Construction of Air Pollution Index with the Inclusion of Aggregated Weights of the Pollutants

Authors

  • Nur Syamimi Muhamad Fauzi Department of Decision Science, School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Maznah Mat Kasim Department of Decision Science, School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nor Hasliza Mat Desa Department of Statistics, School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2022.21.4.2

Keywords:

Aggregated weights, air pollution, hazardous levels, objective weighting method, subjective weighting method

Abstract

The ambient air quality measurement in Malaysia is described as Air Pollution Index (API). Basically the existing API for a given period of time is defined as the maximum value of the sub-index values of six pollutants. Although research has shown that long and short term exposure to air suspended toxicants has a different toxicological impact on human, the API still considers these pollutants as having equal hazardous impacts on human. Hence, this paper aims to propose a new API that includes weights representing different hazardous levels of these pollutants in its calculation. Based on secondary data of six pollutants’ readings for sixteen states of Malaysia for year 2018, the aggregated weights were computed by combining both weights obtained from the subjective experts’ opinions and the objective data-driven methods, which balanced both perspectives of evaluations. The results show that the particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 micrometre (PM2.5) found to be the most hazardous pollutant since its aggregated weight value is the highest and the distributions of the API readings for all sixteen states were found to be normal. The highest and lowest API readings took place on the 14th of August and 10 of March 2018 respectively. It is argued that the new API readings are more accurate and give a better picture about the occurrence of air pollution in Malaysia in particular. This study provides a new insight in constructing API specifically and contributes a more comprehensive and precise air quality measurements to be analysed by the responsible authorities in their efforts towards healthy environment.

References

Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science, 42(11), 1515–1523. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634518 Bonyadi, Z., Ehrampoush, M., Ghaneian, M., Mokhtari, M., & Sadegi,

A. (2016). Cardiovascular, respiratory, and total mortality attributed to PM2.5 in Mashhad, Iran. Environ Monit Assess, 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5574-y

Bottomley, P., Doyle, J., & Green, R. (2000). Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation. Journal of Marketing Research, 5008-513. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1558519

Choo, E., Schoner, B., & Wedley, W. (1999). Interpretation of criteria weights in multi-criteria decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 527–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0360-8352(00)00019-X

Department of Environment (DOE). (2020, January 20). Official portal of Department of Environment. Ministry of Environment: Journal of ICT, 21, No. 4 (October) 2022, pp: 495– Environmental Conservation, Our Shared Responsibility. Malaysia Govt. https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/en/infoumum/english-air-pollution-index-api/100

Chang, Y. C., Hsu, C. H., Williams, G., & Pan, M. L. (2008). Low cost carriers’ destination selection using a Delphi method panel. Tourism Management, 5(29), 898–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.11.004

Chen, J. J. G., & He, Z. (1997). Using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory to rate and rank the disability. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 88(1997), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01650114(96)00037-1

Desa, N., Jemain, A., & Kasim, M. (2015). Construction of a composite hospital admission index using the aggregated weights of criteria. Sains Malaysiana, 44(2), 239–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2015-4402-11 Ghorani‑Azam, A., Riahi‑Zanjani, B., & Balali‑Mood, M. (2016). Effects of air pollution on human health and practical measures for prevention in Iran. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 21(65). https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F1735-1995.189646

Hajkowicz, S. A., McDonald G. T., & Smith P. N. (2000). An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting techniques in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(4), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/713676575

Hwang, C., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple criteria decision making methods and applications. Springer. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Kasim, M. M. (2018). Aggregation of criteria weights for multiperson decision making with equal or different credibility. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 14(1), 1–7. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/12726/1/jqma-14-1paper1.pdf

Kasim, M. M. (2020). On the practical consideration of evaluators’ credibility in evaluating relative importance of criteria for some real-life multi-criteria problems: An overview. A book chapter of Multi-Criteria Optimization - Pareto-optimal and Related Principles. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92541

Kasim, M. M., & Jemain, A. A. (2020). Performance of entropy-based criteria weights in solving multi-criteria problems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1496, No. 1, p. 012015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1496/1/012015

Kasim M. M., Ibrahim H., & Bataineh M. S. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for determining computer preference Journal of ICT, 21, No. 4 (October) 2022, pp: 495– index. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 10, 137–148. https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/5905

Kaur, A., & Kumar, Y. (2021). Healthcare data analysis using water wave optimization based diagnostic model. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 20(4), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2021.20.4.1

Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., Hamid, R., & Ghazali, M. F. (2020). A modified CRITIC method to estimate the objective weights of decision criteria. Symmetry, 13, 973. http://doi.org/10.3390/ sym13060973

Lei, H., Chao, R., Tsering, J. V., Jun, B., & Yang, L. (2017). A comparison of individual exposure, perception, and acceptable levels of PM2.5 with air pollution policy objectives in China. Environmental Research, 78–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. envres.2017.05.012

Ma, J., Fan, Z., & Huang, L. (1999). A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6

Mannucci, P. M., & Franchini, M. (2017). Health effects of ambient air pollution in developing countries. Environmental Research and Public Health, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091048

Mohammed, A. J., Ghathwan, K. I., & Yusof, Y. (2020). A hybrid least squares support vector machine with bat and cuckoo search algorithms for time series forecasting. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 19(3), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2020.19.3.3

Mohammed H. J., Kasim, M. M., & Shaharanee, I. N. M. (2017). Selection of suitable e-learning approach using TOPSIS technique with best ranked criteria weights. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1905, No. 1, p. 040019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012207

Saaty, T. L. (2000). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill. International, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Sahu, D., Kannan, G., & Vijayaraghavan, R. (2014). Size-dependent effect of zinc oxide in toxicity and inflammatory potential of human monocytes. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental

Health, 77(2014), 177–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/152873 94.2013.853224

Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press. Journal of ICT, 21, No. 4 (October) 2022, pp: 495–

Silverman, B. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall.

Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi criteria decision making: A comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publisher. https://link. springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6

Von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. University Press.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2020, January 20). Air pollution. https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1.

Zardari, N., Ahmad, K., Shirazi, S., & Yusop, Z. (2015). Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Springer.

Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Downloads

Published

19-10-2022

How to Cite

Nur Syamimi Muhamad Fauzi, Mat Kasim, M., & Mat Desa, N. H. (2022). Construction of Air Pollution Index with the Inclusion of Aggregated Weights of the Pollutants. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 21(4), 495-512. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2022.21.4.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-05
1 citations, from OpenCitations — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2022.21.4.2 OpenAlex W4307446506 Scopus 85140794211

Most read articles by the same author(s)