A Convex Variational Interactive Model with Projection Method for Digital Images Partitioning

Authors

  • Abdul Kadir Jumaat Institute for Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (IBDAAI), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Mohamed Ammareza Mohamed Shariff School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Nuruljannah Khairunnizam School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.3.4

Keywords:

Convex formulation, image partitioning, interactive segmentation, projection method, variational interactive model

Abstract

Digital image partitioning separates the foreground of an image from the background for subsequent analysis. In literature, the variational global model is frequently employed for digital images partitioning; however, it has been shown to underperform when the targeted object is situated near a neighbouring object. To address this issue, researchers recently devised the variational interactive model (VIM). However, because of the formulation’s non-convexity, it is sensitive to the placement of the initial contour and provides inaccurate results if the initial contour is not positioned correctly. Consequently, a new convex formulation of VIM was recently developed based on the chessboard distance function, known as the Selective Segmentation based on Chessboard distance function (SSCD) model. Although this model achieved better accuracy and efficiency in image partitioning and is less sensitive to the initial contour’s location compared to the non-convex VIM, the partitioning process is significantly slower, especially for large-sized images. This stems from the utilisation of a complex penalty term and the approximation of the regularisation term during the energy minimisation phase, which also impacts the accuracy of the partitioning results. This work contributes by proposing a new convex VIM that omits the penalty term and avoids approximating the regularisation term. Moreover, the idea of utilising the projection method is proposed to speed up the partitioning process with improved accuracy. Numerical experiments demonstrated that the proposed model achieved higher accuracy and efficiency compared to existing models. The proposed model has the potential to be formulated into a three-dimensional formulation in the future.

References

Abdullah, S. A., & Jumaat, A. K. (2022). Selective image segmentation models using three distance functions. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 21(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2022.21.1.5

Azman, N. F., Jumaat, A. K., Badarul Azam, A. S., Mohd Ghani, N. A. S., Maasar, M. A., Laham, M. F., & Nek Abd Rahman, N. (2024). Digital medical images segmentation by active contour model based on the signed pressure force function. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 23(3), 393419. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2024.23.3.2

Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimisation. Cambridge University Press.

Chakraborty, T., Saini, V., Govila, D., & Singh, G. (2019). Four most life threatening urogenital cancer and its management. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 9(8), 3166–3174. https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(8).3166-

Chambolle, A. (2004). An algorithm for total variation regularization and denoising. Journal Math. Imaging, 20(1–2), 89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B: JMIV.0000011325.36760.1e

Chan, T., Golub, G., & Mulet, P. (1999). A nonlinear primal-dual method for total variation-based image restoration. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20(6), 1964–1977. https://doi.org/10.1137/ S1064827596299767

Chen, Q., Yang, X., & Petriu, E. M. (2004). Watershed segmentation for binary images with different distance transforms. In A. E. Saddik & R. Goubran (Eds.), The 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Their Applications (pp. 111–116). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ HAVE.2004.1391891

Cheng, J. (2017). Brain tumor dataset (Version 5). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare. 1512427.v5

Fang, J., Liu, H., Zhang, L., Liu, J., & Liu, H. (2019). Active contour driven by weighted hybrid signed pressure force for image segmentation. IEEE Access, 7, 97492–97504. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929659

Fang, J., Liu, H., Zhang, L., Liu, J., & Liu, H. (2021). Region-edge-based active contours driven by hybrid and local fuzzy region-based energy for image segmentation. Information Sciences, 546, 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.

Gu, J., Fang, Y., Gao, Y., & Tian, F. (2020). Segmentation of coronary arteries images using global feature embedded network with active contour loss. Computerised Medical Imaging and Graphics, 86, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101799

Ikbal, Y. M., & Serap, G. (2023). Recognition of Hereford and Simmental cattle breeds via computer vision. Iranian J. Appl. Animal Sci., 13(1), 21–32. https://journals.iau.ir/article_699902. html?lang=en

Jumaat, A. K., & Chen, K. (2019). A reformulated convex and selective variational image segmentation model and its fast multilevel algorithm. Numerical Mathematics, 12(2), 403–437. https://doi.org/10.4208/nmtma.OA-2017-0143

Lee, Y. H., & Horng, S. J. (1996). The chessboard distance transform and the medial axis transform are interchangeable. In M. E. Kavanaugh (Ed.), Proceeding of International Conference on Parallel Processing (pp. 424–428). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1996.508090

Li, B. N., Qin, J., Wang, R., Wang, M., & Li, X. (2016). Selective level set segmentationusing fuzzy region competition. IEEE Access, 4, 4777–4788. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016. 2590440

Liu, H. X., Fang, J. X., Zhang, Z. J., & Lin, Y. C. (2021). Localised edge-region-based active contour for medical image segmentation. IET Image Processing, 15(7), 1567–1582. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.12126

Moreira, I. C., Amaral, I., Domingues, I., Cardoso, A., Cardoso, M. J., & Cardoso, J. S. (2012). INbreast: Toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Academic Radiology, 19(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014

Rada, L., & Chen, K. (2012). A new variational model with dual level set functions for selective segmentation. Communications in Computational Physics, 12(1), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.190111.210611a

Rodtook, A., Kirimasthong, K., Lohitvisate, W., & Makhanov, S. S. (2018). Automatic initialisation of active contours and level set method in ultrasound images of breast abnormalities. Pattern Recognition, 79, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.032

Salvi, M., Acharya, U. R., Molinari, F., & Meiburger, K. M. (2021). The impact of pre- and post-image processing techniques on deep learning frameworks: A comprehensive review for digital pathology image analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 128, 104129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104129

Shewajo, F. A., & Fante, K. A. (2023). Tile-based microscopic image processing for malaria screening using a deep learning approach. BMC Medical Imaging, 23(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12880-023-00993-9

Sivachandiran, S. (2015). Image Segmentation. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1(2), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.17816/byusu201511299-101

Spencer, J., & Chen, K. (2015). A convex and selective variational model for image segmentation. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 13(6), 1453–1472. https://doi.org/10.4310/CMS. 2015.v13.n6.a5

Tan, Y. (2016). GPU-based Parallel Implementation of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-02468-6

Tyagi, L. (2017). Review of various image segmentation techniques. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 30(4), 440–443. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV 3IS040480

Yang, Y., Jia, W., & Wu, B. (2020). Simultaneous segmentation and correction model for color medical and natural images with intensity inhomogeneity. The Visual Comput., 36, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-019-01651-4

Yogamangalam, R., & Karthikeyan, B. (2016). Segmentation techniques comparison in image processing. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 307–313.

Zhao, W., Wang, W., Feng, X., & Han, Y. (2022). A new variational method for selective segmentation of medical image. Signal Processing, 190, 108292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2021. 108292

Zhi, X. H., & Shen, H. B. (2018). Saliency driven region-edge-based top down level set evolution reveals the asynchronous focus in image segmentation. Pattern Recognit., 80, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.010

Zhu, G. L., Lv, X. G., Li, F., & Sun, X. M. (2022). Nonconvex variational approach for simultaneously recovering cartoon and texture images. J. Electron. Imaging, 31(4), 043021. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.31.4.043021

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

How to Cite

Jumaat, A. K., Mohamed Shariff, M. A., & Khairunnizam, N. (2025). A Convex Variational Interactive Model with Projection Method for Digital Images Partitioning. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24(3), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.3.4

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-05
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2025.24.3.4 OpenAlex W4412814981 Scopus 105018183446

Most read articles by the same author(s)