The United States: Still a Global Hegemonic Power?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2012.8.2Keywords:
United States, super power, neo-Gramscian, hegemony, declinists, primacistAbstract
References
Bello, W., & Kinley, D. (1983). The IMF: An analysis of the International Monetary Fund’s role in the third world debt crisis, its relation to big banks, and the forces influencing its decisions. Multinational Monitor 4.
Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2002). American primacy in perspective. Foreign Affairs, 81, 4.
Cafruny, A. (2008). The ‘Imperial Turn’ and the future of US hegemony: ‘Terminal Decline’ or retrenchment? Paper presented at the ISA’s 49th anunual convention, San Francisco. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/
Calleo, D. P., & Joffe J. (1987). Beyond American hegemony: The future of the Western Alliance; The limited partnership: Europe, the U.S., and the burdens of alliance. New York: Basic Books.
Cameron, F. (2003). US foreign policy after the Cold War: Global hegemony or reluctant sheriff. New York: Routledge.
Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10, 2.
Eric Louw, P. (2010). Roots of pax Americana: Decolononization, development and trade. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Gamble, A. (2009). The spectre at the feast: Capitalist crisis and the politics of recession. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goldstein, J. S. (2005). International Relations. New York: Pearson-Longman.
Grunberg, I. (1990). Exploring the myth of hegemonic stability. International Organization 44, 4.
Held, D. et al. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1989). The U.S. decline or renewal? Foreign Affairs, 67, 1. http://jis.uum.edu.my
Ikenberry, G. J. (Winter 1998/99). Institutions, strategic restraint, and the persistence of postwar order. International Security, 23, 3.
Iseri, E. (2007). Neo-Gramscian analysis of US hegemony today. In-Spire: Journal of Politics. International relations and the Environment, 2, 1.
Kahler, M. (1990). The U.S. and the International Monetary Fund. In Karns, M. P. & Mingst, K. A. (Eds.). The U.S. and Multilateral Institutions. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Kenedy, P. (2002, February 2). The eagle has landed. Financial Times.
Kindleberger, C. (1973). The world in depression: 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Layne, C. (1993). The unipolar illusion: Why new great powers will rise. International Security, 17, 4.
Layne, C. (2006). Impotent power? Re-examining the nature of America’s hegemonic power. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/
Layne, C. (2006). The unipolar illusion revisited the coming end of the U.S. Unipolar Moment. International Security, 31, 2.
Leffler, M. P. (1992). A preponderance of power: National security, the truman administration, and the cold war. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mastanduno, M. (1997). Preserving the unipolar moment: Realist theories and U.S. grand strategy. International Security, 21, 4.
Milner, H. (1998). International political economy: Beyond hegemonic stability. Foreign Policy, No. 110.
Momani, B. (2004). American politicization of the International Monetary Fund. Review of International Political Economy, 11, 5. Hang Nguyen Thi Thuy Neo-Gramscian. Retrieved from http://libguides.usc.edu/
Nye, J. (2002). The paradox of American power: Why the world’s only superpower can’t go it alone. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nye, J. (2009). Smart power. New Perspectives Quarterly, 26, 2.
Nye, J. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic http://jis.uum.edu.my Books.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs, U.S.
Paupp, T. E. (2009). The future of global relations: Crumbling walls, rising regions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Porter, T. (2005). The US in international trade policy: Liberal leader or heavy-handed hegemon? In Kelly, D. & Grant, W. (Eds.), The politics of international trade in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave.
Shipley, T. (2007). Currency wars: Oil, Iraq, and the future of US hegemony. Studies in Political Economy, 79.
Snyder, G. (1997). Alliance politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41, 4.
Thacker, S. C. (1999). The high politics of IMF lending. World Politics, 52, 1. The U.S. Declaration of Independence adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776.
Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wade, R. (2002). US hegemony and the world bank: The fight over people and ideas. Review of International Political Economy, 9, 2.
Walt, S. M. (2005). Taming American power: The global response to U.S. Primacy. New York: W. W. Norton.
Waltz, K. (1994). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18, 2.
Wang Jisi. (2003). The logic of the American hegemony. The Study Times (xuexi shibao). Retrieved from http://www.uscc.gov/researchpapers/translated_articles/ 2005/05_03_23_logic_of_the_american_hegemony.htm
Wohlforth, W. C. (1999). The stability of a unipolar world. International Security, 24, 1. World GDP by Country Patterns & Trends 2000–2009. Retrieved from http://proximityone. com/worldgdp.htm http://jis.uum.edu.my
Yilmaz, S. (2010). State, power, and hegemony. Strategic Research Center (BUSRC) Beykent University, Turkey. Retrieved from www.ijbssnet.com/journals/ Vol._1_ No._3_December_2010/20.pdf
Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American world. New York: W. W. Norton &. Company. http://jis.uum.edu.my
