Performance Comparison of PID Tuning by Using Ziegler-Nichols and Particle Swarm Optimization Approaches in a Water Control System

Authors

  • Zahratul Laily Edaris Polytechnic Sultan Abdul Halim Muadzam Shah, Malaysia
  • Syariza Abdul-Rahman Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2016.15.1.10

Keywords:

Particle Swarm Optimization, PID Controller, Ziegler-Nichols, single tank water level

Abstract

Tuning the gain of Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller in a process control system is exceptionally paramount since correct tuning would help a control process response without steady state error and overshoot. As the conventional gain tuning of PID controller, the Ziegler-Nichols (ZN) approach generally delivers an enormous overshoot; therefore, current heuristics approach, namely Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is utilized. A tuning problem of a single tank water level dynamic control system is presented. The best PID controller parameters are determined by using the ZN and PSO approaches. Comparisons of process time performance and the performance measurement of the system are made in order to evaluate both approaches in terms of their step response through the MATLAB/Simulink platform. The results demonstrate that the PSO approach produces promising results with lower overshoot compared to the ZN approach. It is found that the PSO approach would be advantageous for the industries related to single tank water control system for a better PID gain tuning.

 

References

Alobaedy, M. M., & Ku-Mahamud, K. R. (2015). Strategic oscillation for exploitation and exploration of acs algorithm for job scheduling in static grid computing. In the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management.

Asifa, H. M., & Vaishnav, S. R. (2010). particle swarm optimisation algorithm based PID Controller. In the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology http://jict.uum.edu.my (ICETET), pages 628–631.

Das S., Chakraborty A., Ray J. K., Bhattacharjee S., & Neogi B. (2012, August). Study on different tuning approach with incorporation of simulation aspect for Z-N (Ziegler-Nichols) Rules. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 3(8).

Ebrahim M.A., El-Metwally K.A., Bendary F. M., & Mansour W.M. (2012). Optimization of proportional-integral-differential controller for wind power plant using particle swarm optimization technique. International Journal of Electrical and Power Engineering, 6, 32-37.

Edaris, Z. L., & Abdul-Rahman, S. (2014). Optimizing proportional integral derivative water control system tuning based on particle swarm optimization. In the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Analysis & Mathematical Applications in Engineering (AMEAS2014), Curtin University Malaysia, January 19-22, pp. 265-271.

Goldberg, D.E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

Ibrahim, A. O., Shamsuddin, S. M., & Qasem, S. N. (2015). Hybrid NSGA-II optimization for improving the three-term BP network for multiclass classification problems. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 14(1), 21-38.

Kennedy J., & Eberhart R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICNN’95), 4, 1942-1948.

Korkmaz, M., Aydogdu, O., & Dogan, H. (2012). Design and performance comparison of variable parameter nonlinear PID controller and genetic Journal of ICT, 15, No. 1 (June) 2016, pp: 203– algorithm based PID controller. In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), 1-5.

Kim, J. S., Kim, J. H., Park, J. M., Park, S. M., Choe, W. Y., & Heo, H. (2008). Auto tuning PID controller based on improved genetic algorithm for reverse osmosis plant. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 47, 384-389. http://jict.uum.edu.my

Malhotra, R., Singh, N., & Singh, Y. (2010). Design of embedded hybrid fuzzy-GA control strategy for speed control of DC motor: A servo control case study. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975–8887), 6(5), 37-46.

Mehta B., & Reddy Y. (2015). Industrial process automation systems, Chapter 19. Advanced process control systems, (pp. 547-557).

Ogata K., (1987). Modern control systems. University of Minnesota: Prentice Hall.

Pan, H., Wang, L., & Liu, B. (2006). Particle swarm optimization for function optimization in noisy environment. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 908–919.

Pillay N., & Govender P. (2007). A particle swarm optimization approach for model independent tuning of PID control loop. IEEE Africon, IEEE Catalog: 04CH37590C, ISBN: 0-7803-8606-X.

Rahmat M. F., & Ghazaly M. M. (2006). Performance comparison between PID and fuzzy logic controller in position control system of DC Servomotor. Jurnal Teknologi 45(D), 1-17.

Saini, S., & Rani, S. (2012). Temperature control using intelligent techniques. In the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (ACCT), pages 138-145.

Solihin M. I., Tack L. F., & Kean M. L. (2011). Tuning of PID Controller Using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 2011, ISBN 978-983-42366-4-9, 458-461. Journal of ICT, 15, No. 1 (June) 2016, pp: 203–

Tandan, N., & Swarnkar, K. K. (2015). Tuning of PID Controller using Modified Particle Swarm Optimization, International Journal of Electronics, Electrical and Computational System, 4, 62-66.

Tunyasrirut S., & Wangnipparnto S. (2007). Level control in horizontal tank by fuzzy-PID cascade controller. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pp.78-82. http://jict.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

25-05-2016

How to Cite

Edaris, Z. L., & Abdul-Rahman, S. (2016). Performance Comparison of PID Tuning by Using Ziegler-Nichols and Particle Swarm Optimization Approaches in a Water Control System. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 15(1), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2016.15.1.10

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-06
11 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2016.15.1.10 OpenAlex W2698567378

Most read articles by the same author(s)