Expert Elicitation of Fuzzy Membership Functions of Linguistic Terms: A Fire Evacuation Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.4.6Keywords:
Decision-support systems, emergency information systems, expert decision-making, fuzzy linguistic, membership functionsAbstract
Decision-making in complex, uncertain environments, like emergency evacuations, often relies on the use of linguistic terms to express subjective judgments. However, the inherent ambiguity of these linguistic terms, coupled with the variability of expert opinions, poses a significant challenge for accurate decision-making. Membership functions (MFs) are essential tools for quantifying and representing the meaning of these linguistic terms, allowing for the computational processing of subjective judgments. Existing methods for eliciting MFs of these terms struggle to capture the inherent variability and probabilistic nature of expert opinions, hindering the accurate representation of uncertainty. Existing methods for eliciting membership functions (MFs) of these terms struggle to capture the inherent variability and probabilistic nature of expert opinions, hindering accurate representation of uncertainty. This study propose a framework for eliciting MFs of probabilistic linguistic terms using the Interval Estimation (IE) technique. The procedure integrates a graphic survey to construct MFs that fulfils the definition of Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN). This approach allows experts to directly express their uncertainty ranges, ensuring the resulting MFs reflect both their individual perceptions and the overall probabilistic distribution of opinions. A case study eliciting psychological responses in fire evacuation scenarios is utilized to demonstrate the utility of our proposed framework. The developed MFs were integrated into a Bayesian Network (BN) decision model. The performance analysis indicated by sensitivity values confirms the stability and robustness of the BN model parameters, thereby validating the rationality and meaningfulness of the expert-elicited MFs. The resulting MFs demonstrated a significant improvement in capturing the variability of psychological responses compared to traditional methods. This robust methodology provides a practical tool for developing expert-driven fuzzy linguistic scales tailored to specific domains thus offering practical applications for decision-making in uncertain environments.
References
Adesina, K. A., Yazdi, M., Omidvar, M. (2022). Emergency decision making fuzzy-expert aided disaster management system. In M. Yazdi (Eds.), Linguistic Methods Under Fuzzy Information in System Safety and Reliability Analysis (pp. 139-150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93352-4_6
Amin, S., Hijji, M., Iqbal, R., Harrop, W., & Chang, V. (2019). Fuzzy expert system-based framework for flood management in Saudi Arabia. Cluster Computing, 22(5), 11723-11740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1465-4
BayesFusion. (n.d.). GeNIe Academic Version 2.3. https://www.bayesfusion.com/genie/
Bocklisch, F., Bocklisch, S. F., Baumann, M. R. K., Scholz, A., & Krems, J. F. (2010). The role of vagueness in the numerical translation of verbal probabilities: A fuzzy approach. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32. https://escholarship.org/ uc/item/5xd0d6g6
Chameau, J. L., & Santamarina, J. C. (1987). Membership functions I: Comparing methods of measurement. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(87)80003-8
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 375. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
Chen, Z., Wu, D., & Luo, W. (2023). A hybrid emergency decision-making technique based on trapezoidal fuzzy best-worst method and zero-sum game. Expert Systems with Applications, 234, 120990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120990
Deng, Y., & Shi, W. K. (2003). A modified aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Cybernetics and Systems, 34(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969720302840
Ding, X. F., & Liu, H. C. (2019). A new approach for emergency decision‐making based on zero‐sum game with Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic variables. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(7), 1667-1684. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22113
Ding, X. F., Zhu, L. X., Lu, M. S., Wang, Q., & Feng, Y. Q. (2020a). A novel linguistic Z‐number QUALIFLEX method and its application to large group emergency decision making. Scientific Programming, 2020(1), 1631869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1631869
Ding, X., Zhang, L., & Liu, H. C. (2020b). Emergency decision making with extended axiomatic design approach under picture fuzzy environment. Expert Systems, 37(2), e12482. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12482
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. Academic Press.
Gao, X., Pan, L., Pelusi, D., & Deng, Y. (2023). Fuzzy Markov decision-making model for interference effects. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 31(1), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ. 2022.3184784
García-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2007). Solving a decision problem with linguistic information. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(16), 2284–2294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. patrec.2007.07.010
Guliyeva, P., & Ismibayli, R. (2023). Analysis of the methods for constructing membership functions using expert data. In 2023 5th International Conference on Problems of Cybernetics and Informatics (PCI) (pp. 1-3). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCI60110.2023.10325942
Hao, Z., Xu, Z., Zhao, H., & Fujita, H. (2018). A dynamic weight determination approach based on the intuitionistic fuzzy Bayesian network and its application to emergency decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017. 2755001
Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00024
Hsu, H. M., & Chen, C. T. (1996). Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(3), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00185-9
Jing, K., & Tang, L. (2014). Method for group decision making based on partial preferences in metro emergency evacuation. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology (pp. 260-263). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920379
Ju, Y., Wang, A., & Liu, X. (2012). Evaluating emergency response capacity by fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 6972-6981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.061
Klir, G. & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Prentice Hall.
Lang, K., Si, D., & Ma, Z. (2020). A novel method of emergency situation evaluation for deep-sea based on Bayesian network. IEEE Access, 8, 215863-215873. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ACCESS.2020.3039171
Li, H., Guo, J. Y., Yazdi, M., Nedjati, A., & Adesina, K. A. (2021). Supportive emergency decision-making model towards sustainable development with fuzzy expert system. Neural Computing & Application, 33, 15619–15637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06183-4
Liu, D., Cheng, Y., & Peng, D. (2024). The multiple interacting fuzzy linguistic set and its application in emergency decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 245, 123100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123100
Miliauskaitė, J., & Kalibatiene, D. (2020). On general framework of type-1 membership function construction: Case study in QoS planning. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(2), 504-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00753-4
Miller-Hooks, E., & Krauthammer, T. (2007). An intelligent evacuation, rescue, and recovery concept. Fire Technology, 43, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-006-8433-5
Mo, H. (2020). An emergency decision-making method for probabilistic linguistic term sets extended by D number theory. Symmetry, 12(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12030380
Mohd Sharif et al. (2019). A fuzzy rule-based expert system for asthma severity identification in emergency department. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 18(4), 415-438. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2019.18.4.2
Mosqueira-Rey, E., Moret-Bonillo, V., & Fernández-Leal, Á. (2008). An expert system to achieve fuzzy interpretations of validation data. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 2089-2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.045
O’Hagan, A. (2019). Expert knowledge elicitation: Subjective but scientific. The American Statistician, 73(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1518265
Pagola, M., López-Molina, C., Fernández, J., Tartas, E., & Bustince, H. (2013). Interval type-2 fuzzy sets constructed from several membership functions: Application to the fuzzy thresholding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21(2), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TFUZZ.2012.2209885
Pitchforth, J., & Mengersen, K. (2013). A proposed validation framework for expert elicited Bayesian networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(1), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa. 2012.07.026
Qiu, J., Gu, W., Kong, Q., Zhong, Q., & Hu, J. (2016). The emergency response management based on Bayesian decision network. In 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2016.7849973
Ramli, N., Ghani, N. A., Ahmad, N., & Hashim, I. H. M. (2021). Psychological response in fire: A fuzzy Bayesian network approach using expert judgment. Fire Technology, 57(5), 2305-2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01106-0
Ren, J., Jenkinson, I., Wang, J., Xu, D. L., & Yang, J. B. (2008). A methodology to model causal relationships on off-shore safety assessment focusing on human and organisational factors. Journal of Safety Research, 39(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.009
Ren, J., Jenkinson, I., Wang, J., Xu, D. L., & Yang, J. B. (2009). An off-shore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian network. Journal of Off-shore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 131(4), 041101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3124123
Ren, P., Xu, Z., & Hao, Z. (2017). Hesitant fuzzy thermodynamic method for emergency decision making based on prospect theory. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 47(10), 2531-2543. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2638498
Renooij, S., & Witteman, C. (1999). Talking probabilities: Communicating probabilistic information with words and numbers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 22(3), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-613X(99)00027-4
Rodríguez, R. M., Labella, Á. & Martínez, L. (2016). An overview on fuzzy modelling of complex linguistic preferences in decision making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2016.1180821
Rong, Y., Liu, Y., & Pei, Z. (2021). A novel multiple attribute decision-making approach for evaluation of emergency management schemes under picture fuzzy environment. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13(2), 633-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-021-01280-1
Ross, T. J. (2000). Membership functions, fuzzification and defuzzification. In P. S. Szczepaniak et al. (Eds.), Fuzzy systems in medicine, 41 (pp. 48-77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-790 8-1859-8_3
Ross, T. J. (2010). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119994374
Santacreu Ríos, L. J., Talavera-Ortiz, A., Aguasca-Colomo, R., & Galván-González, B. J. (2015). Expert sistem for making decisions about emergency and safety in case of adverse meteorological conditions. Dyna (Bilbao), 90(5), 503-512. https://doi.org/10.6036/7469
Shen, S., Gong, Z., Zhou, B., & Słowiński, R. (2025). Empathic network learning for multi-expert emergency decision-making under incomplete and inconsistent information. Information Fusion, 117, 102844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102844
Shushura, O. (2020). Construction of membership functions in fuzzy modeling tasks using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(3), 3922-3925. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/33932020
Silva, V. B., & Morais, D. C. (2014). A group decision-making approach using a method for constructing a linguistic scale. Information Sciences, 288, 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ins.2014.08.012
Su, W., Chen, L., & Gao, X. (2022). Emergency decision making: A literature review and future directions. Sustainability, 14(17), 10925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710925
Sun, B., Wei, W., & Zhao, H. (2015). An approach to emergency decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set over two universes. Soft Computing, 20(10), 3617-3628. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00500-015-1721-6
Sun, Y., Mi, J., Chen, J., & Liu, W. (2021). A new fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making method with generalised maximal consistent block and its application in emergency management. Knowledge-Based Systems, 215, 106594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106594
Tariq, M. T., Massahi, A., Saha, R., & Hadi, M. (2020). Combining machine learning and fuzzy rule-based system in automating signal timing experts’ decisions during non-recurrent congestion. Transportation Research Record, 2674(6), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120 918248
Turksen, I. B. (1991). Measurement of membership functions and their acquisition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(91)90045-R
Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., & Kemp, S. M. (1993). Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334162
Wang, L., Wang, Y. M., Rodríguez, R. M., & Martínez, L. (2017). A hesitant fuzzy linguistic model for emergency decision making based on fuzzy TODIM method. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2017.8015550.
Wu, H., Wang, J. W., Liu, S., & Yang, T. (2020). Research on decision-making of emergency plan for waterlogging disaster in subway station project based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and TOPSIS. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 17(5), 4825-4851. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020263
Xu, S., Hao, Z., Zhu, Y., Wang, Z., Xiao, Y., & Liu, B. (2023). Semi-supervised fuzzy clustering algorithm based on prior membership degree matrix with expert preference. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 121812. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4329688
Xue, B., Tao, G., & Zhang, L. (2021). Research on emergency decision making based on Bayesian Method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1827, 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1827/1/012049
Yan, S., Xu, Y., Gong, Z., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2025). Fuzzy quantum group decision making and its application in meteorological disaster emergency. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 33(1), 1441-1454. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3525009
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Information and Communication Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-05Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- OpenAlex 0 View →
- Semantic Scholar 0 View →
- OpenCitations 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Scopus 0 View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
2002 - 2020






















