Unlocking AI-Powered Tools Adoption among University Students: A Fuzzy-Set Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.1.1Keywords:
AI-powered tools, self-determination theory, technology acceptance model, fsQCA, Fuzzy-setAbstract
This study examines, from a post-pandemic theoretical perspective, university students' continuous intention (CI) to utilise AI-powered tools for educational purposes. AI-powered tools are new and underutilised in higher education. The fact that students and teachers need knowledge to use these apps in the classroom compounds the issue. Despite this technology's recent academic introduction, nothing is known about its impacts. In order to investigate the variables that influence the continual intention to employ artificial intelligence, this study discusses the possibility of integrating the self-determination theory (SDT) and technology acceptance model (TAM) with the post-acceptance model (PAM). Three hundred forty university students were solicited to complete a questionnaire to collect data for the proposed model. A dual-stage approach uses both symmetrical assumptions from structural equation modelling with partial least squares (PLS-SEM) and asymmetrical configurations from fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). In order to better comprehend the intricate interplay between the model's inputs and its desired output, this approach is devised. Consideration is given to the fact that various configurations of external constructs exert distinct influences on internal constructs. In Thailand, perceived usefulness (PU) and autonomy predict continued AI-powered tool use. Perceived ease of use (PEOU) did not affect continuing intention. Conclusions drawn from the configurational analysis show that no single factor adequately explains a high CI level. Rather, three distinct configurations were identified as improving CI using AI-powered tools. Overall, theoretical and practical ramifications are addressed.
References
Adams, C., & Khojasteh, J. (2018). Igniting students’ inner determination: the role of a need-supportive climate. Journal of Educational Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2017-0036
Akour, I., Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., Al Ali, A., & Salloum, S. (2021). Using machine learning algorithms to predict people’s intention to use mobile learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: Machine learning approach. JMIR Medical Education, 7(1), e24032. https://doi.org/10.2196/24032
Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., & Salloum, S. A. (2020). An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2899-2918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10094-
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Yusof, F. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2021). The influence of information system success and technology acceptance model on social media factors in education. Sustainability, 13(14), 7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147770
Alzaidi, M. S., & Shehawy, Y. M. (2022). Cross-national differences in mobile learning adoption during COVID-19. Education+ Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2021-0179
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-2909.103.3.411
Aw, E. C.-X., Tan, G. W.-H., Chuah, S. H.-W., Ooi, K.-B., & Hajli, N. (2022). Be my friend! Cultivating parasocial relationships with social media influencers: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 66-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0025
Becker, J.-M., Cheah, J.-H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2022-1281
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Chen, Y., Xu, J., Bryant, D. A., & Howard, A. (2023). Effects of Human and Robot Feedback on Shaping Human Movement Behaviors during Reaching Tasks. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021. 2020007
Chin, W., Cheah, J.-H., Liu, Y., Ting, H., Lim, X.-J., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2161-2209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2019-0529
Ch'ng, C. K. (2024). Hybrid Machine Learning Approach for predicting E-wallet Adoption among Higher Education Students in Malaysia. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 23(2), 177-210. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2024.23.2.
Cifci, I., Kahraman, O. C., Tiwari, S., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2023). Demystifying meal-sharing experiences through a combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2176083
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In (2nd ed. ed.): New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cortez, P. M., Ong, A. K. S., Diaz, J. F. T., German, J. D., & Jagdeep, S. J. S. S. (2024). Analysing Preceding factors affecting behavioral intention on communicational artificial intelligence as an educational tool. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25896
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00351-
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2023). The technology acceptance model 30 years of TAM. Technology, 1(1), 1-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-
Diop, E. B., Zhao, S., & Duy, T. V. (2019). An extension of the technology acceptance model for understanding travelers' adoption of variable message signs. PLoS one, 14(4), e0216007-e0216007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216007
Fan, P., & Jiang, Q. (2024). Exploring the Factors Influencing Continuance Intention to Use AI Drawing Tools: Insights from Designers. Systems, 12(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems1203068
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organisation research. Academy of management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011. 60263120
Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B. (2023). Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2255762
Garad, A., Budiyanto, G., & Ansi, A. (2021). Impact of covid-19 pandemic on the global economy and future prospects: A systematic review of global reports. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 99(4), 1-15. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/onehundred04.php
Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). This fast car can move faster: a review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00534-
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organisational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organisational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Hossain, M. N., Talukder, M. S., Khayer, A., & Bao, Y. (2021). Investigating the factors driving adult learners' continuous intention to use M-learning application: a fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 245-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2019-0071
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Van den Broeck, A., Guay, F., Chatzisarantis, N., Ntoumanis, N., & Pelletier, L. G. (2020). A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 534-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09815-
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3(4), 424. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
Imsa-ard, P. (2020). Thai university students’ perceptions towards the abrupt transition to ‘forced’online learning in the COVID-19 situation. วารสาร ศึกษา ศาสตร ์ มหาวิทยาลัย ขอนแก่น, 43(3), 30-44. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDKKUJ/article/view/242970
Jaboob, M., Hazaimeh, M., & Al-Ansi, A. M. (2024). Integration of Generative AI Techniques and Applications in Student Behavior and Cognitive Achievement in Arab Higher Education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10447318. 2024.1234567
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications for industry 4.0: A literature-based study. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 7(01), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862222500050
Jeno, L. M., Grytnes, J.-A., & Vandvik, V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students' motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education, 107, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016. 12.
Jurayev, T. N. (2023). The use of mobile learning applications in higher education institutes. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 610-620. https://doi.org/10.25082/ AMLER.2023.01.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ IJeC.2015100101
Lai, H.-J. (2020). Investigating older adults’ decisions to use mobile devices for learning, based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 890-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1546748
Larsen, T. J., Sørebø, A. M., & Sørebø, Ø. (2009). The role of task-technology fit as users’ motivation to continue information system use. Computers in human behavior, 25(3), 778-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.
Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.045
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-
Li, F., Aw, E. C.-X., Tan, G. W.-H., Cham, T.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2022). The Eureka moment in understanding luxury brand purchases! A non-linear fsQCA-ANN approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022. 103039
Liaw, S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2015). How factors of personal attitudes and learning environments affect gender difference toward mobile learning acceptance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2111
Liaw, S.-S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H.-M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.029
Lin, T.-C., Huang, S.-L., & Hsu, C.-J. (2015). A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product–the case of smartphones. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.11.
Liu, Y., Yu, C., & Damberg, S. (2022). Exploring the drivers and consequences of the “awe” emotion in outdoor sports–a study using the latest partial least squares structural equation modeling technique and necessary condition analysis. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 23(2), 278-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-04-2021-0097
Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., & Kurnia, S. (2017). To use or not to use: Modelling end user grumbling as user resistance in pre-implementation stage of enterprise resource planning system. Information Systems, 69, 164-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2017.06.
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10557-
Mazurowski, M. A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in radiology: some ethical considerations for radiologists and algorithm developers. Academic radiology, 27(1), 127-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Mishra, A., Shukla, A., Rana, N. P., Currie, W. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Re-examining post-acceptance model of information systems continuance: A revised theoretical model using MASEM approach. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102571
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104324
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in human behavior, 68, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2016.11.
Olya, H. G., & Altinay, L. (2016). Asymmetric modeling of intention to purchase tourism weather insurance and loyalty. Journal of business research, 69(8), 2791-2800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.
Olya, H. G., & Gavilyan, Y. (2017). Configurational models to predict residents’ support for tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 56(7), 893-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0047287516667850
Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of service research, 17(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513513337
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893-7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10722-w
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102310
Park, Y., Fiss, P. C., & El Sawy, O. A. (2020). Theorising the multiplicity of digital phenomena: The ecology of configurations, causal recipes, and guidelines for applying QCA. Management of Information Systems Quarterly, 44, 1493-1520. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/15816
Racero, F. J., Bueno, S., & Gallego, M. D. (2020). Predicting students’ behavioral intention to use open source software: A combined view of the technology acceptance model and self-determination theory. Applied Sciences, 10(8), 2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082711
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond, 240, 190-212.
Ramayah, T., Chiun, L. M., Rouibah, K., & May, O. S. (2014). Identifying priority using an importance-performance matrix analysis (ipma): The case of internet banking in Malaysia. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeA.2014010101
Ramayah, T., Yeap, J., Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., & Rahman, S. A. (2017). Testing a confirmatory model of facebook usage in smartpls using consistent PLS. International Journal of Business and Innovation, 3(2), 1-14.
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Olya, H. (2021). The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1571-1592. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2020-1059
Rezvani, A., Khosravi, P., & Dong, L. (2017). Motivating users toward continued usage of information systems: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.
Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865-1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH. In.
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in human behavior, 24(4), 1585-1604.
Rönkkö, M., & Ylitalo, J. (2011). PLS marker variable approach to diagnosing and controlling for method variance. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/researchmethods/
Ryan, R. (2009). Self determination theory and well being. Social Psychology, 84(822), 848. https://www.welldev.org.uk/wed-new/network/research-review/Review_1_Ryan.pdf
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness.
Sarstedt, M., Radomir, L., Moisescu, O. I., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Latent class analysis in PLS-SEM: A review and recommendations for future applications. Journal of business research, 138, 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.
Saxena, C., Baber, H., & Kumar, P. (2021). Examining the moderating effect of perceived benefits of maintaining social distance on e-learning quality during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 532-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211 007049
Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students' learning experiences: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.
Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & quantity, 55(3), 805-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
Sharma, P. N., Liengaard, B. D., Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: Extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2021-0748
Sheeran, P., Wright, C. E., Avishai, A., Villegas, M. E., Lindemans, J. W., Klein, W. M., Rothman, A. J., Miles, E., & Ntoumanis, N. (2020). Self-determination theory interventions for health behavior change: Meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling of randomised controlled trials. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 88(8), 726. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000421
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1177-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410
Susanto, P., Hoque, M. E., Nisaa, V., Islam, M. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2023). Predicting m-Commerce Continuance Intention and Price Sensitivity in Indonesia by Integrating of Expectation-Confirmation and Post-acceptance Model. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231188019. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231188019
Tam, C., Santos, D., & Oliveira, T. (2020). Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(1), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B., bin Abdullah Arshah, R., & Malik, S. I. (2020). Framework design of university communication model (UCOM) to enhance continuous intentions in teaching and e-learning process. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 817-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09904-
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wang, W., & Hsieh, J. (2006). Beyond routine: Symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organisational context. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems (Paper 48). Association for Information Systems. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2006/48/
Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Generative AI for Art Designing among Chinese Generation Z: A structural equation modeling approach. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.32456789
Yeralan, S., & Lee, L. A. (2023). Generative AI: Challenges to higher education. Sustainable Engineering and Innovation, 5(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7003672
Yuan, Y.-P., Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Lim, W.-L. (2021). Can COVID-19 pandemic influence experience response in mobile learning? Telematics and Informatics, 64, 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101676
Zaidouni, A., Idrissi, M. A. J., & Bellabdaoui, A. (2024). A Sugeno ANFIS Model Based on Fuzzy Factor Analysis for IS/IT Project Portfolio Risk Prediction. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 23(2), 139-176. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2024.23.2.
Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Comparing fsQCA with PLS-SEM: Predicting intended car use by national park tourists. Tourism Geographies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1543666
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Information and Communication Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-05Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
2002 - 2020
