Fiscal Policy, Institutions, and Economic Growth in Asian Countries: Evidence from Pedroni’s Cointegration Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2008.12.6Keywords:
Economic Growth, Institutions, Aggregate of Government Expenditure, Aggregate of Fiscal Policy, Panel Cointegration, FMOLSAbstract
Downloads
References
Al-Awad, M., & Harb, N. (2005). Financial development and economic growth in the Middle East. Applied Financial Economics, 15, 1041-1051.
Barro, R.J. (1996). Democracy and growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1), 1-27.
Benabou, R. (1996). Heterogeneity, stratification and growth: Macroeconomic implications of community structure and school finance. American Economic Review, 86, 584-609.
Benos, K. (2005). Fiscal policy and economic growth: Empirical evidence from OECD Countries. University of Cyprus, Discussion Paper 2005-01.
Blume L. (1993). The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction, Games and Economic Behaviour, 5, 387-424.
Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J.W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45, 115–135.
Brock, W., & Durlauf, S. (2001). Discrete choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies, 68, 235-260.
Campbell, J.Y., & Perron, P. (1991). Pitfalls and opportunities: What macroeconomists should know about unit roots. NBER: Macroeconomics Annual, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Caselli, F., Esquivel, G., & Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 363-389.
Chen, P., & Gupta, R. (2006). An investigation of openness and economic growth using panel estimation, University of Pretoria, Working Paper 2006-22.
Christopoulos, D.K., & Tsionas, E.G. (2003). Testing the Buchaman-Wagner hypothesis: European evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Public Choice 115, 439-453.
Clague, C. (1993). Rule obedience, organizational loyalty, and economic development. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149(2), 393-414.
Coiteux, M., & Olivier, S. (2000). The saving retention coefficient in the long run and in the short run: Eviden from panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 19, 535-548.
Demetriades, P., & Law, S.H. (2006). Finance, institutions and economic development. International Journal of Finanace and Economics, 11, 1-16.
Durlauf. S. (1990). Locally interacting systems, coordination failure, and the behaviour of aggregate activity, Working Paper, Stanford University. http://mmj.uum.edu.my
Eller, M., Haiss, P., & Steiner, K. (2006). Foreign direct investment in the financial sector and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe: The crucial role of the efficiency channel. Emerging Market Review 7, 300-319.
Ellison, G. (1993). Learning, local interaction and coordination, Econometrica, 61, 1047-1072.
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203-1250.
Gangopadhyay, S., & Chatterji, A. (2005). Economic globalization in Asia. Ashgate Publishing.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Block, W. (1996). Economic freedom of the world: 19751995. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
Gerson, P. (1998). The impact of fiscal policy variables on output growth. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper 98/1.
Ghura, D., & Hadjimichael, M.T. (1996). Growth in Sub-Saharan African. IMF Staff Paper, 43, 605-635.
Hoeffler A.K. (2002). The augmented Solow Model and the African growth debate. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 64(2), 0305-9049.
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., & Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Discussion Paper, University of Cambridge, December.
Islam, N. (1995). Growth Empirics: A panel data approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1127-1170.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economic and Politics, 7(3), 207-227.
Kneller, R., Bleaney M. F., & Kneller, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Public Economics 74, 171-190.
Knight, M., Loayza, N. & Villanueva, D. (1993). Testing the neoclassical theory of economic Growth, a panel data approach. International Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 40(3).
Law, S.H., & Demetriades, P. (2006). Openness, institutions and financial development, World Economy and Finance Research Programme, Working Paper Series WEF 0012.
Leblang, D.A. (1996). Property rights, democracy and economic growth. Political Research Quarterly, 49(1), 5-26.
Lee, C., & Chang, C. (2006). Social security expenditures and economic growth: A heterogeneous panel application. Journal of Economic Studies, 33 (5), 386-404.
Levin, A., Lin, C.F., & Chu, J. (2002). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53 (1), 69-105.
Maddala, G.S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631-652.
Macdonald, R., & Nagayasu, J. (2000). The longrun relationship between real exchange rates and real interest rate differentials: A panel study. IMF Staff Paper 47(1), International Monetary Fund.
Mankiw, G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407-437.
McCoskey, S.K., & Selden, T.M. (1998). Health care expenditures and GDP: Panel data unit root test results. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 369-376.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic perfromance. Cambridge University Press.
North, D.C., & Thomas, R.P. (1973). The rise of the Western World: A new economic history. Cambridge University Press. http://mmj.uum.edu.my
Oh, K. Kim, B., Kim, H., & Ahn, B. (1999). Savings-investment cointegration in panel data. Applied Economics Letters, 6, 477-472.
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite samples properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597-625.
Pedroni, P. (1996). Fully modified OLS for heterogenous cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity. Working paper, North American Econometric Society Summer Meeting.
Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Special Issue, 61, 653-678.
Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727731.
Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegration panel in nonstationary panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93-130.
Phillips, P.C.B., & Hansen, B.E. (1990). Statistical inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I (1) Processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99-
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernisation theories and facts. World Politics, 49,155-183.
Ramirez, M.D., & Nazmi, N. (2003). Public investment and economic growth in Latin America: An empirical test. Review of Development Economics, 7, 115-Rodrik, D., Subramaniam, A., & Trebbi, F. (2002). Institution rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and intergration economic development. NBER Working Paper 9305.
Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell, J.E. (1986). The economic transformation of the industrial world. New York, Basic Books.
Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria. NBER Working Paper No. 9804. NBER, Cambridge, MA.
Tanzi, V., & Zee, H. (1997). Fiscal policy and long-run growth. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 44, 65-94.
Zagler, M., & Dürnecker, G. (2003). Fiscal policy and economic growth. Journal of Economic Survey, 17(3), 397-418.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.







