Keperluan Prosedur Operasi Standard dalam Penerimaan Dokumen Digital di Mahkamah Sivil Malaysia
(Requirementsfor Standard Operating Procedure in the Admissibility of Digital Documents in the Malaysian Civil Courts)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.1.14Keywords:
Dokumen digital, kebolehterimaan, kaedah pembuktian, prosedur operasi standard (SOP), mahkamah sivil, Digital document, admissibility, method of proof, standard operating procedure (SOP), civil courtAbstract
Keperluan dalam memastikan kebolehgunaan dan kebolehpercayaan dokwnen digital di mahkamah merupakan salah satu penentu kebolehterimaan dokumen digital sebagai kaedah pembuktian di mahkamah. Oleh itu, bagi mengekalkan keasliannya, dokumen digital perlu dinilai secara betul dengan mengglmakan prosedur khusus supaya bukti tersebut terlindung daripada diceroboh dan diubah lantas memastikan ia diterima sebagai bukti, khususnya di mahkamah sivil. Waiau bagaimanapun, masih tiada kajian yang membincangkan aspek keperluan prosedur operasi standard (SOP) dalam kebolehterimaan dokumen digital di mahkamah sivil walaupun secara umumnya mahkamah sivil telah pun mengguna pakai dokumen digital sebagai bukti seja.k tahun 1950-an. Oleh itu, kajian inia.kan membincangkan kedudukan dokumen digital di mahkamah sivil, enakmen, dan peruntukan berkaitan penggunaannya serta SOP untuk. mengguna.kan dokumen digital sebagai bukti khususnya di mahkamah sivil. K.ajian ini juga mengguna.kan kaedah kualitatif dengan mengumpul data daripada sumber primer dan sumber sekunder yang kemudiannya dianalisis mengguna.kan kaedah analisis kandungan. K.ajian mendapati bahawa satu SOP tentang penerimaan dokumen digital di mahkamah sivil adalah sangat penting dan sesuai dengan undang undang untuk. memastikan bahawa bukti yang dikemukakan adalah sahih dan boleh dipercayai, seperti yang digariskan oleh mahkamah. Hasil kajian ini juga menunjukkan bahawa ia boleh dijadikan sebagai rujukan oleh para hakim dan pengamal undang-undang sivil untuk. membuat pertimbangan adil terhadap isu berkaitan dengan dokumen digital sebagai salah satu bentuk. kaedah pembuktian khususnya di mahkamah sivil.
ABSTRACT
The need to ensure the usability and reliability of digital documents in court isoneofthedeterminants intheadmissibility ofdigital documents as a method of proof in court. Therefore, in order to maintain its authenticity, digital documents must be evaluated in the right way to protect evidence from being tampered with and altered through specific procedures to ensure that they can be accepted as evidence, especially in civil courts. However, there are no specific studies asyet that discuss the requirements of standard operatingprocedure (SOP) in the admissibility of digital documents in civil courts; even though generally, the civil courts have been adopting digital documents as a method ofproof since the 1950s. Thispaper examines theposition of digital documents in civil courts, the enactments and provisions relating to their use including SOPsfor the use of digital documents as evidence, particularly in civil courts. Qualitative methods were used to collect datafrom primary and secondary sources, which were then analyzed using content analysis. The results of the studyfound that SOP is important in the admissibility of digital documents by the civil courts, to verify thatproof submitted to the court is genuine and accurate in accordance with the guidelines of the court. The results also show that this study can be used as referencefor judges and civil lawpractitioners to makefair judgements on issues related to digital documents as aform ofproof method especially in civil courts.
References
undang-undang hukum acara pidana dan hukum pidana Islam. KAN Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 1-75.
Adjomi, M. M. R. H., (2020). Penggunaan sebagai bukti elektronik t Ahmad, Baharuddin, A. S.,rakaman Hashim,video H., Shah, H. alat A. R., deo sebagai alat bukti elektronik tindak pidana Ruskam, A., & Harun, M. A. kitab
W. (2020). Rejuvenating human perzinaan menurut rancangan undang-undang hukum acara pidana dan h capital in Syariah legal institutions through fiqh Jakarta, forensics g-undang hukum acara pidana dan hukum pidana Islam. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah 1-75. fundamental module: A preliminary review. Malaysian Journal ayatullah Ahmad, Jakarta,M. 1-75. H., Baharuddin, A. S., Hashim, H., Shah, H. A. R., Ruskam, A., & Harun, M. of and 8(1), 9-24., H. A. R., Ruskam,Rejuvenating A.,Syariah & Harun, M.Law, A. W. (2020). human capital in Syariah legal institutions through fiqh forensics Ahmad, M. H., Baharuddin, A. S., Mahat, N. A.,Journal Hashim,ofH., Shah, H. al institutions through fiqhAforensics fundamental module: preliminary review. Malaysian Syariah and Law, 8(1), 9-2 A. R., Ismail, W. A. F. W., & Mutalib, L. A. (2020). Penggunaan ournal of Syariah Law, 8(1), 9-24. A. S., Mahat, N. A., Hashim, H., Shah, H. A. R., Ismail, W Ahmad, and M. H., Baharuddin, Serangga Sebagai Perundangan Jenayah Dalam Perunda ashim, H., Shah, H. A. R., Ismail, W. A.Keterangan F. W., & Dalam Mutalib, L. A. (2020). Penggunaan Serangga Sebagai Keterangan Islam. Serangga, 25(1),Jenayah 68-83. a Sebagai Keterangan Dalam Perundangan Islam. Serangga, 25(1), 68-83. Al Shibili, A., Saleh, A., & Zakaria,
M. (2019). (2019). عوارضها بين الشريعة اإلسالمية والقوانين المعاصرة Al Shibili, A., Saleh, A., & Zakaria, M. testimony and its اإلسالمية والقوانين المعاWITNESS وعوارضها بين الشريعة شهادة الشهود: TESTIMONY ANDWitness ITS IMPEDIMENTS BETWEEN ISLAMIC impediments between Islamic Law and Contemporary Laws. EDIMENTS BETWEEN ISLAMIC LAW AND CONTEMPORARY LAWS. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 7(1), 71-83 Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 7(1), 71-83. urnal of Syariah Law, 7(1),A., 71-83. Azhan,and M., ‘Azam, & Hassan,
A. (2017). Keterangan dokumen dalam bentuk digital Azhan, M., ‘Azam, A., & Hassan, A. (2017). Keterangan dokumen di sisi prinsi ngan dokumen dalam bentuk digital di Mahkamah Syariah: Analisis berkaitan definisi serta kebolehterimaannya dalam bentuk digital di Mahkamah Syariah: Analisis berkaitan kebolehterimaannya di sisiUKM prinsip syariah di Repository, 1-12. Malaysia. Journal Article definisi serta kebolehterimaannya di sisi prinsip syariah di, 1-12.
Azhan, M., & ‘Azam, A. (2021). Kebolehterimaan keterangan dokumen elektronik d Malaysia. UKMdi Journal Article Repository, 1-12. n keterangan dokumen elektronik Mahkamah Syariah: dan penyelesaiannya [Online Conference]. Azhan, M., &Analisis ‘Azam,permasalahan
A. (2021). Kebolehterimaan keterangan yelesaiannya [Online Conference]. International Conference on Syariah & Law 2021 (ICONSYAL 2021), 704-713. dokumen elektronik di Mahkamah Syariah: Analisis
NSYAL 2021), 704-713. Azimuddin
A. (2019, November 29). Malaysia[Online - Reliance on copies in the absenc permasalahan dan penyelesaiannya Conference]. Reliance on copies in the absence of original documents. https://www.conventuslaw.com/report/malaysia-reliance-on-c International Conference on Syariah & Law 2021 (ICONSYAL w.com/report/malaysia-reliance-on-copies-in-the2021), 704-713. absence-of/ Azimuddin
A.(2017). (2019,The November 29). Malaysia - Reliance on Baharuddin, A. S. Integration of Forensic Science Fundamentals and Al-Qar copies in the absence of original documents. https://www. ic Science Fundamentals and Maqasid Al-Qarinah Towards (Doctor of Philosophy). Universiti Teknolo Achieving Al-Shari'ah. conventuslaw.com/report/malaysia-reliance-on-copies-in-theof Philosophy). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. absence-of/ Baharuddin, A. S., Ahmad, M. H., Ismail, W. A. F. W., Mutalib, L. A., & Harun, M. A A. global
S.M.(2017). The Integration of Forensic Science. W., Mutalib,Baharuddin, L. A., & Harun, A. W. through (2019). Catalysing peace the strengthening of forensic science applicatio Fundamentals and Al-Qarinah Towards Achieving Maqasid hening of forensic Law. science applicationJournal in Sharīof ‘ahthe International Institute of Islamic Thought an Al-Shajarah: Al-Shari’ah. (Doctor of Philosophy). Universiti Teknologi onal Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 77-103. Borisevich, G., Chernyadyeva,
N., Frolovich, E., & Pastukhov, P. (2012). Comparati Malaysia, Skudai. & Pastukhov, P. (2012). Comparative review of cybercrime law and digital forensics in Russia, The United States and under th ssia, The United States and underofthe on cybercrime theconvention council of Europe. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 39(2) rthern Kentucky Law Buckland M.Review, (1998).39(2), What 267-326. is a "digital document"?. Journal of the American Society fo. Journal of the American for Information Science, Society 48(9), 804-809.
Baharuddin, A. S., Ahmad, M. H., Ismail, W. A. F. W., Mutalib, L. A., & Harun, M. A. W. (2019). Catalysing global peace through the strengthening of forensic science application in Sharī ‘ah Law. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 77-103. Borisevich, G., Chernyadyeva, N., Frolovich, E., & Pastukhov,
P. (2012). Comparative review of cybercrime law and digital forensics in Russia, The United States and under the convention on cybercrime of the council of Europe. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 39(2), 267-326.
Buckland M. (1998). What is a “digital document”?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 804-809.
Cameron, S. (2011). Digital evidence. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 80(8), 14-19. Factor M., Henis E., Naor D., Rabinovici-Cohen S., Reshef P., & Ronen S. (2009). Authenticity and provenance in long term digital preservation: Modeling and implementation in preservation aware storage. In Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance. 1-10.
Goode, S. (2009). The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence. Review of Litigation, 29(1), 1-64.
Granja F. M., & Rafael G. D. R. (2017). The preservation of digital evidence and its admissibility in the court. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2017.081749
Grimm, P. W. (2014). Authenticating Digital Evidence. GP Solo, 31(5), 1-55.
Horvath, Frank, Meesig, Robert. (1998). A content analysis of textbooks on criminal investigation: An evaluative comparison to empirical research findings on the investigative process and the role of forensic evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 133-140.
Insa F. (2007). The admissibility of electronic evidence in court (A.E.E.C.): Fighting against high-tech crime—results of a European study. Journal of Digital Forensic Practice, 1(4), 285-289, https://doi.org/10.1080/15567280701418049
Isma N. L., & Koyimatun A. (2014). Kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti informasi elektronik pada dokumen elektronik serta hasil cetaknya dalam pembuktian tindak pidana. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Gadjah Mada, 110-113.
Ismail, N., Ramlee, Z., & Abas, A. (2022). The legal proof of Macau scam in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 10(1), 23-33. Ismail, W. A. F. W., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & al-Qubaty,
M. A. A. R. (2019). Document Falsification/Forgery from the View of Islamic Jurisprudence and Malaysian Law. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 57(2), 459-498. Ismail, W. A. F. W., Baharuddin, A. S., Mutalib, L. A., & Alias, M.
A. A. (2021). An appraisal of digital documents as evidence in Islamic Law. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 198-198. Ismail, W. A. F. W., Rashid, M. R. A., Shukor, S. A., Mutalib, L. A., Baharuddin, A. S., Saleh, M. A. M. a.,...
Alias, M. A. A. (2020). Hibah melalui khidmat sistem pesanan ringkas (SMS) bagi pesakit Covid-19 dalam keadaan maraḍ al-mawt menurut perspektif syarak dan perundangan islam: Hibah Using Short Message Service (SMS) for COVID-19 Patients in Maraḍ AlMawt Condition According to Shara’and Islamic Perspective. AL-MAQĀṢID The International Journal of Maqāṣid Studies and Advanced Islamic Research, 1(2), 42-54.
Kuntze, N., & Rudolph, C. (2011, May 26). Secure digital chains of evidence. Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering, 1-8, Oakland, California, USA.
Mohamad Ismail, M. Y. (2013). Nilai keterangan elektronik dan digital menurut Akta Keterangan 1950. Pengaman, Official Magazine of Royal Malaysia Police, 39-50.
Mohamad, A. M. (2019). Admissibility and authenticity of electronic evidence in the co urts of Malaysia and United Kingdom. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 4(15), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.35631/ ijlgc.4150013
Mohamed, D. (2011). Computer evidence: Issues and challenges in the present and in the future. Sixth of University Utara Malaysia, International Legal Conference, 1-29.
Mohamed, D., & Ramlee, Z. (2014). Cases of electronic evidence in Malaysian courts: The civil and syariah perspective. eJournal of Social Science Research, 1-10.
Molino, F., & Rodriguez, G. D. (2017). The preservation of digital evidence and its admissibility in court. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2017.10002624
Nor, A. H. M. (2018). Kaedah-kaedah pembuktian kes hibah di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia: Rujukan kes-kes dalam jurnal hukum. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(3), 31-40.
Patrick, Linda Jean (2013). Justification of a qualitative methodology to investigate the emerging concept: The dimensions of religion as underpinning constructs for mass media social marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 1(2), 214-243. https://doi.org/10.22158/jbtp.v1n2p214
Radhakrishna G. (2014). Digital evidence in Malaysia. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 9, 31-41. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v9i0.1987
Radhakrishna G., Zan M., & Khong D. W. K. (2013). Computer evidence in Malaysia: Where are we?. SSRN Electronic Journal, (3):xxxiii, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2208973
Radhakrishna, G. (2016). Section 90A Evidence Act 1950 of Malaysia: A time for review. Annual International Conference on Law, Regulations and Public Policy, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-3809_LRPP16.35
Rajamanickam, R. (2017). Scope of section 45 of evidence Act 1950: The need for revision. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, Penerbit UKM, 1-14.
Sa’di M. M., Kamarudin A. R. (2020, Feb 22). The authenticity of electronic document in Islamic law and Malaysian law of evidence. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Penyelidikan Pengurusan Hal Ehwal Islam Di Malaysia, 295-315.
Sa’di, M. M., Kamarudin A. R., Mohamed D., & Ramlee Z., (2015). Authentication of electronic evidence in cybercrime cases based on Malaysian laws. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanitie, 153-168.
Saifuddin S., Markom R., & Muhamad M. M. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan Mahkamah Syariah dan Mahkamah Sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1‒ 34.
Shailendra S. (2021, Januari 24). Exploring the concept of primary and secondary evidence. http://www.legalserviceindia.com/ legal/article-5124-exploring-the-concept-of-primary-andsecondary-evidence.html
Shaw G. (2000). Digital document integrity. Multimedia ‘00 2000, Computer Science. 143-144. Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ruzian Markom & Mohd. Munzil Muhamad. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian dalam undang-undang keterangan Mahkamah Syariah dan Mahkamah Sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1‒ 34. secondary-evidence.html
Shaw G. (2000). Digital document integrity. Multimedia '00 2000, Computer Scienc ultimedia '00 Suhaizad 2000, Computer Science. 143-144. Saifuddin, Ruzian
Markom & Mohd. Munzil Muhamad. (2019). Kaedah pe UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 14,dalam No. 1 (January) 2023, pp: 365–
Munzil Muhamad. (2019). Kaedah pembuktian undang-undang keterangan Mahkamah Syariah dan Mahkamah Sivil di M Syariah dan Mahkamah Sivil di Malaysia: Suatu kajian perbandingan. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-undang Malaysia, 31(1), 1‒ 34 dang-undangTengku Malaysia, 31(1),T., 1‒& 34. Tengku Hussain, T., & Wan Ismail, Ismail, W.
W. (2019). (2019). دراسة تحليلية:التوقيع اإللكتروني في قانون اإلثبات Hussain, Wan دراسة تحل:في قانون اإلثباتofاإللكتروني التوقيع مكانة : The Status The status of electronic signatureStudy. in Malaysian Jo Electronic Signature in The Evidence Law: Analytical Law: Analytical Study. Malaysian Journal of Syariah The Evidence Law: Analytical study. Malaysian Journal of and Law, 7(1), 161-170. Syariah 161-170. Wan Ismail, W.and A. Law, F., &7(1), Ramlee
Z. (2013). Keterangan melalui kitabah: Menurut f erangan melalui Menurut fiqh dan undangWankitabah: Ismail, W. A. F., & Ramlee (2013). Keterangan melalui undang semasa di Malaysia. Z. JUUM, 1-11. 1. kitabah: Menurut fiqh dan undang-undang di Malaysia. Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Mutalib L. A., Abdullah, semasa Z., & Murad,
A. A. M. (2015). Doc JUUM, 1-11. Z., & Murad, A. A. the
M. (2015). Document forensic, Fiqh and the Syariah Courts. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11 Wan Ismail, W.Space, A. F., 11(4), Mutalib L. – A., Abdullah, Z., & Murad, A. A. M. ian Journal of Society and Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Shukor S. 139. A., Hashim H., A., & Baharuddin A (2015). Document forensic, the theMutalib SyariahL. Courts. H., Mutalib L. A., & reality Baharuddin
A. S. (2019). TheFiqh and on application and challenges of closed-circuit television (CCTV) ima Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(4), 132–139. closed-circuit television (CCTV) images as evidence in shariah cases in Malaysia. Humanities Social Wan Ismail, W. A.criminal F., Shukor S. A., Hashim H., Mutalib L.&A., & Sciences Rev Humanities & Social361. Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 356https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7661 Baharuddin
A. S. (2019). The reality on application and 7661 challenges of closed-circuit (CCTV) images as Wan Ismail, W., Abdul Shukor, S., television Hashim, Hasnizam, & Baharuddin, A. S. (201 asnizam, & Baharuddin, A. in S. (2018). criminal Pembuktian evidence shariah cases in Malaysia. melalui televisyen/kamera litar tertutup (CCTV)Humanities dalam kes-kes jenayah: (CCTV) dalam kes-kes jenayah: Tinjauan umum &berdasarkan Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 356-361. https://doi. undang-undang keterangan islam. Malaysian Journal of Syariah islam. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7661 87-103. Webley
L. (2010). Chapter 38 qualitative to Baharuddin, empirical legal research. O Wan Ismail, W., Abdul Shukor, S., Hashim,approaches Hasnizam, & aches to empirical legal research. Oxford Handbook A.of S. (2018). Pembuktian melalui televisyen/kamera litar Empirical Legal Research (pp.927-950) Ed esearch (pp.927-950) Edition: 1st. tertutup (CCTV) dalam kes-kes jenayah: Tinjauan umum https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0039 99542475.013.0039 berdasarkan undang-undang keterangan islam. Malaysian Zaharah
Hussin. (2008). Reka bentuk kandungan kurikulum pendidikan akhlak Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), 87-103. ngan kurikulum pendidikan akhlak untuk latihan perguruan pendidikan Islam. (Ph.D), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bang WebleyMalaysia,
L. (2010).Bangi. Chapter 38 qualitative approaches to empirical iversiti Kebangsaan Zuha R. M., & Rajamanickam, R.Handbook (2017). Entomologi forensik sebagai keteranga legal research. Oxford of Empirical Legal omologi forensik sebagai keterangan saintifik. Law Review 2017(1), 36-45.Edition: 1st. https://doi.org/10.1093/ Research (pp.927-950) oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0039
Zaharah Hussin. (2008). Reka bentuk kandungan kurikulum pendidikan akhlak untuk latihan perguruan pendidikan Islam. (Ph.D), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
Zuha R. M., & Rajamanickam, R. (2017). Entomologi forensik sebagai keterangan saintifik. Law Review 2017(1), 36-45.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- OpenAlex 2 View →
- Semantic Scholar 2 View →
- OpenCitations 2 View →
- Crossref 2 View →
- Scopus 1 View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
