charitable trust to ensure no personal linkage between the founder and the beneficiaries. These two elements are necessary to establish a valid charitable trust. The English court will first filter out such a case to ensure that there is no infringement of other people’s rights and exploitation of the charitable trust’s privilege. Public benefit requirement and personal test are also applicable in cases relating to waqf cases. In waqf, the Islamic law prescribes two categories, which are “Waqf Khairi” (Public waqf) and “Waqf Ahli” (Family waqf). However, family waqf is treated as “non-charitable under the influence of English law of trust” because it infringes the rule against perpetuities. The methodology used in this article is doctrinal legal research focusing on the legal principle as well as the cases of public benefit requirement, the personal nexus test, and the rule against perpetuities in charitable trust and waqf. This article found that the requirement of public benefit is applicable in public waqf, but not for family waqf. Despite that, family waqf should be maintained as it is a great channel for wealth distribution and succession planning.
References
Ab Rahman, M. F., & Amanullah, M. (2017). The nature of temporary waqf. Its ruling and public interest. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 7(2), 175-187. https://oarep.usim.edu.my/jspui/ bitstream/123456789/3292/1/The%20Nature%20of%20 Temporary%20Waqf%2c%20its%20Ruling%20and%20 Public%20Interest.pdf
Abu Bakar, B. (2010). Does the civil court have any jurisdiction in Muslim family law matters? Shariah Law Reports, (4).
Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak v Russomoy Dhur Chowdury. (1894). 22 I.A. 76.
AG v National Provincial and Union Bank of England. (1924). AC 262. Al-Tirmidhi. (658). Chapter of Zakah.
Budiman, M. A. (2014). The significance of waqf for economic development. Journal Equilibrium, 2(1), 19–34.
Dal Pont, G. E. (2011). Equity and trusts: Commentary and materials (5th ed.). Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Lawbook Co.
Davies, P. S., & Virgo, G. (2013). Equity & trusts: Text, cases, and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dingle v Turner. (1972). A.C. 601.
Downing v Federal Commissioner of Taxation. (1971). HCA 38.
Fullarton, A. (2006). The common law and taxation of trusts in Australia in the twenty-first century. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi. org%2F10.2139%2Fssrn.2892389
Gilmour v Coat. (1949). AC 426.
Great Britain. (1989). Charities: A framework for the future. The Stationery Office Books.
Hepburn, S. (2013). Principles of equity & trusts (Aus) 2/e. Routledge.
Hiza’i, M. M. (2016). Al-waqf al-muaqqat bahsu fi fiqh muqaran (conference presentation). Makkah al Mukarramah for Waqf Revival Conference, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Ibn Majah (1844). Zakah.
Ibrahim, H. (2013). The revitalization of Islamic trust institution through corporate waqf (conference presentation). 4th International Conference on Business and Economic Research Proceedings, Bandung, Indonesia.
Incorporated Council for Law Reporting v AG. (1972). Ch 73.
IRC v McMullen (1981) A. C. 1.
Jafri, F. A., & Noor, A. M. (2019). Temporary waqf model for Islamic private retirement scheme in Malaysia - A proposal. Journal of Islamic Finance, 8(1), 23–35.
Kahf, M. (1998). Financing the development of Awqaf property (conference presentation). Seminar on Development of Awqaf, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. http://www.iefpedia.com/english/ wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Financing-the-Development-of-Awqaf-Property.pdf
Le Cras v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd. (1969). 1 AC 514.
Mahmud, M. W., & Shah, S. S. (2010). Optimization of philanthropic Waqf: The need for maqasid-based legislative strategies. Shariah Law Reports, 2, 45–29. http://irep.iium.edu.my/id/ eprint/6791
Mills, M. (2016). The development of the public benefit requirement for charitable trusts in the nineteenth century. The Journal of Legal History, 37(3), 269–302.
Mohamad Suhaimi, F. (2018). Wakaf ahli: Peruntukan undang-undang dan pelaksanaannya di Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Shariah and Law. 6(2), 73–81. https://mjsl.usim.edu.my/index. php/jurnalmjsl/article/view/
Mohamad, N. A. (2018). A study on the socio-economic roles of waqf ahli (Family waqf) in promoting family security and a sustainable family economy. IIUM Law Journal, 26(1), 141–160, https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v26i1.383
Mujani, W. K., & Yaakub, N. I. (2017). Waqf for higher education in Malaysia: Overview on challenges. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5), 455-461. https://dx.doi. org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p455-461 Murdoch v Attorney General (tas). (1992). 1 Tas R 117.
Mustafa al-Bugha, Mustafa al-Khin. (1990). Al-Fiqh al-Manhaji, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co. Ltd. (1951). AC 297.
Re Compton. (1951). AC 297.
Re Segelman. (1996). Ch 171.
RePinion. (1965). Ch 85.
Sadique, M. A. (2015). The socio legal significance of family waqf and its revival under state control. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 7(4). 63–69. http://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/KLIBEL7_ Law-43.pdf
Syed Abdul Kader, S. Z., & Md Dahlan, N. H. (2009). Current legal issues concerning awqaf in Malaysia. International Conference on Waqf Laws & Management: Reality and Prospects. 21–22. http://waqfacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Assoc.- Prof.-Dr.-Sharifah-Zubaidah-Syed-Abdul-Kader-SZSAK.- Date.-Currentl-legal-issues-concerning.pdf
Syed Ameer Ali. (1976). The law relating to gifts, wakfs, wills, pre-emption and bailment. n.p.: Law
Thornton v Howe. (1862). 31 Beav 14.
Virgo, G. (2012). The principles of equity & trusts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watt, G. (2016). Cases and materials on equity and trusts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yaacob, H., & Yaacob, H. (2013). Waqf history and legislation in Malaysia: A contemporary perspective. Journal of Islamic and Human Advanced Research, 3(6), 387–402. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/301770595_waqf_history_and_ legislation_in_Malaysia_a_contemporary_perspective
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
