Chaos Search in Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test

Authors

  • Masato Koda University of Tsukuba 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba Science City 1-1-2 305-8577, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2012.11.1

Keywords:

Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST), global sensitivity analysis, chaos search, artificial intelligence (AI)

Abstract

Work in Artificial Intelligence (AI) often involves search algorithms. In many complicated problems, however, local search algorithms may fail to converge into global optimization and global search procedures are needed. In this paper, we investigate the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) as an example of a global sensitivity analysis tool for complex, non-linear dynamical systems. FAST was originally developed based on the Fourier series expansion of a model output and on the assumption that samples of model inputs are uniformly distributed in a high dimensional parameter space. In order to compute sensitivity indices, the parameter space needs to be searched utilizing an appropriate (space-filling) search curve. In FAST, search curves are defined through learning functions, selection of which will heavily affect the global searching capacity and computational efficiency. This paper explores the characterization of learning functions involved in FAST and derives the underlying dynamical relationships with chaos search, which can provide new learning algorithms. This contribution has proven the general link that exists between chaos search and FAST, which helps us exploit the ergodicity of chaos search in AI applications.

 

References

Cukier, R. I., Fortuin, C. M., Schuler, K. E., Petschek, A. G., & Schaibly, J.

H. (1973). A study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. Journal of Chemistry Phys, 59, 3873.

Schaibly, J. H., & Schuler, K. E. (1973). Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. Part II. Applications. Journal of Chemistry Phys, 59, 3879.

Cukier, R. I., Schaibly, J. H., & Schuler, K. E. (1975). Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. III. Analysis of the approximations. Journal of Chemistry. Phys, 63, 1140.

Cukier, R. I., Levine, R. B., & Schuler, K. E. (1978). Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems. Journal Computer Phys, 26, 1.

Hall, P., & Wolff, R. C. (1998). Properties of distributions and correlation integrals for generalised versions of the logistic map. Stoch Proc Appl. 77, 123.

M. Koda, G. J. McRae, & Seinfeld, J. H. (1979). Automatic, sensitivity analysis of reaction mechanism. International Journal Chem Kinet, 11, 427.

Koda, M., Dogru, A. H., & Seinfeld, J. H. (1979). Sensitivity analysis of partial differential equations with application to reaction and diffusion process. Journal Computer Phys, 30, 259. Journal of ICT, 11, pp: 1–

May, R. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459.

Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., & K. Chan. (1999). A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics, 4, (1), 39.

Collins, D. C., & Avissar, R. (1994). An evaluation with the Fourier Sensitivity Test (FAST) of which land-surface parameters are of greatest importance in atmospheric modeling. Journal Climate, 7, 681.

Fang, S., Gertner, G. Z., Shinkareva, S., Wang, G. & Anderson, A. (2003). Improved generalized fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) for model assessment. Statistic Computer, 13.

Yang, D. Li, G. & Cheng, G. (2007). On the efficiency of chaos optimization algorithms for global optimization. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 34, 1366. Saltelli, A. Ratto, M. Andres, T. Campolongo, F. Cariboni, J. Gatelli, D.

Saisana M. & Tarantola, S. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis. The Primer, Wiley.

Weyl, H., & Am, H. (1938). Mean motion, Amp. Journal Mathematics, 60, 889.

Lu, Y. & Mohanty, S. (2001). Sensitivity analysis of a complex, proposed geologic waste disposal system using the fourier amplitude sensitivity test. Reliable Engineering System Safety, 72, 275.

Hall, P., & Wolff, R. C. (1998). Properties of distributions and correlation integrals for generalised versions of the logistic map. Stoch Proc Appl. 77, 123.

Xu, C., & Gertner, G. (2011). Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the fourier amplitudes sensitivity test (FAST). Computer Statistics Data Analysis, 55, 184.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2012

How to Cite

Koda, M. (2012). Chaos Search in Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 11, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2012.11.1

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-06
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2012.11.1