Object-Based Knowledge Representation of Female Related Issues from the Holy Quran

Authors

  • Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Aniza Mohamed Din School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Noraziah Che Pa School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Faudziah Ahmad School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Wan Hussain Wan Ishak School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Farzana Kabir Ahmad School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Roshidi Din School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2014.13.8

Keywords:

Knowledge Representation, Semantic Network, Conceptual Graph, Quran Female Term, Female Issues

Abstract

Focusing on the use of Semantic Network and Conceptual Graph (CG) representations, this paper presents an easy way in understanding concepts discussed in the Holy Quran. Quran is known as the main source of knowledge and has been a major source reference for all types of problems. However understanding the issues and the solution from the Quran is diffi cult due to lack of understanding of Quran literature. Meticulously, the Quran contains much important information related to female. However, this information are scattered and complexly linked. Technically, to extract and present the encapsulated knowledge on female matters in the Quran is a challenging task. Thus, this paper discusses on how to understand and represent the knowledge in an easy way. A total of 18 female terms are identifi ed. Through the terms, the name of surah, verses number and text from the verses are gathered. The texts are then analyzed and clustered into specifi c issues. Result of the analysis that consists of extracted knowledge on female issues is presented in a systematic structure using Semantic Network and CG. The strength and advantages of both approaches are compared, discussed and presented.

 

References

Abdullah, R., Selamat, M. N., Ibrahim, H., Ungku Chulan, U. C., Nasharuddin, N. A., & Abdul Hamid, J. (2009). Semantics representation in a sentence with concept relational model (CRM). Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 8, 55–65.

Aisha, F. (2013). Rights of women in Islam (In the light of Holy Quran and Hadiths). Samajbodh, 3(1), 33−42.

Al-Kharrat, A. M. (2007). Eraab Mushkil al-Quran (‫)ﻥﺁﺭﻕﻝﺍ ﻝﻙﺵﻡ ﺏﺍﺭﻉﺇ‬ Syntactic analysis of the Quran. Also available online at http://www. qurancomplex.com

Al-Qahtani, D. (2005). Semantic valence of Arabic verbs. Beirut: Librairie du Liban Publishers.

Amiri, H., AleAhmad, A., Rahgozar, M., & Oroumchian, F. (2008). Keyword suggestion using conceptual graph construction from Wikipedia rich documents. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering.

Atwell, E. S., Brierley, C., Dukes, K., Sawalha, M., & Sharaf, A. (2011). An artificial intelligence approach to Arabic and Islamic content on the Internet. Proceedings of the 3rd National Information Technology Symposium.

Badawi, J. (1980). The status of women in Islam: Basic principles. Retrieved from http://islamicweb.com

Chein, M., Mugnier, M. L., & Croitoru, M. (2013). Visual reasoning with graph-based mechanisms: The good, the better and the best. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 28(3), 249–271.

Gomaa, A. (2013). The Islamic view on female circumcision. African Journal of Urology, 19, 123–126. Journal of ICT, 13, 2014, pp: 145–

Hartley, R. & Barnden, J. (1997). Semantic networks: Visualizations of knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 169–175.

Jawad, H. A. (1998). The rights of women in Islam: An authentic approach. Great Britain: MacMillan Press.

Kamsu-Foguem, B., Diallo, G., & Foguem, C. (2013). Conceptual graph-based knowledge representation for supporting reasoning in African http://jict.uum.edu.my/ traditional medicine. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(4), 1348−1365.

Kelsey, R. L., Hartley, R. T., & Webster, R. B. (1997). An object-based methodology for knowledge representation in SGML. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 304−311.

Kent, R. E. (2000). Conceptual knowledge markup language: An introduction. Netnomics, 2, 139−169.

Koopman, B., Zuccon, G., Bruza, P., Sitbon, L., & Lawley, M. (2012). Graph-based concept weighting for medical information. Proceedings of the Australasian Document Computing Symposium, 80−87.

Kutscher, J. (2011). Towards a solution concerning female genital mutilation: An approach from within according to Islamic legal opinions. Religion and the Body, 23, 216−236.

Luger, G. F. (2009). Artificial intelligence: Structures and strategies for complex problem solving. Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley.

Martin, P. H. (2002). Knowledge representation in CGLF, CGIF, KIF, Frame-CG and Formalized-English. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, 77−91.

McDermott, D. (1976). Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 57, 4−9.

Moise, G., & Ionita, L. (2008). Educational semantic networks and their applications. Matematica-Informatica, LX (2), 77−85.

Nadeem-Yasin, M. Hikmat, U. K., Saeed, M. I., & Khiyal, M. S. H. (2009). Relational wordnet model for semantic search in Holy Quran. Proceedings of Emerging Technologies, 29–34.

Nanba, H., & Morishita, S. (2008). Searching for illustrative sentences for multiword expressions in a research paper database. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5362 Springer 2008, 114−123.

Naseem, S., Rahman, A., & Sawar, M. J. (2012). Semantic network based classifier of Holy Quran. International Journal of Computer Applications, 39(5), 43−47.

Puder, A. (1998). Mapping of CGIF to operational interfaces. Proceedings of International Conference on Conceptual Structures, 119-126. Journal of ICT, 13, 2014, pp: 145–

Rachidi, T., Bouzoubaa, M., El-Mortaji, L., Boussouab, B., & Bensaid, A. (2003). Arabic user search query correction and expansion. Proceedings of Competences Conference of Information Technology.

Rampoldi, M. (2014). Female sovereigns in Islamic states. Berlin: Epubli GmbH.

Raza, S. A., Rehan, M., Farooq, A., Ahsan, S. M., & Khan, M. S. (2014). http://jict.uum.edu.my/ An essential framework for concept based evolutionary Quranic search engine. Science International (Lahore), 26(1), 181−184.

Salih, Bahjat Al-wahhab (2007). Al-eraab al-Mufassal Li-Kitab Allah al-Murattal[ ‫] ﻝﺯﻥﻡﻝﺍ ﻩﻝﻝﺍ ﺏﺍﺕﻙﻝ ﻝﺹﻑﻡﻝﺍ ﺏﺍﺭﻉﺇﻝﺍ‬. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr.

Sharareh, S. S. (2012). Transinterpretation of Quranic words based on semantic network theory and devising their database. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Arts and Humanities, 405-414.

Sowa, J. F. (2008). Conceptual graphs. In F. van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz, & B. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of knowledge representation pp. 213-237. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Sowa, J. F. (2013). From existential graphs to conceptual graphs. International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications, 1(1), 39−72.

Surah.My. (n.d.). Terjemahan al-Quran bahasa Melayu. Retrieved from http://www.surah.my

Tanzil. (2011). Tanzil Project. Retrieved from http://tanzil.net.

Woods, W. A. (1975). What’s in a link: Foundations for Semantic Networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press.

Wrzeciono, P. (2013). Automatic indexing and creating semantic networks for agricultural science papers in the Polish language. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops, 356−360.

Zhang, L., Yan, L., & Ma, Z. M. (2013). A conceptual graph based approach for mappings among multiple fuzzyontologies. Journal of Web Engineering Archive, 12(3−4), 215−231.

Downloads

Published

19-02-2014

How to Cite

Ku-Mahamud, K. R., Mohamed Din, A., Che Pa, N., Ahmad, F., Wan Ishak, W. H., Kabir Ahmad, F., & Din, R. (2014). Object-Based Knowledge Representation of Female Related Issues from the Holy Quran. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 13, 145-161. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2014.13.8

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-06
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2014.13.8

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2