Motion-Pattern-Based Multi-Object Tracking for Real-Time Edge Computing Deployment

Authors

  • Dona Yuliawati Department of Information System, Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Indonesia
  • Sushanty Saleh Department of Information System, Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Indonesia
  • Suhendro Yusuf Irianto Department of Informatics, Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Indonesia
  • Anggi Andriyadi Department of Information System, Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2026.25.2.5

Keywords:

Computer vision, embedded systems, energy efficiency, object tracking, real-time processing

Abstract

Real-time object tracking in embedded systems requires algorithms that balance processing performance with energy efficiency for practical deployment. This study evaluates the performance of the TG-Lite algorithm on Jetson Nano embedded hardware for surveillance applications requiring a minimum processing rate of 10 frames per second (FPS). The methodology involves comprehensive performance analysis, measuring frame-processing rates, energy consumption patterns, and system resource utilisation across video-file and live-stream scenarios. TG-Lite achieves 15.51 FPS processing capability with 11.24 watts (W) power consumption, meeting real-time processing requirements for embedded surveillance deployment. The algorithm demonstrates consistent performance across different input conditions, maintaining stable processing rates on both video files (10.86 FPS) and live streams (15.51 FPS). TG-Lite exhibits efficient resource utilisation, with moderate central processing unit (CPU) usage (17.4% average) and effective graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration. The energy analysis reveals TG-Lite's 1.38 frames-per-watt efficiency, indicating effective allocation of computational resources for real-time processing demands. Performance evaluation shows that TG-Lite maintains stable tracking continuity, with an average track length of 35.8 frames and a consistent confidence distribution pattern. These results demonstrate the suitability of the proposed approach for embedded computer vision applications under the evaluated edge constraints.

References

Aharon, N., Orfaig, R., & Bobrovsky, B.-Z. (2022). BoT-SORT: Robust associations multi-pedestrian tracking. http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14651

An, Y., Wu, J., Cui, Y., & Hu, H. (2023). Multi-object tracking based on a novel feature image with multi-modal information. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 72(8), 9909–9921. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2023.3259999

Ansari, M. A., & Singh, D. K. (2022). ESAR, an expert shoplifting activity recognition system. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 22(1), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2022-0012

Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F., & Upcroft, B. (2016). Simple online and realtime tracking. Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP, 2016-August, 3464–3468. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533003

Cao, J., Pang, J., Weng, X., Khirodkar, R., & Kitani, K. (2023). Observation-centric SORT: Rethinking SORT for robust multi-object tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023-June, 9686–9696. https://doi.org/10.1109/ CVPR52729.2023.00934

Du et al. (2023a). StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Again. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25, 8725–8737. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2023.3240881

Ganesh, S. V., Wu, Y., Liu, G., Kompella, R., & Liu, L. (2023). Fast and resource-efficient object tracking on edge devices: A measurement study. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.02666 Global Road Safety | Transportation Safety | CDC. (n.d.). https://www.cdc.gov/transportation-safety/global/index.html

Guan et al. (2025). Multi-object tracking review: Retrospective and emerging trend. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(8), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-025-11212-Y/TABLES/8

Khalil, M. M., Saleh, S. N., Tawfik, N. S., & Elagamy, M. N. (2025). EF-StrongSORT: An enhanced feature StrongSORT model for multi-object tracking. IEEE Access, 13, 53608–53620. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3554706

Li, X., Chen, C., Lou, Y., Abdallah, M., Kim, K. T., & Bagchi, S. (2024). HopTrack: A real-time multi-object tracking system for embedded devices. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00608v1

Murat, A. A., & Kiran, M. S. (2025). A comprehensive review on YOLO versions for object detection. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 70, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESTCH.2025.102161

Nasir, R., Jalil, Z., Nasir, M., Alsubait, T., Ashraf, M., & Saleem, S. (2025). An enhanced framework for real-time dense crowd abnormal behavior detection using YOLOv8. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(7), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-025-11206-W/TABLES/15

OECD Urban Studies. (2023). Smart city data governance. OECD Publishing, OECD Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1787/E57CE301-EN

Precedence Research (2026). Edge computing market size to hit USD 5,132.29 Bn by 2034. https://www.precedenceresearch.com/edge-computing-market

Quasim, M. T., Khan, M. A., Algarni, F., & Alshahrani, M. M. (2021). Fundamentals of smart cities. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure, Part F1386, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60922-1_1

Rasheed, A. F., & Zarkoosh, M. (2025). Optimized YOLOv8 for multi-scale object detection. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11554-024-01582-X/FIGURES/9

Sapkota et al. (2025). YOLO advances to its genesis: A decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(9), 1–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-025-11253-3/TABLES/8

Satyajit Sinha. (2023, September 24). Number of connected IoT devices growing 13% to 18.8 billion. IoT Analytics. https://iot-analytics.com/number-connected-iot-devices/

Tsai, C. Y., & Su, Y. K. (2022). MobileNet-JDE: A lightweight multi-object tracking model for embedded systems. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(7), 9915–9937. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11042-022-12095-9/FIGURES/12

Varghese, R., & Sambath, M. (2024). YOLOv8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robustness. 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems, ADICS 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ADICS58448. 2024.10533619

Wojke, N., Bewley, A., & Paulus, D. (2017). Simple online and realtime tracking with a deep association metric. Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP, 2017-September, 3645–3649. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296962

World Health Organization. (2023, December 13). Global status report on road safety 2023: Summary. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240086456 World Smart Cities Outlook 2024 | UN-Habitat. (n.d.). https://unhabitat.org/world-smart-cities-outlook-2024

Zhang et al. (2022). ByteTrack: Multi-object tracking by associating every detection box. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13682 LNCS, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20047-2_1

Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Wang, X., Zeng, W., & Liu, W. (2021). FairMOT: On the fairness of detection and re-identification in multiple object tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(11), 3069–3087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-021-01513-4

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Yuliawati, D., Saleh, S., Yusuf Irianto, S., & Andriyadi, A. (2026). Motion-Pattern-Based Multi-Object Tracking for Real-Time Edge Computing Deployment. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 25(2), 96-121. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2026.25.2.5

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-26
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2026.25.2.5 OpenAlex W7160997979 Scopus 105040250011