Satisfying Customers Using Total Quality Management: The Mediating Role of Control Systems

Authors

  • Zulnaidi Yaacob School of Distance Education Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ommei Kolsum S. Router School of Distance Education Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2010.17.1.3

Keywords:

Total quality management, control system

Abstract

The premise of this paper is that Total Quality Management (TQM) must be adopted as a way of life for employees and not just as a slogan per se, so that the intended goal of implementing TQM can be fully realised. In order to internalise the philosophy of TQM into each organisational member, control systems play an important role. Control systems, among others, are implemented as systems for aligning the intended objectives of TQM and the individual objectives of each employee. The findings of this study supported the contingency theory that suggested the control systems being practised should be aligned with the strategy pursued to achieve the intended objectives. This paper extends the current existing knowledge by investigating the mediating role of control systems in explaining the relationship between TQM and customer satisfaction.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersen, H.V., Lawrie, G., & Savic, N. (2004). Effective quality management through third generation balanced scorecard. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(7), 634-645.

Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

Banker, R.D., Potter, G., & Schroeder, R.G. (1993). Reporting manufacturing performance measures to workers: An empirical study. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 1(5), 33-55.

Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variable. New York: Wiley.

Chenhall, R.H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 28, 127-168.

Dahlgaard-Park, S.M. (2008). Reviewing the European excellence model from a management control view. The TQM Journal, 20(2), 98-119.

Daniel, S.J., & Reitsperger, W.D. (1991). Linking quality strategy with management control systems: Empirical evidence from Japanese industry. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 16(7), 601-618.

Dunn, S.C., Seaker, R.F., & Waller, M.A. (1994). Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Logistics, 15(2), 145-172.

Ehigie, B.O., & McAndrew, E.B. (2005). Innovation, diffusion, and adoption of total quality management (TQM). Management Decision, 43(6), 925-940.

Goold, M., & Quinn, J.J. (1993). Strategic control: Milestones for long-term performance. London: Pitman Publishing.

Gustafsson, A., Nilsson, L., & Johnson, M.D. (2003). The role of quality practices in service organisations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 232-244.

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, (5th ed.) USA: Prentice Hall. IJMS 17 (1), 37-53 (2009) 51

Herath, S.K. (2007). A framework for management control research. Journal of Management Development, 26(9), 895-915.

Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Koopman, P.L., & Van der Flier, H. (2005). Total quality management: The need for an employee-centred coherent approach. www.ijms.uum.edu.my The TQM Magazine, 17(1), 92-103.

Ibrahim, F.W., & Abd. Karim, M.Z. (2004). Efficiency of local governments in Malaysia and its correlates. International Journal of Management Studies, 11(1), 57-70.

Ittner, C.D., & Larcker, D.F. (1997). Quality strategy, strategic control systems and organizational performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(3/4) 295-314.

Kanji, G.K. (2002). Measuring business excellence. Routledge advances in management and business studies. london: Routledge.

Kaplan R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Kelloway, E.K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modelling: A researcher’s guide. California, USA: Sage Publications.

Othman, R. (2000). Contingencies of quality management approach: Evidence from the manufacturing sector. Utara Management Review, 1(2), 57-68.

Mehra, S., & Ranganathan, S. (2009). Implementing total quality management with a focus on enhancing customer satisfaction. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(9), 913-927.

Modell, S. (2009). Bundling management control innovations. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 22(1), 59-90.

Moores, K., & Chenhall, R.H. (1994). Framework and MAS evidence (in) Strategic management accounting: Australasian cases. (Eds). Mores, K. Brisbane: John Wiley.

Morsing, M., & Oswald, D. (2009). Sustainable leadership: Management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordick A/S, Corporate Governance, 9(1), 83-99.

Nunnaly, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.

Shields, M.D., Deng, F.J., & Kato, Y. (2000). The design and effects of control systems: Tests of direct and indirect effects models. Accounting, Organisations, and Society, 25, 185-202.

Swamidass, P.M., & Newell, W.L. (1987). Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: A path analytic model. Management Science, 33(4), 509-524.

Terziovski, M. (2006). Quality management practices and their relationship with customer satisfaction and productivity improvement. Management Research News, 29(7), 414-424.

Tippins, M.J., & Sohi, R.S. (2003). It competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 745-761. 52 IJMS 17 (1), 37-53 (2010)

Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.

Weerakon, T.S. (1996). Organizational performance - A stakeholder concept. www.ijms.uum.edu.my Proceedings of International Research Conference on Quality Management, 80-90. IJMS 17 (1), 37-53 (2009) 53 www.ijms.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

30-06-2010

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2010.17.1.3