Attitude Towards Zakah on Employment Income : Comparing Outcomes Between Single Score and Multidimensional Scores
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2001.5.4Keywords:
Attitude, Zakah, Compliance Behaviour. 5 DAbstract
Downloads
References
Andreoni, J., Errard, B. & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Lit-erature, 36(2), 818-860
Bennett, S. & Bowers, D. (1976). An Introduc-tion to Multivariate Techniques for Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons
Bobek, D. (1997). Tax fairness How do indi-viduals judge fairness and what effect does It have on their behavior. Ph.D. Dis-sertation, University of Florida, Gainesville
Churchill, G.A. Jr. (1979). A paradigm for de-veloping better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73
Coakes,S.J. & Steed, L.G. (1999). SPSS Analysis Without Anguish. Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley & Sons
Dyer, J.E & Osborne, E.W. (1996). A factor analysis of attitudes of Illinois guidance counselors towards agriculture programs. From http://www.ssu.missouri.edu/ SSU/AGED/naerm/s-d-4.htm
Eriksen, K. & Fallan L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes toward taxation: a report on a quasi experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387-402
Fischer, C.M., Wartick, M., & Mark, M.M. (1992). Detection probability and taxpayer compliance A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 11, 1-46
Hair, et al. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
Hajah Mustafa, M.H. (1996). An evaluation of the Malaysian tax administrative system, and taxpayer’s perceptions towards as-sessment system, tax law fairness, and tax law complexity. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Jackson, B.R. & Milliron, V.C. (1986). Tax com-pliance research: findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125-165
Johnson, R. A. & Wichern, D. W. (1992). Ap-plied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (3rd. ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
Kim, J.O. & Mueller, C.W. (1978). Factor Analy-sis Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication
Lawver, D.E. & Fraze,S.D. (1996). Factor analy-sis of variables related to student atti-tudes and perceptions concerning agri-cultural mechanics laboratory safety. From http://www.ssu.missouri.edu/ SSU/AGED/naerm/s-k-1.htm
Lewis, A. (1982). The Psychology of Taxation. Oxford: Martin Robertson. Malaysian Management Journal 5 (1&2), 47-63 (2001) DO
Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. London: Sage Publication
Mueller, D.J. (1986). Measuring Social Attitudes. Columbia University, New York: Teach-ers College
Mujaini Tarimin (1995). Zakat penggajian Satu penilaian terbaru di Malaysia. Tesis é PhD, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia. u Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Oo)
Oskamp, S. (1991). Attitudes and Opinions (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
Peter, J.P. (1981, May). Construct validity A review of basicissues and marketing prac-tices. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 52-7..UUM sse=dekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Busi-ness. New York: John Wiley & Sons. //mm http
Sherif, M. & Hovland, C.L (1961). Social judge-ment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven: Yale University Press
Silver, D.P. (1995). Tax compliance and tax-payer attitude Over the last forty years, this country has experienced a taxpayer revolt. National Public Accountant, 40 (11), 32-35
Spicer, M. W. & Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Under-standing tax evasion. Public Finance, 31 (2), 295-305
Sutinen, J.G. & Kuperan K. (1999). A socioeco-nomic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics, 26 (1,2,3), 174-193
Tayib, M. (1998). The determinants of assess-ment tax collection The Malaysian local authority experience. PhD. Dissertation, University of Glamorgan. Malaysian Management Journal 5 (1&2), 47-63 (2001)
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- OpenCitations 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →







