A Quest for Defining Terrorism in International Law: The Emerging Consensus

Authors

  • Mohammed Salman Mahmood School of Law UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2014.10.5

Keywords:

International law, international terrorism, terrorism, liberation, self-determination

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) has no internationally-agreed definition of terrorism. The definitional impasse has prevented the adoption of a Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism. Even in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 the UN failed to adopt the Convention, and the deadlock continues to this day. The prime reason is the standoff with the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). The Arab Terrorism Convention and the Terrorism Convention of the Organization of the Islamic Conference defines terrorism to exclude armed struggle for liberation and self-determination. This increased its complexity and vagueness. The aim of this paper is to examine the definitional aspect of terrorism and the challenges faced in adopting a single universally accepted definition by the international community. The methodology adopted in this paper is purely a library based research focusing mainly on primary and secondary sources. The paper concludes that nations or states have to come to agreement on a definition of the term “terrorismâ€, for without a consensus of what constitute terrorism, nations or states could not unite against it. A general definition of terrorism is necessary in order for the international community to fight against terrorism in a precise way.

 

References

Adam, R. (2005). The war on terror in historical perspective. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 47(2), 101-130. Retrieved from http://www.iiss.org/en/publications/ survival/sections/2005-9d59/survival-global-politics-and-strategy-summer-20053623/05-roberts-fb0e

Begorre-Bret, C. (1988). The definition of terrorism and the challenge of relativism. Cardozo Law Review, 27(5), 1987-2004.

Carlton, D., & Schaerf, C. (1975). International terrorism and world security. London: Croom Helm Press.

Cassese, A. (2003). International criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dugard, J. (1974). International terrorism: Problems of definition. International Affairs, 50(1), 67-81.

Dumitriu, E. (2005). The EUs definition of terrorism: The council framework decision on combating terrorism. German Law Journal, 5(5), 585-602.

Fidanci, S. (2006). Definition of terrorism in international law. The Journal of Turkish Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.turkishweekly.net/article/103/definition-ofterrorism-in-international-law.html

Foerster, V. H., Mora, M. P., & Amiot, W. L. (1960, November). Doomsday: Friday, 13

November, AD 2026. Science New Series, 132(3436), 1291-1295. Retrieved from http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bn/reading_group/vonFoerster_et_al.pdf

Ganor, B. (2002). Defining terrorism: Is one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter? Police Practice and Research, 3(4), 287-304.

Golder, B., & Williams, G. (2004). What is terrorism? Problems of legal definition. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 27(2), 270-295.

Halberstam, M. (2003). The evolution of the United Nations position on terrorism: From exempting national liberation movements to criminalizing terrorism wherever and by whomever committed. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 41, 573-582.

Hassan, O. A. (2011). International terrorism and the legal and political manifestations. Egypt: Aldar Legal Books Press. http://jis.uum.edu.my Mohammed Salman Mahmood & Ahmad Masum

Hickman, J. D. (2011). Terrorism as a violation of the law of nations: Finally overcoming the definitional problem. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 29(3), 447-483.

Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism 28. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. London: University of California Press.

Levitt, G. (1986). Is terrorism worth defining? Ohio Northern University Law Review, 13, 97-115.

Marston, G. (2002). Early attempts to suppress terrorism: The terrorism and international criminal court conventions of 1937. British Yearbook of International Law, 73(10), 293-313.

Rostow, N. (2002). Before and after: The changed UN response to terrorism since September 11th. Cornell International Law Journal, 35, 475-489.

Saul, B. (2005). Attempts to define terrorism in international law. Netherlands International Law Review, 52(1), 57-83.

Saul, B. (2006). Defining terrorism in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schmid, A. (2004a). Terrorism: The definitional problem. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 36(375), 375-419.

Schmid, A. (2004b). Framework for conceptualizing terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16(2), 197-221.

Schmid, A. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of terrorism research. London: Routledge.

Schmid, A. (2012). The revised academic consensus definition of terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 6(2), 158-159. Retrieved from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/ articles/issues/PTv6i2.pdf

Schmid, A., & Jongman, A. (1988). Political terrorism. A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, databases, theories and literature. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

Sunga, L. (1997). The emerging system of international criminal law: Developments in codification and implementation. The Hague: Kluwer International Law.

Walter, C., Voneky, S., Roben, V., & Schorkopf, F. (Eds.). (2004). Terrorism as a challenge for national and international law: Security versus liberty. Berlin: Springer. http://jis.uum.edu.my

Young, R. (2006). Defining terrorism: The evolution of terrorism as a legal concept in international law and its influence on definitions in domestic legislation. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 29, 23-1050.

Downloads

Published

16-12-2014

Issue

Vol. 10 (2014): Journal of International Studies (JIS) Vol. 10, 2014

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mahmood, M. S. (2014). A Quest for Defining Terrorism in International Law: The Emerging Consensus. Journal of International Studies, 10, 77-93. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2014.10.5