Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments for Forest Offences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.2.3Keywords:
Illegal logging, forest offences, fine, imprisonment, compoundAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to determine if the law currently in force is ineffective and thus contributes to the occurrence of forest offences. The paper analyses the punishments under the National Forestry Act 1984 based on the perceptions of related stakeholders on the effectiveness of those punishments in addressing illegal logging and other forest offences. A questionnaire was utilized to obtain responses from 240 purposively selected stakeholders. The collected data were analysed in the context of measures of central tendency to identify the extent to which the respondents agreed with the stated items. The results demonstrate that the law was
generally perceived to be acceptable. The findings also identified compensation payment based on the value of tree or wood as themost significant item, while longer imprisonment term was rated as the least significant item.
References
Abu Hassan, M. R. (2019). Perketatkan penguatkasaan agar pindaan Akta Perhutanan lebih berkesan. Sinar Harian. https://www. google.com/amp/s/amp.sinarharian.com.my/article/62513/ BERITA/Nasional/Perketatkan-penguatkuasaan-agar-pindaan-Akta-Perhutanan-lebih-berkesan
Blakeney, J. (2001). Overview of forest law enforcement in East Malaysia. World Wildlife Funds (WWF)-Malaysia.
Boyd, C. C. (2008). Expanding the Arsenal for sentencing environmental crimes: Would therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice work? William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, Article 6, 32(2).
Billiet, C., & S. Rousseau. (2014). How real is the threat of imprisonment for environmental crime? European Journal of Law and Economics, 37(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10657-011-9267-2
Brack, D., & Bailey, R. (2013). Ending global deforestation: Policy options for consumer countries. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Cohen, M. A. (1992). Environmental crime and punishment: Legal/ Economic theory and empirical evidence on enforcement of Federal Environmental Statutes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(4).
Contreras-Hermosilla, A. (2002). Law Compliance in the Forestry Sector an Overview. World Bank Institute. WBI Working Paper.
Enetjärn, A., Cole, S., Kniivilä,M., Hårklau, S. E., Hasselström, L., Sigurdson, T., & Lindberg, J. (2015). Environmental compensation. Key conditions for increased and cost effective application. Nordic Council of Ministers.
Faure, M. G., & Visser, M. (2003). Law and economics of environmental crime: A survey. Australian Institute of Criminology.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2005). Best practices for improving law compliance in the forest sector. FAO Forestry Paper 145.
Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia (FDPM). (2019). “Pemahaman Pindaan Akta 1984”.https://www.forestry.gov. my/index.php/my/pemahaman-pindaan-akta-1984
Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia (FDPM). (2017). Forestry Statistics Forest Enforcement Division.
Goncalves, M. P., Panjer, M., Greenberg, T. S., & Magrath, W. B. (2012). Justice for Forests. Improving Criminal Justice Efforts to Combat Illegal Logging. The World Bank. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/International Development Association.
Hansard Report. (2015). The Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources.http://www.kats.gov.my/parlimen/Lists/papar-Jawapan-Parlimen.aspx?ID=%20%20%20%20748
Hoare, A. (2015). Illegal Logging and Related Trade. The Response in Malaysia. Energy, Environment and Resources. A Chatham House Assessment. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Kaur, S. (2011). Potential challenges in a witness protection programme in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 19(2), 363–368.
Ling, S. (2015). Jail illegal loggers, says judge. The Star. https://www. thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/08/14/jail-illegal-loggers-says-judge/
Lawson, S., & MacFaul, L. (2010). Illegal Logging and Related Trade Indicators of the Global Response Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Marsh, K., Chaflin, A., & Roman, J. K. (2008). What does cost-benefit analysis add to decision making? Evidence from the criminal justice literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-008-9049-1
McDowell, P. (2012). Longer prison sentences are not the way to cut crime. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/ commentisfree/2012/jul/16/longer-prison-sentences-civitas.
Mohd Gani, I. Q. L. (2013). Current situation of illegal logging in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Sciences, Research Article, 2(06), pages 12-17.
Mohd Nor, M. N., & Mahli, A. R. (2017). Executive Talk 2017: Combating Wildlife and Forestry Crime. Department of Wildlife and National Parks Peninsular Malaysia.
Mohd, R. (1999). Factors Influencing the occurrence of forest offenses in a Peninsular Malaysia State. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 7(2), 91-95.
Mohd, R., & Yaman, A. R. (2001). Overview of Forest Law Enforcement in Peninsular Malaysia. World Wildlife Funds (WWF)-Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. National Forestry Act 1984 (Act 313).
Reboredo, F. (2013). Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging. Environ Syst Decis. 33, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9444-7
Robinson, E. J. Z., Kumar, A., & Albers, H. J. (2010). Protecting developing countriesʼ forests: Enforcement in theory and practice. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2, 25-38.
Rosander, M. N. (2008). Illegal Logging: Current Issues and Opportunities for Sida/ SENSA Engagement in Southeast Asia. Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific (RECOFTC).
Sharma, J. K. (2007). Business statistics. Second edition. Pearson Education.
Tacconi, L., Boscolo, M., & Brack, D (2003). National and International Policies to Control Illegal Forest Activities. A Report for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Japan. Center for International Forestry Research.
Vivoda, V., & Fulcher, J. (2017). Compensation for Environmental Damage. Series on International Best Practice, Working Paper No. 3, Mining Legislation Reform Initiative), AUA Center for Responsible Mining, American University of Armenia (Yerevan, Armenia).
Wells, A. C., Thang, H. C., & Chen, H. K. (2008). Systems for verification of legality in the forest sector, Malaysia: Domestic timber production and timber imports. Country Case Study 8. Verifor. Options for Forest Verification.
Wolf, R. (2016). Environmental crimes and imprisonment: Does prison work to prevent and punish environmental criminals? Pace Law School. Pace University. http://digitalcommons. pace.edu/lawdissertations/19/
World Bank (2006). Strengthening Forest Law Enforcement and Governance Addressing a Systemic Constraint to Sustainable Development. Environment and Agriculture and Rural Development Departments.
Woodage, W. Y. (2014). Burdens of proof, presumptions and standards of proof in criminal cases. Mizan Law Review, 8(1), 252-270. https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v8i1.8
Yaakob, A. (2014). A legal analysis on law and policy on conservation of forest in Peninsular Malaysia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
