Does Price React to Fixed Price Tender Offer Share Buyback Announcement?

Authors

  • Hanita Kadir Shahar Faculty of Finance and Banking Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nur Adiana Hiau Abdullah Faculty of Finance and Banking Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2006.13.1.4

Abstract

This paper investigates stock market reactions to share buyback announcements, specifically with the fixed price tender offer mechanism. An event study methodology was used to examine stock price reaction of 30 observations involving 21 listed companies surrounding the announcement dates. Two models, namely market adjusted return (MAR) and the single index market models (SIMM) were utilised to compute abnormal returns. Eventhough most literature in the western market found positive abnormal returns, this study reveals that investors gain zero abnormal returns out of these announcements. The post announcement result shows a zero abnormal return which implies that the Malaysian stock market is semi-strongly efficient due to this announcement. Finally, evidence also shows that none of the implications forwarded in the theories could be supported in this study.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariff, M., & Finn, F. J. (1989). Announcement effect and market efficiency: An empirical application to the Singapore equity market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 6(2), 243-265.

Chhachhi, S., & Davidson, W. (1997). A comparison of market reaction to specially designated dividends and tender offer stock repurchase. Financial Management, 26, 89-96

Comment, R., & Jarell, G. (1991). The relative signaling power of Dutch Auction and Fixed Price Self Tender Offers and Open Market Share repurchases. Journal Of Finance, XV1 (4).

Dann, L. Y. (1981). Common stock repurchases: An Analysis of returns to Bondholders and Shareholders. Journal of Financial Economics, 113-138.

Dennis & McConnell, (1986). Additional evidence on equity ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595-612.

Dimson, E. (1979). Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 197-226.

Erwin, G., & Miller M. (1998). The intra industry effects of Open Market Share Repurchases: Contagion or Competitive. The Journal of Financial Research, XX1 (4), 389-406.

Jensen, M. (1986). Agency cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and The Take-overs. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.

Lim, E. H.,s & Obiyathulla, I. B. (2002). Price reaction to stock repurchases: Evidence from the Bursa Malaysia. Capital Market Review, 10(1), 139-177.

Mohd, J., & Chin, Y. F. (2001).The effect of share buyback announcement in the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange paper presented at the Malaysian Finance Association 3rd. Annual Symposium, Kuala Lumpur.

Nohel, T., & Tarhan, V. (1998). Share repurchases and firm performance: New evidence on the agency costs of free cash flow. Journal of 58 IJMS 14 (1), 39-59 (2006) Financial Economics, 4, 187-222

Nur-Adiana, H. A. (1999). An empirical investigation of the effect of www.ijms.uum.edu.my Rights Issue announcements on share returns and the determinants of abnormal returns on the Bursa Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Aston University.

Person, J. C. (1990). Dutch auction repurchases: Coping with uncertainty about shareholder response to tender offers. Working paper. University of Chicago.

Stephen, C. P., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Actual share acquisition in Open Market repurchase program. The Journal of Finance, 313–333.

Vermaelen, T. (1981). Common stock repurchase and market signaling. Journal of Financial Economics, 9,149-183. IJMS 14 (1), 39-59 (2006) 59

Downloads

Published

01-06-2006

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2006.13.1.4 OpenAlex W7009430784

Most read articles by the same author(s)