Regulating Biosafety of Genetically Modified Crops in Indonesia: Limits and Challenges

Authors

  • Muhammad Bahrul Ulum Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.1.7

Keywords:

Biosafety, GM Crops, Precautionary Principle

Abstract

The global use of genetically modified (GM) crops is rapidly expanding. While the advent of this agricultural biotechnology offers new promises to cater to the rising demand for Indonesia’s food security, the government should ensure its safety. This paper examines the regulatory regime over biosafety in Indonesia by considering the global fragmentation of biosafety regulation that debates its impact on environmental and health aspects. After Indonesia ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which both specifically become the global guideline on how domestic biosafety policies are regulated, environmental and health issues are among the priorities which the use of GM crops contests to the precautionary approach. Amidst the insufficient scientific ground on its safety, GM crops' use is supposed to result in adverse impacts, and the suspicion over the safety of such a new cutting-edge agricultural technology ended with a series of rejections. This paper's results reveal that amongst the global contention over the regulatory regime on biosafety, which resulted in the bifurcation of the biosafety regulation, Indonesia has added to the new polarization. This polarization includes the release of GM crops certification, and Indonesia's desire to regulating biosafety deliberates over the definition and translation of biosafety in the domestic regulatory regime against the global regulatory diversity of biosafety.

References

Ames, G. C. W. (2001). Bananas, beef, and biotechnology: Three contentious US-EU trade disputes. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 23(1), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1058-7195.00056

Azadi, H., & Ho, P. (2010). Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: A review of options for food security. Biotechnology Advances, 28(1), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.003

Bahagiawati, B., & Sutrisno, S. (2007). Pemanfaatan tanaman hasil rekayasa genetik: Status, regulasi, dan metode deteksi di Indonesia. Jurnal AgroBiogen, 3(1), 40–48.

Bang, G. (2011). Signed but not ratified: Limits to US participation in international environmental agreements. Review of Policy Research, 28(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00479.x

Barboza, D. (2003, February 21). Development of biotech crops is booming in Asia. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes. com/2003/02/21/world/development-of-biotech-crops-is-booming-in-asia.html

Blomquist, R. F. (2002). Ratification resisted: Understanding America’s response to the convention on biological diversity, 1989-2002. Golden Gate UL Rev., 32, 493.

Chowdhury, N., & Sabhapandit, S. (2007). The legal regime for application of the precautionary principle in India: Future directions for the GM regulatory regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 7(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9047-1

Eggers, B., & Mackenzie, R. (2000). The Cartagena protocol on biosafety. Journal of International Economic Law, 3(3), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/3.3.525

Estiati, A., & Herman, M. (2016). Regulasi keamanan hayati produk rekayasa genetik di Indonesia. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 13(2), 129–146.

Falkner, R., & Gupta, A. (2009). The limits of regulatory convergence: Globalization and GMO politics in the south. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-009-9094-x

Food and Agricultural Organization. (2018). The state of food security and nutrition in the world. http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/en/

Ganpat, W. G., Dyer, R., & Isaac, W. A. P. (Eds.). (2016). Agricultural development and food security in developing nations. IGI Global.

Indonesia Agriculture Ministry argues case for GMO foods. (2013, November 14). Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/news/ indonesia-agriculture-ministry-argues-case-for-gmo-foods/

Jaffe, G. (2004). Regulating transgenic crops: A comparative analysis of different regulatory processes. Transgenic Research, 13(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRAG.0000017198.80801.fb

Kelemen, R. D. (2010). Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003662065

Mechlem, K. (2010). Agricultural biotechnologies, transgenic crops and the poor: Opportunities and challenges. Human Rights Law Review, 10(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq035

Paarlberg, R. (2014). A dubious success: The NGO campaign against GMOs. GM Crops & Food, 5(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.4 161/21645698.2014.952204

Picut, C. A., & Parker, G. A. (1992). Interpreting the Delaney clause in the 21st century. Toxicologic Pathology, 20(4), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/019262339202000409

Puttagunta, P. S. (2001). The precautionary principle in the regulation of genetically modified organisms. Health Law Review, 9(2), 27–34.

Rubin, O. (2019). The precarious state of famine research. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(8), 1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00220388.2018.1493196

Sandin, P. (2006). The precautionary principle and food safety. Journal Für Verbraucherschutz Und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 1(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-006-0002-9

Sands, D. C., Morris, C. E., Dratz, E. A., & Pilgeram, A. (2009). Elevating optimal human nutrition to a central goal of plant breeding and production of plant-based foods. Plant Science: An International Journal of Experimental Plant Biology, 117(5), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.07.011

Webb, P., Coates, J., Frongillo, E. A., Rogers, B. L., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006). Measuring household food insecurity: Why it’s so important and yet so difficult to do. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(5), 1404S–1408S.

Weiss, C. (2003). Scientific uncertainty and science-based precaution. International Environmental Agreements, 3(2), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024847807590

Wells, M. (1999). Investing in biodiversity: A review of Indonesia’s integrated conservation and development projects. World Bank Publications.

Wibisana, A. G. (2011). The development of the precautionary principle in international and in Indonesian environmental law. Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L., 14, 169.

Zerbe, N. (2004). Feeding the famine? American food aid and the GMO debate in Southern Africa. Food Policy, 29(6), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.09.002

Downloads

Published

31-01-2021

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UUMJLS) Vol. 12(1), January 2021

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ulum, M. B. (2021). Regulating Biosafety of Genetically Modified Crops in Indonesia: Limits and Challenges. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.1.7

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-26
1 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/uumjls2021.12.1.7 OpenAlex W3129763123 Semantic Scholar CorpusID 234068480 Scopus 85101105706