Multivariate Analysis on the Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Fiji

Authors

  • Jauhari Dahalan Faculty of Economics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • T.K. Jayaraman Economics Department University of the South Pacific, Fiji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2006.10.5

Keywords:

Vector autoregressive, Co-integration, Variance decomposition, Impulse response function

Abstract

By utilising a Cointegrating Vector Autoregressive Model, this paper assesses the relative effectiveness the fiscal and monetary policies on growth. It is observed that government expenditure has the strongest effect on Fiji’s national income which significantly explains Fiji’s GDP error variance even after a three year period with regard to the effect of shocks, we observed that the national income impulse respons to the one standard error shock among all macroeconomic variables, i.e. government expenditure and foreign assets, which is not permanent but transitory.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2003). Key indicators 2003. Manila: ADB.

ADB (2001). Financial sector development in pacific island economies. Manila: ADB. http://mmj.uum.edu.my

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (1998a). Improving growth prospects in the Pacific. Manila: ADB.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (1998b). Reform in the Pacific: An assessment of ADB’s assisatnce for reform programmes in the Pacific. Manila: ADB

Andersen, L. C. & Jordan, J. L. (1968). Monetary and fisacl actions: A test of their relative importance in economic stabilization. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 50 (10), 11-24.

Bynoe, A. (1994). Money and fiscal influences on economic activity in African countries. African Review of Money, Finance and Banking, 12 (1), 63-71.

Cheung, Y. W. & Lai, K. S. (1993). Finite-sample sizes of Johansen’s Likelihood Ratio Tests for cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 55, 313-328.

Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74 (366), 1057-1072.

Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testin. Econometrica, 55, 251-276.

Fuller, W. A. (1976). Introduction to statistical time series. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Ghali, K. H. (1998). Government size and economic growth: Evidence from a multivariate cointegration analysis. Applied Economics, 31, 975-987.

Granger, C. W. J. & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.

Huang, C. J. & Chia, F. (2006). Testing wagner’s law using bounds test and a new granger non-causality test: Evidence for Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8 (2), 86-90.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2003). International Financial Statistics Yearbook 2003. Washington D.C: IMF.

Chowdhury, A. (1986). Monetary policy, fiscal policy and aggregate economic activity: Some further evidence. Applied Economics, 20 (1), 63-71.

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59 (6), 1551-1580.

Darrat, C. (1984). The dominant influence of fiscal action in the developing countries. Eastern Economic Journal, 10 (3), 271-284.

Johansen, S. (2000). Modelling of cointegration in the vector autoregressive model. Economic Modelling, 17, 359-373.

Deere, C. (1990). In the shadow of the caribbean sun. Denver, Colorado: Westview Press.

Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057-1072.

Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). The full information maximum likelihood procedure for inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52 (2), 169-211. Malaysian Management Journal 10 (1 & 2), 67-81 (2006)

Jordan, A., Craigwell, R. & Carter, A. (2000). The potency of monetary and fiscal policies in caribbean countries: A cointegrating VAR approach. Savings and Development, 24 (3), 325-342. http://mmj.uum.edu.my

Kasa, K. (1992). Common stochastic trends in international stock markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26 (3), 636-376.

Landau, D. (1983). Government expenditure and economic growth: A cross-section study. Southern Economic Journal, 49, 783-792. Economics and Statistics, 54 (3), 461472.

Osmond, D. (1992). The potency of monetary and fiscal policies in Sub-Saharan Countries: St. Louis Model Estimate. African Review of Money and Banking, 1 (1), 17-27.

Ramos, F. F. R. (2001). Exports, importd, and economic growth in Portugal: Evidence from causality and cointegration analysis. Economic Modelling, 18, 613-623.

Said, A. & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71, 599-607.

Loizides, J. & Vamvoukas, G. (2005). Government expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from trivariate causality testing. Journal of Applied Economics, 8 (1),125152.

Schwert, W. G. (1987). Effect of model specification on tests for unit roots in macroeconomic data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 20 (1), 73-103.

Osmond, D. (1992). The potency of monetary and fiscal policies in sub-saharan countries: St. Louis Model Estimate. African Review of Money and Banking, 1 (1), 17-27.

Serletis, A. & King, M. (1997). Common stochastic tends and convergence of European Union stock markets. The Manchester School, 65 (1), 44-57.

Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A note with quartiles as the asymptotic distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2004). Economic and Social Survey 2004. Bangkok: UNESCAP. Malaysian Management Journal 10 (1 & 2), 67-81 (2006)

Downloads

Published

01-12-2006

How to Cite

Dahalan, J., & Jayaraman, T. (2006). Multivariate Analysis on the Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Fiji. Malaysian Management Journal, 10(1&2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2006.10.5

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mmj2006.10.5

Most read articles by the same author(s)