Disclosure Practices Among Unit Trust Funds in Malaysia

Authors

  • Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Shamsul Nahar Abdullah School of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mahamad Tayib School of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nor Asma Lode School of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2001.5.5

Abstract

This study examined the level of transparency among unit trust funds in Malaysia. Unit trust funds were the focus of this study due to its nature: unique, heavily regulated and rapidly growing. The study investigated the extent of disclosure in relation to the various mandatory and voluntary requirements and the roles of the specific characteristics of trust funds in explaining their level of disclosure in the annual reports. The findings showed that the level of disclosure increased rapidly within the period of study suggesting that trust funds were becoming more transparent. With regard to the funds' specific characteristics, the study showed that the influence was not consistent. The model best explained the disclosure level during the pre-mandatory period, i.e. 1996. During this year, the variables 'sponsor of the fund' and 'auditors' significantly influenced the disclosure level in the predicted direction. In the other years (1997 and 1998), the explanatory power of the model was very low as suggested by the significant reduction in the adjusted R2. One argument was that during this period, the revised Guidelines had been issued and thus the model could not explain much the variation in the disclosure level as a large amount of the items in the study were already mandated.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, K. & Nicholls, D. (1994). The impact of non-financial company characteristics on mandatory disclosure compliance in de-veloping countries The case of Bangla-desh. The International Journal of Account-ing, 29(1): 62-77

Atiase, R.K., Babber, L.S. & Freeman, R.N. (1988). Accounting disclosure based on company size Regulations and capital market evidence. Accounting Horizons, 2(1): 18-27

Azhar Abdul Rahman (1998). Disclosure of Corporate Financial Information in Malay-sia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne. Malaysian Management Journal 5 (1&2), 65-87 (2001)

Barrett, M.E. (1976). Disclosure and compre-hensiveness in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 14: 10-26. Becker, C.L., Defond, M., Jiambalvo LJ

Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. 5 Buzby, S.L. (1974). Selected items of infor-DO u

Cerf, A.R. (1961). Corporate Reporting and In-vestment Decisions. University of Califor

Collier. P. & Gregory, A. (1996). Audit com-mittee effectiveness and the audit fees. European Accounting Review, 5: 177-198

Cooke, T.E. (1989). Disclosure in the corporate annual report of Swedish companies. Ac-counting and Business Research, 19 (74): 113-124

Cooke, T.E. (1991). An assessment of volun-tary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations. The International Journal of Accounting, 26(3): 174-189

DeAngelo, L.E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Econom-ics, 3 (December): 183-199

Evans, T.G. & Taylor, M.E. (1982). Bottom-line Compliance with the IASC A compara-tive analysis. International Journal of Ac-counting, (Fall): 115-28

Firer, C. & Meth, G. (1986). Information disclo-sure in annual reports in South Africa. Omega, 14(5): 373-382

Firth, M. (1979). The impact of size, stock market listing, and auditors on volun-tary disclosure in corporate annual re-ports. Accounting and Business Research, (Autumn): 273-280

Frost, C.A. & Pownall, G. (1994). Accounting disclosure practices in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Ac-counting Research, 32(Spring): 75-102

Gibbins, M., Richardson, A. & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate fi-nancial disclosure Opportunism, ritual-ism, policies, and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1): 121-143. Malaysian Management Journal 5 (1&2), 65-87 (2001) http

Hashanah Ismail (1999). GP8 A Study in mandatory disclosure effectiveness. Bank-er’s Journal Malaysia, 110june): 29-32

Hossain, M. & Adams, M. (1995). Anempirical study of voluntary financial disclosure by Australian listed companies. Akauntan Nasional, (July): 12-14

Hossain, M., Lin, M.T. & Adams, M. (1994). Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capi-talmarket: Some empirical evidence from companies listed on the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange. The International Journal of Accounting, 29(4): 334-351

Hussein, M. (1992). The cultural context of financial reporting The case of the US and the Netherlands. International Ac-counting Research Conference, (Autumn): 253-264. Ku Nor Izah, K.I. & Shamsul Nahar Abdullah (1998). Mandatory disclosure in the cor-porate annual reports of general insurers in Malaysia. ANALISIS, 5(1&2): 47-66. & Zuaini I. (1995). Usefulness of annual report disclosure An investiga-tion on investment analysts. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Universiti Utara Ma-laysia 1995

Malaysian Accounting Standards Board (1998). Draft Statement of Principles 2 Financial Reporting by Unit Trusts, Kuala Lumpur

McKinnon, S.M. & Janell, P. (1984). The inter-national accounting standards commit-tee A performance evaluation. Interna-tional Journal of Accounting, (Spring): 19-34

Normah Haji Omar & Abu Bakar, S. (1995). A study on voluntary disclosure practices of public listed companies. Proceedings Accounting Education and the Profession Past, Present and Future, (January). Shah Alam, Malaysia: MARA Institute of Tech-nology

Marston, C. & Robson, P. (1997). Financial reporting in India Changes in disclosure over the period 1982 to 1990. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 4(1): 109-140

O’Sullivan, N. (2000). The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality Evidence from large UK compa-nies. British Accounting Review, 32: 397-414

Purvis, S.E. (1991). The IASC and the compa-rability project Prerequisites for success. Accounting Horizons, (June): 25-44

Razani Radzi (2000). Adequacy of financial disclosure Financial analyst’s perspec-tives. Paper presented at Seminar on Fi-nancial Reporting, Kuala Lumpur: 28 March 2000

Securities Commission (1994). Guidelines on Unit Trust Funds, Kuala Lumpur

Securities Commission (1997). Guidelines on Unit Trust Funds, Kuala Lumpur. Malaysian Management Journal 5 (1&2), 65-87 (2001)

Shaari Isa (1997). Voluntary disclosures How useful? Australian Accountant, 67(6): 50-53

Singhvi, S.S. (1968). Characteristics and impli-cations of inadequate disclosure A case Ss study of India. The International Journal of Accounting: 29-43. E & Desai, H.B. (1971). An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate finan-cial disclosure. The Accounting Review (January): 129-138. ed

Lau, L.W.C. (1990). Non-compliance with j.uum //mm http disclosure requirements in financial state-ments The case of Hong Kong compa-nies. The International Journal of Account-ing, 25(2): 99-112

Wallace, R.S.O. (1988). Corporate financial re-porting in Nigeria. Accounting and Busi-ness Research, 18: 352-362

Wallace, R.S.O. & Naser, K. (1995). Firm-spe-cific determinants of the comprehensive-ness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14 (4): 311-368

Watts, R.L. & Zimmerman, J.L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Malaysian Management Journal 5 (1&2), 65-87 (2001)

Downloads

Published

01-12-2001

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1&2 (2001): Malaysian Management Journal (MMJ) Vol. 5 No. 1&2 June/December 2001

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ku Ismail, K. N. I., Abdullah, S. N., Tayib, M., & Lode, N. A. (2001). Disclosure Practices Among Unit Trust Funds in Malaysia. Malaysian Management Journal, 5(1&2), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2001.5.5

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mmj2001.5.5

Most read articles by the same author(s)