Is Inflation Regressive or Progressive? Long Run & Short Run Evidence from Pakistan

Authors

  • Muhammad Shahbaz COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Pakistan
  • Abu N. M. Wahid Tennessee State University, United States
  • Rukhsana Kalim University of Management and Technology, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2010.17.2.2

Keywords:

Inflation, inequality, fully modifed ordinary least square, Pakistan

Abstract

The present paper investigates an answer to a key question “is inflation regressive or progressive?†by utilizing time series data from 1971 up to 2005 with reference to Pakistan. The main focus of the study is on the inflation-inequality puzzle but other control variables are also included in the model that affect income distribution. We have utilized the most advanced technique FMOLS (Fully-Modified Ordinary Least Square) for long run and ECM (Error Correction Model) for short run dynamics. Our findings suggest that inflation is progressive in the case of Pakistan but with low magnitude. There is also a prevalence of a U-shaped relationship between inflation and income inequality in non-linear or non-monotonic phenomenon, but it is insignificant. Per capita income deteriorates income distribution, and seems to provide gains to non-poor individuals in the economy. Remittances as share of GDP, and human capital, also appear to increase income inequality in both periods but large size of the government seems to worsen income distribution in the long run. International trade and income inequality are positively correlated that confirms the existence of Leontief paradox in Pakistan not only in short run, but also in long run. Financial development declines income inequality insignificantly. Inverted U-shaped curve (Lafer-Curve) indicates an association of trade and income inequality in non-linear fashion insignificantly. This effort provides some new insights for policy makers and development planners in Pakistan.
 
Keywords: Inflation; inequality; fully modifed ordinary least square; Pakistan.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agènor, P.-R. (2003). Does globalisation hurt the poor? World Bank, Mimeo, Washington.

Albanesi, S. (2007). Inflation and inequality. Journal of monetary Economics, 54, 1088–1114.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Nasir, A. (2004). ARDL approach to test the poductivity bias hypothesis. Review of Development Economics, 8, 483–488.

Bannerjee, A., Dolado, J., & Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in single equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19, 267–83.

Beetsma, R., & Ploeg, F. V. D. (1996). Does inequality cause inflation? The political economy of inflation taxation and government debt. Public Choice, 87, 143–162.

Bhattacharya, B., & Haslag. (2003). Inflationary finance in simple voting model. Iowa State University Department of Economics Working Paper 03012.

Bittencourt, M. F. M, (2006). Macroeconomic performance and inequality: Brazil 1983-94. CMPO Working Paper Series No. 05/114. IJMS 17 (2), 47–72 (2010) 69

Blank, R., & Blinder, A. (1986). Macroeconomics, income distribution, and poverty. In S. Danziger, & D. Weinger (Eds.), Fighting poverty: What works and what doesn’t. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bulir, A. (2001). The impact of macroeconomic policies on the distribution of income. Annals of Public and Cooperative http://ijms.uum.edu.my Economics, 72, 253–270.

Bulir, A., & Gulde. (1995). Inflation and income distribution: Further evidence on empirical links. IMF working paper 95/86, Washington, International Monetary Fund.

Bum., & Jeon. (2005). Demographic changes and economic growth in Korea. SKKU ERI WP-06/05.

Bowers, W. Pierce, G. (1975). The illusion of deterrence in isaac ehrlich’s work on the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Yale Law Journal, 85, 187–208.

Chu, K., Davoodi, H., & Gupta, S. (2000). Income distribution and tax and government social spending policies in developing countries. IMF working paper 00/62, Washington, International Monetary Fund.

Cole, J., & Towe, C. (1996). Income distribution and macroeconomic performance in the United States. IMF working paper 96/97, Washington, International Monetary Fund.

Crowe, C. (2005). Voting for inflation: The political economy of inflation and inequality. OCGD Economy Analysis 5.

Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565–591.

Desai, R., Olofsgard, A., & Yousef, T. (2005). Democracy, inequality, and inflation. American Political Science Review, 97, 391–406.

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2000). Growth is good for the poor. Working paper, Washington, World Bank.

Dolmas, J., Huffman, G., & Wynne, M. (2000). Inequality, inflation, and central bank independence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 33, 271–87.

Easterly, W., & Fischer, S. (2001). Inflation and the poor. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33, 160–178.

Economic Survey of Pakistan. (2005, 2007). published by Ministry of Finance, Pakistan.

Ehrlich, I. (1977). The deterrent effect of capital punishment reply. American Economic Review, 452–58.

Engle, R. F., & Granger, G. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276. 70 IJMS 17 (2), 47–72 (2010)

Ferreira, F., Prennushi, G., & Ravallion, M. (1999). Protecting the poor from macroeconomic shocks: An agenda for action in a crisis and beyond. World Bank Policy Research working paper 2160, Washington, World Bank.

Galli, R., & Hoeven, R. (2001). Is inflation bad for income inequality: The importance of the initial rate of inflation? EMPLOYMENT http://ijms.uum.edu.my PAPER, 2001/29.

Haroon, J. (2006). Does inequality matter for poverty reduction? Evidence from Pakistan’s poverty trends. The Pakistan Development Review, 45(3), 439–459.

Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in co-integrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of co-integrating vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551–1580.

Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.

Khan, A. A., Hyder, K. H. B., & Ahmed, Q. M. (2007). Determinants of recent inflation in Pakistan. SPDC’s Research Report No. 66.

Layson, S. (1983). Homicide and deterrence. Another view of the Canadian time series evidence. Canadian Journal of Economic, 16, 52–73.

Milanovic, B. (1994). Determinants of cross-country income inequality: An augmented Kuznets’ hypothesis. World Bank Policy Research working paper 1246, Washington, World Bank.

MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601–618.

Mocan, N. H. (1999). Structural unemployment, cyclical unemployment, and income inequality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81,122–134.

Pedroni, P. (1995). Panel co-integration: Asymptotic and unite sample properties of pooled time series test with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Indiana University Working Papers in Economics, No. 95-013.

Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous co-integrated panels. In B., Baltagi, (Ed.), Non-stationary panels, panel co-integration, and dynamic panels, advances in econometrics (pp. 93–130). Vol. 15, Amsterdam: JAI Press.

Pesaran, M. H., & Pesaran, B. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. IJMS 17 (2), 47–72 (2010) 71

Pesaran, Shin., & Smith. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.

Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variable regression with I (1) Processes. Review of Economics Studies, 57, 99–125.

Phillips, P. C. B., & Moon, H. R. (1999). Linear regression limits theory http://ijms.uum.edu.my for non-stationary panel data. Econometrica, 67, 1057–1111.

Powers, E. T. (1995). Inflation, unemployment, and poverty revisited. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 3rd quarter, 2–13.

Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (1998). Monetary policy and the well-being of the poor. NBER working paper 6793, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Shahabz, M. (2007). Does globalisation benefit the poor? Evidence from Pakistan. Proceedings of International Conference on Poverty and Distribution Amidst Diversity: Options and Challenges for Development, 2007, pp: 175–200.

Shahabz, M. (2008). Does globalization benefit the poor? Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 15, 61–80.

Shahbaz, M., Butt, M. S., & Aamir, N. (2007). Trade and inequality nexus in Pakistan: Under investigation of alternative techniques. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 9, 57–72.

Stark, O. Taylor, J. E., & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. Economic Journal, 96, 722–740.

Tanzi, V. (1998). Fundamental determinants of inequality and the role of government. IMF working paper 98/178, Washington, International Monetary Fund.

Yoshino, O. (1993). Size distribution of workers’ household income and macroeconomic activities in Japan: 1963-88. Review of Income and Wealth, 39, 387–402. 72 IJMS 17 (2), 47–72 (2010)

Downloads

Published

29-12-2010

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2010): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 17, No.2 December 2010

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-20
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2010.17.2.2