Realization of the Speech Act of Refusals Among Malay Esl Students

Authors

  • Norma Saad School of Languages, Civilisation & Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Siti Jamilah Bidin School of Languages, Civilisation & Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Affendi Shabdin School of Languages, Civilisation & Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jps2022.24.2

Keywords:

Refusal strategies, Semantic refusal Formula, Speech act of request, Open role-play, English as a second language

Abstract

Refusing to participate in an action is a negative response that might lead to a dispute and jeopardise the connection between the hearer and the speaker. To avoid the conflict that may arise when a speaker must decline a request, the speaker must offer an acceptable refusal and adjust to the position of the interlocutor as well as the circumstances of the situation. This study examined the strategies and sequence order of the strategies employed by Malay speakers of English as a second language (MSE) when they refused requests made by higher and equal status interlocutors. Twelve MSE undergraduates from a local university participated in the study. Data were collected using an open role-play which were transcribed, classified into semantic refusal strategies (Beebe et al., 1990) and categorized into the types of sequence orders of the strategies. The findings revealed that the MSE preferred indirect strategies when refusing higher and equal status interlocutors’ requests. When using direct strategies, they opted for lesser and the least degree of directness. The sequence orders of the strategies employed to refuse both interlocutors were also similar; immediate refusal and delayed refusal. However, they deferred in terms of their preference between the two types of sequence orders and the specific strategies used in the pre-refusal, head act and post-refusal.  These variations show their effort to adapt to the status of their interlocutors; higher and equal status and the given situations.  Their use of strategies at the post-refusal for both interlocutors were varied and lengthier compared to the sequence orders revealed in the previous studies. The findings reflect the participants’ effort to search for equilibrium between upholding their stance and at the same time remain respectful in the case of their employer and being concerned toward their friend. These findings provide pragmatic input which could be utilized by English language teachers to develop their students’ ability to use socially appropriate language for the situation they encounter in the Malaysian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adegbija, E. (1989). A comparative study of politeness phenomena in Nigerian English, Yoruba and Ogori. Multilingua, 8, 57-80.

Al Kahtani, W. (2006). Refusals realizations in three different cultures: A speech act theoretically-based cross-cultural study. Journal of King Saud University, 18, 35-57.

Al-Khatib, M. (2006). The pragmatics of invitation making and acceptance in Jordanian society. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 272-294.

Al-Issa, A. (1998). Sociopragmatic transfer in the performance of refusals by Jordanian EFL Learners: Evidence and motivating factors. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania).

Al-Shboul, Marlyna Maros & Mohamad Subakir Mohd Yasin. (2012). An intercultural study of refusal strategies in English between Jordanian EFL and Malay ESL postgraduate students. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(3), 29-39.

Asmah Haji Omar. (2000). Wacana perbincangan, perbahasan dan perundingan. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.

Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, Anderson, E; & Krashen, S. (Eds.), Development of communicative competence in a second language (pp.55-73). Newbury House.

Billmyer, K., & Varghese, M. (2000). Investigating instrumentbased pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics, 21, 517-552.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Crosscultural pragmatics: request and apologies. Ablex.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge University Press.

Chen, H. J. (1996). Cross-cultural comparison of English and Chinese metapragmatics in refusal. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University).

Cohen, A. D. (2004). The interface between interlanguage pragmatics and assessment. Proceeding of the 3rd Annual JALT PanSIG Conference May 22-23, 2004 (pp. 1-7). Tokyo Keizai University.

Dippold, D. (2008). Reframing one experience: Face, identity, and roles in L2 argumentative discourse. In M. Putz & J.A Neff-van (Es.) Developing contrastive pragmatics. Interlanguage and cross-cultural perspective (pp 131-154). Mouton de Gruyter.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press. Farhana Muslim Mohd Jalis, Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabar, Hazlina

Abdul Halim & Jürgen Martin Bukhardt. (2019). Refusal strategy used by Malay and German native speakers to refuse requests. Asian Social Science, 15(4), 49-59.

Farnia, M., & Wu, X. (2012). An intercultural communication study of Chinese and Malay university students’ refusal to invitation. International Journal of English Linguistics 2(1), 162-176

Felix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2004). Refusals in Spanish: A cross-cultural study of politeness strategies among speakers of Mexican Spanish, American English, and American learners of Spanish as a foreign language. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Minnesota).

Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross study of Japanese-English. Mouton de Gruyter.

Keller, M. (2013, June) Social Media and Interpersonal Communication. Social Work Today, 13, 10-21.

Khadijah Ibrahim. (1993). Politeness in Malay directive. (Unpublished Master’s dissertation. University of Malaya).

Kreishan, L. (2018). Politeness and speech acts of refusal and complaint among Jordanian undergraduate students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 68-76.

Kuang, C. H. (2009). Moves in refusal: How Malaysians say ‘No’. China Media Research, 5(3), 31-44.

Lakoff, G. (1973). The logic of politeness, or, minding your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 292-305.

Margalef-Boada, T. (1993). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics: An inquiry into data collection procedures. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University).

Marquez-Reiter, R. (2000). Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A contrastive study of request and apologies. John Benjamins.

Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Norma Saad. (2016). Refusal and linguistics politeness: A comparative study of Malay speakers and Native speakers of English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universiti Utara Malaysia).

Nur Asyrani binti Che Ismail. (2018, January). Politeness Strategies and Gender Differences in the Speech Act of Rejection among the Malays in Malaysia. Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning (SALTeL) Journal 1(1), 1-7.

Radhiah Binti Ismail. (2017).The difference of speech act of refusal strategies between the Malays and Spanish: Cross-Cultural Studies. The Social Sciences, 12(8), 1334-1343.

Rubin, J. (1983). How to tell when someone is saying “no” revisited. In N.Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 254-267). Newbury House Publishing.

Saud, W. I. (2019). Refusal strategies of Saudi EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue: The Dynamics of EFL in Saudi Arabia, 96-114. https://dx.doi. org/10.24093/awej/efl1.8

Sattar, H. O., & Farnia, M. (2014). Iraqis’ and Malays’ refusal to invitations. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 0-19.

Shareef, D. M., Qyrio, I. M. & Ali, N. C. (2018). An investigation of refusal strategies as used by Bahdini Kurdish and Syriac Aramaic. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9 (1), 90-100.

Suraya Amirrudin & Nabilah Badarus Salleh. (2016). Refusal strategies in English among Malay ESL students. Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal, 4(1), 30-40.

Walaszewska, E. & Piskorska, A. (Eds.). (2012). Relevance theory: More than understanding. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Wierzbicka, A. (1987). English speech verbs: A semantic dictionary. Academic Press.

Yule, G.1996. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

14-03-2022

How to Cite

Saad, N., Bidin, S. J., & Shabdin, A. A. (2022). Realization of the Speech Act of Refusals Among Malay Esl Students. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 24, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.32890/jps2022.24.2