The Relationship between Transaction Costs Of External Financing And Dividend Policy: Evidence From Malaysia

Authors

  • Yusnidah Ibrahim College of Business Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Rizal Mazlan College of Business Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2008.15.1.4

Abstract

The presence of transaction costs calls for the emphasis to be given to residual dividend policy, a policy that attempts to minimise transaction costs of external financing by accommodating capital expenditure financing requirement in companies’ dividend policy. In Malaysia, dividend increases are often perceived positively, regardless of the company’s requirement for funding future capital expenditure, and hence the extent of the influence of transaction costs on dividend policy is questionable. This study, therefore, was undertaken to examine this issue by investigating the relationship between dividend payout ratio and various proxies for transaction costs. The study found that standard deviation of return is negatively and statistically significant in influencing DPR, which indicates that consideration has been given to transaction costs since riskier companies tend to face higher transaction costs. The insignificance of other variables, however, implies that either these variables have little influence on transaction costs or that less emphasis is given by Malaysian companies in general to transaction costs relative to other factors in dividend decision-making.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, N. A. H., Abdul Rashid, R., & Ibrahim, Y. (2002). The effect of dividend announcements on stock returns for companies 82 IJMS 15 (1), 71-83(2008) listed on the main board of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Malaysian Management Journal, 1&2, 81-89. www.ijms.uum.edu.my

Alli, K. L., Khan, Q., & Ramirez, G. G. (1993). Determinants of corporate dividend policy: A factorial analysis. The Financial Review, 28, 523-547.

Barth, J. R., Li, T., Malaiyandi, S. McCarthy, D., Phumiwasana, T., & Yago, G. (2005). Capital Access Index; Securitization in Financing Economic Activities. Milken Institute.

Collins, M. C, Saxena, A. K., & Wansley, J. W. (1996). The role of insiders and dividend policy: A comparison of regulated and unregulated firms. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 9(2), 1-9.

Crutchley, C. E. (1987). The agency cost of finance decision making: An empirical analysis. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Virgina Polytechnic Institute and State University.

D’Souza, J., & Saxena, A. K. (1999). Agency cost, market risk, investment opportunities and dividend policy – An international perspective. Managerial Finance, 25(6), 35-43.

Fama, E. F. (1974). The empirical relationships between dividend and investment decision of firms. American Economic Review, June, 304-318.

Higgins, R. C. (1972). The corporate dividend-saving decision. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7(2), 1527-41.

Holder, M. E., Langrehr, F. W., & Hexter, J. L. (1998). Dividend policy determinants: An investigation of the influences of stakeholder theory. Financial Management, (Autumn).

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3.

Mansor, M. I., & Subramaniam, V. (1992). The effect of dividends and earnings announcements on stock prices in Malaysian stock market. Journal of Economics Studies, 29, 35-49.

Miller, M., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411-433.

Myers, S., & Majluf, S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, June, 187-221.

Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of payout ratios. Journal of Financial Research, Fall, 249-259.

Sutrisno. (2001). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi dividend payout ratio pada perusahaan publik di Indonesia. TEMA, 2(1), 1-12. 83 IJMS 15 (1), 71-83 (2008) www.ijms.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

26-06-2008

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-24
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2008.15.1.4 OpenAlex W3041522165

Most read articles by the same author(s)