Ramalan Niat Gelagat Kepatuhan Zakat Pendapatan Gaji: Perbandingan Teori Tindakan Beralasan dan Teori Gelagat Terancang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2009.16.2.1Keywords:
Sikap, norma subjektif, kawalan gelagat ditanggap, niat, zakat, TTB, TGTAbstract
Downloads
References
Anon. (2000). 50,000 pekerja Islam dikesan layak bayar zakat. (2000, Sept. 15). Utusan Malaysia, Utara, Sept. 15. hlm.25.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. 16 IJMS 16 (2), 1-19 (2009)
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B.L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207-224.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
Anderson, A.G., & Lavallee, D. (2007, in press). Applying the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to athlete training adherence behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review. www.ijms.uum.edu.my
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS users’ guide version 4.0, Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.
Bobek, D. D. (1997). Tax fairness: How do individuals judges fairness and what effects does it have on their behavior. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.
Bobek, D.D., & Hatfield, R.C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15, 13-38.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit, in Testing structural equation models. K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long, (Eds.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-62.
Elliott, M. A, Armitage, C. J., & Baughan, C. J. (2003). Driver’s compliance with speed limits: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 964-972.
Fang, K., & Shih, Y. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213-223.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hairunnizam Wahid, Sanep Ahmad & Mohd Ali Mohd Noor. (2006). Kesedaran membayar zakat pendapatan di Malaysia. Laporan tidak diterbitkan. Pusat Pengajian Ekonomi, Fakulti Ekonomi & Perniagaan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. IJMS 16 (2), 1-19 (2009) 17
Hagger, M.S., & Chatzisarantis, N.L.D. (2005). First and higher-order models of attitudes, normative influence, and perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behaviour, Bristish Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 513-535.
Hanno, D., & Violette, G.R. (1996). An analysis of moral and social influences on taxpayer behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 57-75.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. www.ijms.uum.edu.my
Ingram, K. L., Cope, J. G., Harju, B. L., & Wuensch, K. L. (2000). Applying to graduate school: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2), 215-226.
Kamil Md Idris. (2002). Gelagat kepatuhan zakat gaji di kalangan kakitangan awam. (Tesis Ph.D tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
Kamil Md Idris, Chek Derashid, & Engku Ismail Engku Ali. (1997, Nov.). Zakat penggajian: Suatu tinjauan terhadap pengetahuan dan amalan Muslimin negeri Perlis, Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Seminar Penyelidikan Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah.
Miniard, P. W., & Cohen, J. B. (1983). Modeling personal and normative influences on behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 169-180.
Oliver, R.L., & Bearden, W.O. (1985). Crossover effects in the theory of reasoned action: A moderating influence attempt. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 324-340.
Mohd Yusof Abas. (1981). 40 hadith pilihan. Kuala Lumpur: Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia.
Notani, A.S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control’s predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 247-271.
Rah, J.H., Hasler, C.M., Painter, J.E., & Chapman-Novakofski, K. M. (2004). Applying the theory of planned behavior to women’s behavioral attitudes on and consumption of soy products. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, 36, 238-244.
Ryan, M. J. (1982). Behavioural intention formation: The interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 263-278.
Shimp, T. A., & Kavas, A. (1984). The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 795-809.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137-55. 18 IJMS 16 (2), 1-19 (2009)
Trafimow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Finlay, K.A. (2002). Evidence that perceived behavioral control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. British Journal of Social Psychological, 41, 101-121.
Zainol Bidin, & Kamil Md Idris. (2007). The role of attitude and subjective norm on intention to comply zakat on employment income. IKaZ International Journal of Zakat, 1(1). www.ijms.uum.edu.my IJMS 16 (2), 1-19 (2009) 19
Published
Issue
Section
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- OpenCitations 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Scopus 0 not indexed View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →












