Assessing the Predictability of Cryptocurrency Prices

Authors

  • Ruzita Abdul Rahim Centre for Global Business and Digital Economy StudiesFaculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia , Malaysia
  • Pick Soon Ling School of Business and Management, University College of Technology Sarawak , Malaysia
  • Muhammad Airil Syafiq Mohd Khalid School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia , Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.6

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency market efficiency, cryptocurrency predictability, cryptocurrency types, Payment altcoins, Platform altcoins

Abstract

The predictability of asset prices works against the notion of an efficient market where asset prices reflect all available and relevant information. This paper examined the predictability of Bitcoin and 51 other cryptocurrencies that have been classified into the following five categories: Application, Payment, Privacy, Platform, and Utility. Two market efficiency tests (Ljung-Box autocorrelation and Runs tests) were run on the daily returns of the 52 unique cryptocurrencies and the MSCI World index from 28 April 2013 to 30 June 2019. The results showed that Bitcoin was consistently efficient, whereas most of the other cryptocurrencies and even the MSCI World index were not, implying that their prices were predictable. Categorically, Payment altcoins were the most consistent in showing inefficiency. Since altcoins in this category also recorded the third highest risk-adjusted returns, investors with advanced technical trading strategies had a great chance of exploiting the market information to make extremely high abnormal returns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ruzita Abdul Rahim, Centre for Global Business and Digital Economy StudiesFaculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

    Chairperson

    Centre for Global Business and Digital Economy Studies

    Faculty of Economy and Management

    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

References

Aharon, D. Y., & Qadan, M. (2019). Bitcoin and the day-of-the-week effect. Finance Research Letters, 31, 127-136.

Ammous, S. (2018). Can cryptocurrencies fulfil the functions of money? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 70, 38-51.

Bariviera, A. F. (2017). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach. Economics Letters, 161, 1-4.

Brauneis, A., & Mestel, R. (2018). Price discovery of cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin and beyond. Economics Letters, 16, 58-61.

Bundi, N., & Wildi, M. (2019). Bitcoin and market-(in) efficiency: A systematic time series approach. Digital Finance, 1(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-019-00004-z Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 143-

Caporale, G. M., Gil-Alana, L., & Plastun, A. (2018). Persistence in the cryptocurrency market. Research in International Business and Finance, 46, 141-148.

Chan, S., Chu, J., Nadarajah, S., & Osterrieder, J. (2017). A statistical analysis of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Risk Financial Management, 10(2), 1-23.

Cheah, E. T., Mishra, T., Parhi, M., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Long memory interdependency and inefficiency in Bitcoin Markets. Economics Letters, 167, 18-25.

Corbet, S., Eraslan, V., Lucey, B., & Sensoy, A. (2019). The effectiveness of technical trading rules in cryptocurrency markets. Finance Research Letters, 31, 32-37.

Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya. L. (2018). Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters, 165, 28-34.

Danial, K. (2019). Cryptocurrency investing for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.

Demir, E., Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K. M., & Vigne, S. A. (2018). Does economic policy uncertainty predict the Bitcoin returns? An empirical investigation. Finance Research Letters, 26, 145-149.

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

Fauzel, S. (2016). A Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic approach for the assessment of weak-form efficiency and seasonality effect: Evidence from Mauritius. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 745-755.

Jiang, Y., He, N., & Ruan, W. (2018). Time-varying long-term memory in Bitcoin market. Finance Research Letters, 25, 280-284.

Katsiampa, P. (2017). Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters, 158, 3-6.

Kochling, G., Muller, J., & Posch, P. N. (2018). Does the introduction of futures improve the efficiency of Bitcoin? Finance Research Letters, 30, 367-370.

Kyriazis, N. A. (2019). Survey on efficiency and profitable trading opportunities in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 67(12), 1-17. Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 143-

Kristoufek, L. (2018). On Bitcoin markets (in) efficiency and its evolution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Application, 503, 257-262.

Kurihara, Y., & Fukushima, A. (2017). The market efficiency of Bitcoin: A weekly anomaly perspective. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 7(3), 57-64.

Lahmiri, S., Bekiros, S., & Salvi, A. (2018). Long-range memory, distributional variation and randomness of bitcoin volatility. Chos, Solitons and Fractals, 107, 43-48.

Ma, D., & Tanizaki, H. (2019). The day-of-the-week effect on Bitcoin return and volatility. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 127-136.

Mbanga, C. L. (2018). The day-of-the-week pattern of price clustering in Bitcoin. Applied Economics Letters. 26(10), 807-811.

Nadarajah, S., & Chu, J. (2017). On the inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 150, 6-9.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 1-9. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

Phillip, A., Chan, J. S. K., & Peiris, S. (2018). A new look at cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters, 163, 6-9.

Saiti, B., & Noordin, N. H. (2018). Does Islamic equity investment provide diversification benefits to conventional investors? Evidence from the multivariate GARCH analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(1), 267-289.

Selgin, G. (2015). Synthetic commodity money. Journal of Financial Stability, 17, 92-99.

Tiwari, A. K., Jana, R. K., Das, D., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Informational efficiency of Bitcoin – An extension. Economics Letters, 163, 106-109.

Troster, V., Tiwari, A. K., Shahbaz, M., & Macedo, D. N. (2018). Bitcoin returns and risk: A general GARCH and GAS analysis. Finance Research Letters, 30, 187-193.

Urquhart, A. (2016). The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letter, 148, 80-82.

Vidal-Tomas, D., Ibanez, A. M., & Farinos, J. E. (2019). Weak efficiency of the cryptocurrency market: A market portfolio approach. Applied Economics Letters, 26(19), 1627-1633. Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 143-

Wei, W. C. (2018). Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters, 168, 21-24.

Zargar, F. N., & Kumar, D. (2019). Informational inefficiency of Bitcoin: A study based on high-frequency data. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 344-353.

Zhang, W., Wang, P., Li, X., & Shen, D. (2018). The inefficiency of cryptocurrency and its cross-correlation with Dow Jones Industrial Average. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 510, 658-670. Malaysian Management Journal, 25 (July) 2021, pp: 143-

Downloads

Published

09-07-2021

How to Cite

Abdul Rahim, R., Ling , P. S., & Mohd Khalid, M. A. S. (2021). Assessing the Predictability of Cryptocurrency Prices. Malaysian Management Journal, 25, 143-168. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.6

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
1 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mmj2021.25.6 OpenAlex W3185924170