A Cross-Dataset Adaptive Hybrid Ensemble Framework for Robust Inertial Fall Detection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2026.25.4.5Keywords:
Ensemble learning, fall detection, feature engineering, hybrid model, stacking classifierAbstract
Falls remain a major healthcare concern, particularly among older adults, since they frequently result in serious injuries, prolonged rehabilitation, and reduced quality of life. Although numerous inertial sensor-based fall detection methods have been reported, many are validated on a single dataset, limiting their ability to generalise across diverse sensing environments in real-world applications. This study proposes a cross-dataset Adaptive Hybrid Ensemble Framework (AHEF) for robust wearable fall detection. The framework combines heterogeneous Machine Learning (ML) classifiers Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Extra Trees (ET), and Elastic Net Logistic Regression (ENet-LR) within a probability-calibrated stacking architecture, followed by adaptive decision refinement using activity-aware thresholds and temporal confirmation. Performance was evaluated using three publicly available benchmark datasets (SisFall, MobiFall & KFall) under both subject-independent cross-validation and Leave-One-Dataset-Out (LODO) protocols. Experimental results indicate that the proposed framework achieved 98.7% accuracy, 99.1% sensitivity, and 98.3% specificity during within-dataset evaluation while maintaining strong cross-dataset performance, with average sensitivity exceeding 98% across unseen datasets. The framework also reduced the False Positive Rate (FPR) to 1.7%, compared with 4.0–6.4% obtained by the individual base classifiers, without compromising detection sensitivity. Overall, these findings demonstrate that combining cross-dataset evaluation with adaptive ensemble learning improves both prediction reliability and generalisation, supporting deployment of wearable fall detection systems in heterogeneous real-world environments.
References
Bhanusree, Y., Kumar, S. S., & Rao, A. K. (2023). Time-distributed attention-layered convolution neural network with ensemble learning using random forest classifier for speech emotion recognition. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 22(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2023.22.1.3
BIng2325. (2023, July 12). SisFall dataset [Data set]. GitHub. https://github.com/BIng2325/SisFall/releases
BMI-HMU. (2026). The MobiFall and MobiAct datasets. Biomedical Informatics & eHealth Laboratory, Hellenic Mediterranean University. https://bmi.hmu.gr/the-mobifall-and-mobiact-datasets-2/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026a, February 26). Older adult falls data. https://www.cdc.gov/falls/data-research/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026b, January 27). Facts about falls. https://www.cdc.gov/falls/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
Gießler, M., Werth, J., Waltersberger, B., & Karamanidis, K. (2024). A framework to automatically detect near-falls using a wearable inertial measurement cluster. Communications Engineering, 3, Article 181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-024-00325-x
Hong, Z., Li, Z., Zhong, S., Lyu, W., Wang, H., Ding, Y., He, T., & Zhang, D. (2024). CrossHAR: Generalizing cross-dataset human activity recognition via hierarchical self-supervised pretraining. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 8(2), Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3659597
Kasim, S., & Sheppard, J. W. (2023, June). Cross-domain similarity in domain adaptation for human activity recognition. In 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN54540.2023.10191305
Li, Y., Liu, P., Fang, Y., Wu, X., Xie, Y., Xu, Z., Ren, H., & Jing, F. (2025). A decade of progress in wearable sensors for fall detection (2015–2024): A network-based visualization review. Sensors, 25(7), 2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072205
Palli, A. S., Jaafar, J., Gilal, A. R., Alsughayyir, A., Gomes, H. M., Alshanqiti, A., & Omar, M. (2024). Online machine learning from non-stationary data streams in the presence of concept drift and class imbalance: A systematic review. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 23(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2024.23.1.5
Pavlovic, M. (2025). Understanding model calibration: A gentle introduction and visual exploration of the calibration and the expected calibration error (ECE) [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.19047
Priya, S., & Amshakala, K. (2025). An adaptive fall detection system based on ensemble learning using variants of YOLOv8, RetinaNet and DETR. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 33161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97634-8
Qin, X., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Lu, W., & Jiang, X. (2023). Domain generalization for activity recognition via adaptive feature fusion. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 14(1), 9:1–9:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3552434
Rafrastara, F. A., Ghozi, W., Sani, R. R., Handoko, L. B., Abdussalam, A., Pramudya, E. R., & Abdollah, F. M. (2025). Integrating information gain and chi-square for enhanced malware detection performance. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.1.4
Sainin, M. S., Alfred, R., & Ahmad, F. (2021). Ensemble meta classifier with sampling and feature selection for data with imbalance multiclass problem. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 20(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2021.20.2.1
Scikit-learn developers. (2026). Probability calibration [User guide]. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/calibration.html
Silva Filho, T. M., Song, H., Perello-Nieto, M., Santos-Rodriguez, R., Kull, M., & Flach, P. (2023). Classifier calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilities. Machine Learning, 112, 3211–3260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06336-7
Silva, C. A., Casilari, E., & García-Bermúdez, R. (2024). Cross-dataset evaluation of wearable fall detection systems using data from real falls and long-term monitoring of daily life. Measurement, 235, 114992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114992
Su, C., Wei, J., Lin, D., Kong, L., & Guan, Y. (2024). A novel model for fall detection and action recognition combined lightweight 3D-CNN and convolutional LSTM networks. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 27(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-024-01224-9
Subramaniam, S. S., Faisal, A. A. I., & Deen, M. J. (2022). Wearable sensor systems for fall risk assessment: A review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 921506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.921506
Sucerquia, A., López, J. D., & Vargas-Bonilla, J. F. (2017). SisFall: A fall and movement dataset. Sensors, 17(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010198
Vavoulas, G., Pediaditis, M., Spanakis, E. G., & Tsiknakis, M. (2013). The MobiFall dataset: An initial evaluation of fall detection algorithms using smartphones. In 2013 13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering (BIBE) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2013.6701629
Wan Azman, W. N. F. S., Ku Azir, K. N. F., & Mohd Khairuddin, A. (2024). An embedded machine learning-based spoiled leftover food detection device for multiclass classification. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 23(2), 253–292. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2024.23.2.4
Yu, X., Jang, J., & Xiong, S. (2021). A large-scale open motion dataset (KFall) and benchmark algorithms for detecting pre-impact fall of the elderly using wearable inertial sensors. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, Article 692865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.692865
Yusof, Y., & Fajila, F. (2026). Conditional tabular generative adversarial network-based synthetic data generation for model generalisation improvement. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2026.25.1.1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information and Communication Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-11-02Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
2002 - 2020






















