Executing War Captives Based on Maslahat: Reflecting on and Concluding the Contemporary Debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.1.9Keywords:
Islam, Jihad, Captive, execution, International LawAbstract
The debate on whether war captives may be executed has been a debate among Islamic scholars since the classical era until today. Some say war captives may be executed based on maslahat, others say it is categorically impermissible. However, in recent decades, the debate on this matter has entered a new phase, with the opposing sides, i.e., permissible if maslahat is present versus the categorically impermissible, but with new arguments emerging aside from the reiteration of some classical arguments. Some of these new arguments are non-contextual, such as new conclusions derived from the known prophetic tradition (sunnah) and contextual arguments such asthe role of international law vis-a-vis Islamic law.Using the literature review as the research method this article has examined the contemporary debate and will consider both classical arguments, as well as current contextual arguments, in the light of the usu/ al-fiqh, and how international law (particularly international humanitarian law) should affect Islamic legal rulings. It is concluded that categorically prohibiting the execution of war captives is the weaker position as it relies on an incorrect interpretation of the dalil and its unrealistic application in warfare. It is also found that the position permitting captive execution if there is maslahat is, despite being often misunderstood, the stronger position, both interms of the dalil and its realistic application in warfare.
References
‘Azzām, ‘Abdullah. (n.d.). Fī Ẓilāl Sūrah al-Tawbah. Markaz al-Shahīd ‘Azzām Al-I‘lamī. ’Awdah, ’Abd al-Qadir. (2003). Al-Tashri‘ Al-Jinā’i Al-Islāmī Muqāranan Bi Al-Qānūn Al-Waḍ‘i. Maktabah Dar al-Turath.
Abdul Malik, M. N. (2016). Unpalatable decisions by International Court of Justice (ICJ) and palatable solutions by Islamic International Law (siyar). UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UUM JLS), 7, 35–70.
Afsah, E. (2008). Contested universalities of international law. Islam’s struggle with modernity. Journal of the History of International Law, 10, 259–307.
Ahmad, B. (1979). Muhammad and the Jews: A re-examination. Vikas Publishing House.
Al-’Uthaymin, M. S. (n.d.). The foundations of the knowledge of Usul. 5 Pillars Publishing.
Al-Bukhārī, M. ibn I. (1997). Sahih Al-Bukhari (Vol. 9). Darussalam.
Al-Būṭī, M. S. R. (1973). Ḍawābiṭ Al-Maṣlaḥat fī al-Sharī‘ah Al-Islāmiyyah. Mu’assasah al-Risalah.
Al-Dawoody, A. (2011). The Islamic law of war: Justifications and regulations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Al-Dawoody, A. (2019). IHL and Islamic Law in contemporary armed conflict: Expert Workshop, Geneva 29-30 October 2018. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/eyperts-workshop-reportihl-and-islamic-law-contemporary-armed-conflicts Al-Dhahabī, M. ibn A. ibn ʿUthmān I. (1405 H). Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā’ (Vol. 17). Mu’assasah al-Risalah. Al-Dhahabī, M. ibn A. ibn ʿUthmān I. (1422 H). Siyar A‘lām alNubalā’ (Vol. 4). Mu’assasah al-Risalah. Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥāmid M. (1324 H). Al-Muṣtaṣfa Min ‘Ilm al-Uṣūl (Vol. 1). Al-Amiriya Press. Al-Lāḥim, ‘Abd al-Karīm ibn Muḥammad. (2011). Al-Muṭli‘u ‘alā Daqā‘iq Zād Al-Mustaqni‘ (Vol. 2). Dar Kanuz Ishbiliya.
Al-Maqdisi, A. M. (2005). Saudi di mata seorang Al Qaidah. Jazera. Al-Mubārakfūrī, Ṣafi al-Raḥmān. (1427 H). Al-Rahik Makhtum (Vol. 1). Dar al-’Ushama.
Al-Nawawī, Y. ibn S. (2009). Al-Majmu’ Syarah Al-Muhaadzdzab (Vol. 6). Pustaka Azzam.
Al-Naysābūrī, M. ibn al-Ḥajjāj. (2007). Sahih Muslim (Vol. 2). Darussalam.
Al-Qardhawi, Y. (2010). Fiqih Jihad. Mizan.
Al-Sarakhsī, M. ibn A. ibn A. S. (1971). Sharḥ al-Siyār al-Kabīr. Al-Shirkah al-Sharqiyyah li l-I‘lānāt. Al-Shathri, S. N. (1426 H). Sharḥ Al-Manẓumatu Al-Sa‘diyah Fî al-Qawā‘id al-Fiqhiyyah (2nd ed.). Dar Kanuz Ishbiliya.
Al-Shāṭibī, I. (n.d.). Al-I‘tiṣām (S. Al-Hilālī (tahqiq) (ed.); Vol. 2). Dar Ibn Al-Qayyim.
Al-Utsaimin, M. S. (2008). Ushul Fiqih. Media Hidayah. Al-Wā’ilī, M. ibn Ḥumūd. (1440 H). Bughayat al-Muqtaṣid Sharḥ Bidāyat al-Mujtahid (Vol. 8). Dar Ibn Hazm.
Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (2011). Fiqih Islam Wa al-Adillatuhu (Vol. 8). Gema Insani Press. Alī Ḥasan, ‘Uthmān bin ‘. (1415 H). Manhaj Al-Istidlal ‘Alā Al-I‘tiqād ‘Inda Ahl al-Sunnah Wa al-Jamā‘ah. Maktabah Ar-Rushd.
Allen, L. (2020). A history of false hope: Investigative commissions in Palestine. Stanford University Press.
Anas, M. (1992). Muwatta Al-Malik. Madinah Press.
Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, sovereignty, and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press.
Arafat, W. N. (1976). New light on the story of Banū Qurayza and the Jews of Medina. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 108(2), 100–107. As-Sallabi, ‘Ali Muhammad. (2007). ‘Umar ibn Al-Khaṭṭāb: His Life and Times (Vol. 2). International Islamic Publishing House. As-Sallabi, ‘Ali Muhammad. (2013). Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq: His life and times (F. Shafeeq (trans.)). International Islamic Publishing House.
Ashur, I. I. (2006). Treatise on Maqasid al-Shariah (M. E.-T. ElMesawi (trans.)). IIIT.
Ath-Thabari, M. J. (2007). Tafsir Ath-Thabari (Vol. 23). Pustaka Azzam.
Azzam, A. (1993). Jihad: Adab dan hukumnya. Gema Insani Press.
Badawi, N. (2016). Regulation of armed conflict: Critical comparativism. Third World Quarterly, 37(11), 1990–2009.
Benson, M., & Kathman, J. D. (2014). United Nations bias and force commitments in civil conflicts. The Journal of Politics, 76(2), 350–363.
Deplano, R. (2015). The strategic use of international law by the United Nations Security Council: An empirical study. Springer International Publishing.
El-Fadl, K. A. (1999). The rules of killing at war, an inquiry into classical sources. The Muslim World, 89(2), 144–157.
Golvach, S. H. (2016). ‘She is not one who would have fought’: Countering legitimacy challenges to international humanitarian law through comparative analysis of Islamic laws of armed conflict. The University of Texas at Austin.
Hamidullah, M. (2011). Muslim conduct of state. Sh. Muhammad Ashraf.
Harris, K. M. A. (2012). Pandangan Islam terhadap tradisi dan kemodenan. Jurnal Hadhari, 4(1), 23–48.
Henckaerts, J.-M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
ibn Kathir, I. (2003). Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Vol. 9). Darussalam.
Ibn Rushd. (2000). The distinguished jurist’s primer (I. A. N. Khan (trans.); Vol. 1). Garnet Publishing.
Ibn Taymiyyah, A. ibn `Abd al-Ḥalīm. (1426). Majmu‘ Al-Fatāwa (Vol. 31). Dar al-Wafa.
Khallaf, A. W. (2005). Ilmu Ushul Fiqih. PT Rineka Cipta.
Kotlik, M. D. (2012). Towards equality of Belligerents: Why are armed groups bound by IHL? Experts Conference on International Humanitarian Law: Emerging Issues in the Law of Armed Conflict.
Kuperman, A. J. (2008). The moral hazard of humanitarian intervention: Lessons from the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 49–80.
Mason, V. (2021). The ‘Question of Palestine’: From liminality to emancipation. Review of International Studies, 47(1), 107–127.
Mohamad, Y. (2016). Contemporary Ijtihad: An Analysis of Individual And Collective Approaches. Islamic and Strategic Studies Institute.
Muhammadin, F. M. (2021). Mukadimah Fikih Siyar: Pokok-pokok Hukum Internasional Islam Kontemporer. Bentala Tamadun Nusantara.
Muhammadin, F. M., & Mohd Kamal, M. H. (2019). The Western Universalism v. Cultural Relativism Debate on Human Rights and Islam: An ‘Aqīdah-Based Approach. Afkar: Journal of ’Aqidah & Islamic Thought, 21(2), 175–216.
Muhammadin, F. M., & Nashrullah, M. J. (2021). The Authenticity of Saʿd Ibn Muʿādh’s Judgement: A Response to Contemporary Challenge. Al-Burhān: Journal of Qurʾan and Sunnah Studies, 4(1).
Munir, M. (2010). Debates on the Rights of Prisoners of War in Islamic Law. Islamic Studies, 49(4), 463–492.
Munir, M. (2011). Some reflections on the story of Banu Qurayzah: A re-evaluation of Ibn Ishaq’s account. Islamabad Law Review, 1(2), 7–28.
Nyazee, I. A. K. (2003). Islamic Jurisprudence. The Other Press.
Rizkiah, S. K., & Muhammadin, F. M. (2020). A critical examination towards the Islamic discourse on “Limited liability.” UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 1–36.
Salaymeh, L. (2016). The beginnings of Islamic law: Late antique Islamic legal traditions. Cambridge University Press.
Setia, A. (2016). Freeing Maqāṣid and Maṣlaḥah from surreptitious utilitarianism. Islamic Sciences, 14(2), 127–157.
Syafi’i, I. (2004). Ringkasan Kitab Al-Umm (Vol. 2). Pustaka Azzam.
Wilcox, F. O. (1945). II. The Yalta voting formula. The American Political Science Review, 39(5), 943–956. Zaydan, ‘Abd al-Karim. (2015). Synopsis on the elucidation of legal Maxims in Islamic law (M. H. Rahman & A. Ismail (trans.)). IBFIM.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
