Penilaian Terhadap Kecekapan Relatif Industri Pengagihan Elektrik di Selangor Menggunakan Kaedah Analisis Penyampulan Data (APD)

Authors

  • Muhammad Zaini Ahmad Pusat Kemahiran Komunikasi dan Keusahawanan Kolej Universiti Kejuruteraan Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Wan Rosmanira Ismail Pusat Pengajian Sains Matematik Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2005.12.1.8

Keywords:

Analisis Penyampulan Data, kecekapan relatif, pengagihan elektrik

Abstract

Kajian ini dijalankan dengan tujuan untuk menilai dan mengenal pasti kecekapan penggunaan sumber oleh Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) ke atas sepuluh kawasan pengagihan elektrik di Selangor. Berdasarkan kepada datauntuk tiga input dan dua output bagi tahun 2002, model CCR yangberorientasikan input digunakan dan mendapati 4 daripada 10 kawasanpengagihan elektrik di Selangor didapati cekap. Bagi setiap kawasanpengagihan yang tidak cekap, model ini mengenal pasti sumber dan tingkatketidakcekapan bagi setiap input dan output. Satu set sasaran bagi setiapinput dan output ditentukan bagi 6 kawasan pengagihan yang tidak cekap.Dengan menggunakan purata magnitud bagi setiap input, keputusanmenunjukkan bahawa perbelanjaan operasi dan penyelenggaraan merupakaninput yang paling penting (61.86%), diikuti dengan perbelanjaan ke atasgaji pekerja (23.80%) dan perbelanjaan ke atas peralatan utama (14.34%).

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banker, R. D. & Morey, R. (1986). Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed input and output. Operations Research, 34(4), 513-521, 186 IIMS 12 (1), 173-187 (2005)

Burns, P. & Weyman-Jones, T. (1996). Cost functions and cost efficiency in electricity distribution : a stochastic frontier approach, Bulletin of Economics Research, 48(1), 41-64,

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444,

Chames, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27(6), 668-697.

Chen, T. ¥. (2002). An assesment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in Taiwan's Electricity Distribution Sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 421-433.

Clagett, E. T., Hollas, D. & Stansell, S. (1995), The effects of ownership from on profit maximization and cost minimization behavior within municipal and cooperative electrical distribution utilities. Quartely Review of Economics and Finance, 35 (special issue), 533-550.

De-Border, K. (1996). Radial and nonradial measure of technical efficiency : An empirical illustration for Belgian Local Governments using an FDH reference technology. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 71), 41-62.

Farrel, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281,

Miliotis, P. A. (1992). Data envelopment analysis applied to electricity distribution districts. Journal of Operational Research Society, 43(5), 549-555.

Pahwa, A., Feng, X. & Lubkeman, D. (2002). Perfomance evaluations of electric distribution utilities based on Data Envelopment Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systent, 17(3), 400-405,

Salvanes, K. G. & Tjotta, S. (1990). Cost Differrences in Electricity Distribution : Economies of Scale and Economies of Density in the Norwegian Electricity Distribution Industry. WP Center for Applied Research, Oslo,

Syed Othmawi Abd Rahman & Faridah Maarof. (1993). Analisis penyampulan data. Proceedings of the Management Science Operations Research Seminar on ‘OR’ for Effective Decision Making, 21-22 Julai 1993. ITM Shah Alam, 36-48.

Weyman-Jones, T. G. (1991). Productive efficiency in a regulated industry: The area electricity boatd of England and Wales. Energy Economies, 13, 116-122. IIMS 12 (1), 173-187 (2005) 187

Downloads

Published

29-06-2005

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2005): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 12, No. 1 June 2005

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2005.12.1.8 OpenAlex W76719759