Ideology and Power Dynamics in President Trump's Farewell Address: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Ridha  Rouabhia; Nayef Jomaa Jomaa

doi:10.32890/mjoal2023.1.4

Authors

Ridha Rouabhia Karabuk University, Türkiye
Nayef Jomaa Jomaa University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjoal2023.1.4

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, Donald Trump, farewell address, ideology, power dynamics

Abstract

This analysis focuses on President Trump's Farewell Address, utilizing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Fairclough's Three-Dimensional Model. Its objective is to examine the rhetorical strategies employed in the address, such as repetition, hyperbolic language, antithesis, and narrative structure. The analysis also takes into account sociocultural context factors along with power dynamics and ideological positioning evident in the address. The findings highlighted how language choices impact persuasion within political discourse by constructing a cohesive message that reinforces American values while inspiring hope for future endeavours. However, it is important to note that this analysis only focuses on a single case study without comparing President Trump's discourse with other political figures' speeches or statements. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of his communication style and strategies, future research could expand its scope by incorporating a wider range of speeches from different contexts considering sociocultural factors with multiple perspectives.

References

Al Dilaimy, H., Al-Rawe, M., & Suleiman, S. (2022). Donald Trump’s aggressive and offensive language before and after his inauguration speeches: A critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(1), 1-9.

Armayanti, R. (2019). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) on qualitative research: A review. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 1(1), 29-34.

Awawdeh, N. A. A. F. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of President Donald Trump’s Speeches during the Coronavirus Pandemic Crisis. (Unpublished Master's thesis in Middle East University, Amman, Jordan).

Bhatia, V. K. (2013). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Routledge.

Bonner, M. (2021). What is punitive populism? A typology based in media communication. MATRIZes, 15(1), 77-102.

Bracciale, R., & Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: the case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1310-1329.

Fernandez, M. C. (2022). A corpus discourse analysis of Donald Trump's speeches between 2015 and 2022. Qantu Yachay, 2(1), 147-166.

Diehl, P. (2022). For a complex concept of populism. Polity, 54(3), 509-518.

Ghaderinezhad, B. (2015). On the relationship between language and ideology represented in the CDA texts. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 878-889.

Irawan, A. M., & Adnan, Z. (2018). Locating critical discourse analysis (CDA) in discourse and social studies. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 1(2), 127-139.

Jomaa, N. (2019). Multiple approaches to analysing academic discourses: similarities and differences. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 1(1), 1-14.

Nahrkhalaji, S. S. (2007). Language, Ideology and Power: a Critical Approach to Political Discourse. 1st National Conference of Language, Discourse and Pragmatics, Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.

Saedeen, M., & AlBzour, N. N. (2022). Donald Trump’s denial speeches of the 2020 United States presidential election’s results: A critical discourse analysis perspective. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 13(1), 32-40.

Santosa, R. (2016). Critical discourse analysis (CDA): Systemic functional linguistics (SFL). In PRASASTI: CONFERENCE SERIES (pp. 46-57).

Susanto, J., Satria, R., & Rosa, C. H. (2022). Donald J. Trump’s speech on the Orlando shooting: Critical discourse analysis. Professional Discourse & Communication, 4(3), 19-28.