Malaysian Indirect Tax Administration System: An Analysis of Efficiency and Taxpayers’ Perceptions

Authors

  • Muzainah Mansor Faculty of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mahamad Tayib Faculty of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Rohana @ Norliza Yusof Faculty of Accountancy Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2005.12.2.2

Keywords:

Globalisation, tax administration, indirect taxes, and efficiency

Abstract

This study examines the level of efficiency of the indirect taxes administration system. The level of efficiency was analysed through the trends of the costrevenue ratio; arrears-revenue ratio; and revenue detected-collected ratio. Further investigation was carried out to see whether the Malaysian indirect tax system has all the characteristics of a good tax system as perceived by the taxpayers based on the tenets proposed by the Institute Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (ICAEW). The result of the study revealed that the Malaysian Customs Department has been collecting less indirect taxes revenue each year as compared to the costs incurred in the process of acquiring the revenue. An analysis on the ratio of total arrears to total revenue collected also indicated that uncollected indirect tax revenues is on the increasing trend. It shows that the rate of increase in the amount of overdue taxes is more than the amount of revenue collected each year. It was also revealed that on the average, only 60% of the revenue loss detected could be recovered for the period 1995 to 2001. The trend of collection has been rather stable even though the revenue detected had increased. Regarding the characteristics of a good tax system, based on the respondents surveyed, there are mixed responses for each characteristic as perceived by the taxpayers. The findings revealed that there is an existence of a good legislation under the tax system and the tax system is constant and regularly reviewed. However, they had disagreed that the present system is certain and simple; proper consultation has been made before any new legislation is issued; and that the overall system is fair. From all the characteristics suggested, the taxpayers ranked “statutory†as the highest and “proper consultation†as the lowest.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barjoyai Bardai (1993). Malaysian Tax Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.

BBC English Dictionary (1993). London: Harper Collins Publishers.

Coakes, S. & Steed, L. (2001). SPSS Analysis Without Anguish. Australia: John Wiley and Sons.

Cox, E. P. (1979). Marketing Research: Information for Decision Making. New York: Harper and Row.

HMSO (1981). Alternatives to Domestic Rates, Cmnd. 8449. London. Retrieved from http://www.customs.gov.my.

Hussey, J. & Hussey, R. (1997). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. London: MacMillan.

ICAEW (1999). Towards a Better Tax System, Tax Faculty: Tax Guide 2/00.

Ishi, H. (1993). The Japanese Tax System. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jackson, P. M. (1994). Efficient Local Government Finance: The Never Ending Story. In Towards Restructuring: The Dimensions of Change in Local Government. In F. Terry (Ed.). A Public Finance Foundation Reader (55-62). London: CIPFA.

James, S. & Nobes, C. (1983). The Economics of Taxation. New Delhi: Heritage Publishers.

Kelly, P. L. & Oldman, O. (1973). Readings on Income Tax Administration. New York: The Foundation Press Inc.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioural Research, (2nd ed.), New York.

Meade Report (1978). A Report of a Committee Chaired by Professor J. E. Meade on The Structure and Reform of the Direct Taxation. IFS London.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1960). Economic Report 1960-61. IJMS 12 (2), 19-40 (2005) www.ijms.uum.edu.my

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1965). Economic Report 1965-66.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1970). Economic Report 1970-71.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1975). Economic Report 1975-76.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1979). Economic Report 1979-80.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1980). Economic Report 1980-81.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1981). Economic Report 1981-82.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1982). Economic Report 1982-83.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1983). Economic Report 1983-84.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1984). Economic Report 1984-85.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1985). Economic Report 1985-86.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1986). Economic Report 1986-87.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1987). Economic Report 1987-88.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1988). Economic Report 1988-89.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1991). Economic Report 1991-92.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1993). Economic Report 1993-94.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1995). Economic Report 1995-96.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1996). Economic Report 1996-97.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1997). Economic Report 1997-98.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1998). Economic Report 1998-99.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (1999). Economic Report 1999-00.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (2000). Economic Report 2000-01.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (2001). Economic Report 2001-02.

Ministry of Finance, Malaysia (2002). Economic Report 2002-03.

Murphy, K. & Byng, K. (2002). A User’s Guide to the Australian Tax System Survey of Tax Scheme Investors. Centre for Tax Scheme Integrity, the Australian National University.

Mustafa, H. M. H. (1996). An Evaluation of the Malaysian Tax Administrative System, and Taxpayers’ Perceptions Towards Assessment Systems, Tax Law Fairness, and Tax Law Complexity. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

RM4.2b in Unpaid Taxes. (2002, June 12). New Straits Times.

RM1.2b Loss of Tax Revenue. (2003, June 7). New Straits Times.

O’Brien Report (1982). 1st Report of the Commission on Taxation – Direct Taxation chaired by Miriam Hederman O’Brien.

Ridge, M. & Smith, S. (1991). Local Taxation: The Options and the Argument. IFS: Report Series No. 38 May.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1992). Annual Report 1991. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1993). Annual Report 1992. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1994). Annual Report 1993. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1995). Annual Report 1994. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia. IJMS 12 (2), 19-40 (2005) www.ijms.uum.edu.my

Royal Customs Malaysia (1996). Annual Report 1995. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1997). Annual Report 1996. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1998). Annual Report 1997. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (1999). Annual Report 1998. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (2000). Annual Report 1999. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (2001). Annual Report 2000. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Royal Customs Malaysia (2002). Annual Report 2001. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. (E. Cannan Ed., 1904), 2. New York.

Surrey, S. S. (1975). Tax Administration in Underdeveloped Countries. In R. M. Bird & O. Oldman (Eds.), Readings on Taxation in Developing Countries, (3rd ed.), (379-499). London: John Hopkins University Press.

Tayib, M. (1998). The Determinants of Assessment Tax Collection: The Malaysian Local Authority Experience. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Glamorgan, U.K.

Vlassenko, I. (2001). Evaluation of the Efficiency and Fairness of British, French and Sweedish Property Tax Systems. Property Management (Bradford), 19(5), 384. IJMS 12 (2), 19-40 (2005) www.ijms.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

01-12-2005

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-24
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2005.12.2.2 OpenAlex W7030068338