Consumer Ethnocentrism: The Relationship with Domestic Products Evaluation and Buying Preferences

Authors

  • Nazlida Muhamad @ Hashim Faculty of Business Management Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Razli Che Razak Faculty of Technology Management Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2004.11.2

Keywords:

consumer ethnocentrism, buying preferences, product evaluation, international marketing

Abstract

Malaysia is one ASEAN developing county, which has attracted the attention of foreign investors and marketers. ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), which was realized in 2003, brings foreign products to Malaysian consumers with more affordable deals. The issue of globalisation that has been debated around the world could also carry the same impact or even more towards local products. One party that plays a major role in these issues is the Malaysian consumer. Do they think domestic products are of good quality? Are they willing to buy domestic products? These are the questions that should be answered in determining the future of domestic products. Consumer ethnocentrism is a marketing concept/construct that measures consumers' prejudice against imports. Consumers who score high on consumer ethnocentrism overestimate domestic products' and underestimate imports. The objective of this study is to investigate whether consumer ethnocentrism has an impact on Malaysian consumers buying preferences and domestic products' evaluations. Findings from this study showed that more than 80% of the respondents were highly ethnocentric consumers. Results also showed that consumer ethnocentrism has a significant relationship to buying preferences and domestic products' evaluations. Despite positive evaluation on domestic products' evaluation, preferences to buy domestic products found to be varied across types of products. The sample most preferred to buy domestic food products and rated no preference to domestic cars and personal computers. The study also found that demographic variables of age, gender, income and education have no significant relationship with consumer ethnocentrism. The implications of the study and future research areas are also discussed.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balabanis, G., Diamantopoulos, A., Mueller D., R. & Melewar, R. (2001). The impact of nationalism, patriotism and internalism on con-sumer ethnocentric tendencies. Journal of International Business Study, 32, 157-173.

Bruning, E.R. (1997). Country of origin, national loyalty and product choice: The case of international air travel. International Market-ing Review, 14, 59-74.

Caruana, A. & Magri, E. (1996). The effects of dogmatism and social class on consumer ethnocentrism in Malta. Marketing Intelligence Planning, 14 (4), 39-44.

Davis, H.L., Douglas, S.P. & Silk, A.J. (1981, Spring). Measure Unreliability: A hidden threat to cross-national marketing research? 42 IJMS 11 (SPECIAL ISSUES), 29-44 (2004) Journal of Marketing, 45, 98-108.

Good, L. K., & Huddleston, P. (1995). Ethnocentrism of polish and russian consumers: Are feelings and intentions related? In-ternational Marketing Review, 12, 35-48.

Herche, J. (1992, Summer). A note on the predictive validity of the CETSCALE. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 261-4.

Herche, J. (1994). Ethnocentric tendencies, marketing strategy and import purchase behaviour. International Marketing Review, 11, 4-16.

Huddleston, P., Good, L.K. & Stoel, L. (2001). Consumer ethnocen-trism, product necessity and Polish consumers’ perceptions of quality. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Manage-ment, 29, 236-246.

Kucukemiroglu, O. (1999). Market segmentation by using consumer lifestyle dimension and ethnocentrism: An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 470-487.

Lundstrom, W. J., Lee, O. W. & White, D. 5. (1998). Factors influencing Taiwanese consumer preference for foreign-made white goods: USA versus Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 10, 5-29.

Mager, J. & Hulpke, J.F. (1990). Social class in a classless society: Mar-keting implication for China. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 2 (4), 57-87.

Martinez, L.T., Zapata, I.]., & Gareia, B. 5. (2000). Consumer ethnocen-trism measurement, an assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE in Spain. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 1353-1373.

Marcoux, J., Filiatrault, P., & Cheron, E. (1997). The attitude underly-ing preferences of young urban educated polish consumers to-wards products made in Western Countries. Journal of Inter-national Consumer Marketing, 9, 4,5-29.

Netemeyer, R.G, Durvasula, S., & Lichtenstein, D.R. (1991). A cross-national asessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 320-327.

Rawwas, M.Y.A., Rajendran, K.N., & Wuehrer, G. A. (1996). The influ-ence of world mindedness and nationalism on consumer evalu-ation of domestic and foreign products. International Marketing Reviews, 13, 20-39.

Shimp, T.A., & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construc-tion and validation of CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 280-289.

Sharma, 5., & Shimp, T. A. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Markeling Science, 23 (1), 26-38. IJMS 11 (SPECIAL ISSUES), 29-44 (2004) 43

Shin, J. (1993). Antecedents and moderators of consumer ethnocentrism, and effect of source country characteristics on consumers’ altitudes toward purchasing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Busi-ness Administration, University of South Carolina.

Sumner, W.G.(1906). Folkways: The sociological importance of usages, man-ners, customs, mores, and morals. New York: Ginn and Co.

Watson, J.J., & Wright, K. (2000). Consumer ethnocentrism and atti-tudes toward domestic and foreign products. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 1149-1166, 44 JMS 11 (SPECIAL ISSUES), 29-44 (2004)

Downloads

Published

25-02-2004

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
2 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2004.11.2 OpenAlex W7018214464