Advertizing, Concentration and Profitability in Malaysian Manufacturing Revisited: A Simultaneous Equation Approach

Authors

  • Shri Dewi Subramaniam Fakulti Ekonomi Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nor Ghani Md. Nor Fakulti Ekonomi Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Zainuddin Abdullah Fakulti Ekonomi dan Pengurusan Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2004.11.2.4

Abstract

The original Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) paradigm that postulates a unidirectional relationship between concentration, advertizing and profitability had been used as the theoretical framework for many empirical works in industrial organizations before the mid seventies. Thereafter, doubts had begun to surface over the unidirectional postulate and there is new theory suggesting simultaneous interdependence. Unfortunately, not only are Malaysian studies in this area few and far between (exhaustive literature review yields only three published studies namely, Gan and Tham, 1977; Gan, 1978; and Rugayah, 1992), they also failed to incorporate the more recent theoretical development on the simultaneity of effects. This paper revisits the SCP paradigm as applied to the relationship among concentration, advertizing and profitability by conducting an empirical test that allows for simultaneous interdependence among variables. A set of three equations was estimated using three stage least squares (3SLS). The results provide considerable support to the feedforward and feedback effects between the three variables. Advertizing intensity exerts a significant influence on profit and concentration in the industry and there exists a feedback effect running from concentration to advertizing intensity. This finding suggests that advertizing does have an anti-competitive impact on the industry and therefore has a direct bearing on competition policy analysis.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berndt, R. E. (1991). The practice of econometrics: Classic and contemporary. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. IJMS 11 (2), 63-72 (2004) 71

Caves, R. E., Khalizadah-Shirazi, J. & Porter, M. E. (1975). Scale economies in statistical analysis of market power. Review of Economics and Statistics, 57, 133-140.

Comanor, S. C. & Wilson, T. A. (1976). Advertizing, market structure and performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49.

Comanor, S. C. & Wilson, T. A. (1974). The effect of advertizing on competition: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 453-476.

Comanor, S. C & Wilson, T. A. (1974). Advertizing and market power. www.ijms.uum.edu.my Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.

Gan, W. B. (1978). The relationship between concentration and profitability in Malaysian manufacturing. The Malaysian Economic Review, 23 (1), 1-13.

Gan, W. B & Tham, S. Y. (1977). Market structure and price-cost margins in manufacturing industries. The Developing Economies, 15 (3), 280-292.

Rugayah, Mohamed. (1992). The measurement of market concentration and profitability in Malaysian manufacturing. The Malaysian Economic Review, 23 (1), 1-11.

Pagoulatos, E. & Sorensen, R. (1981). A simultaneous equation analysis of advertizing, concentration and profitability. Southern Economic Journal, 728 -740.

Schmalensee, R. (1972). The economies of advertizing. New York: Oxford American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc.

Strickland A. O. & Weiss, L. W. (1976). Advertizing, concentration and price cost margins. Journal of Political Economy, 84 (5), 1109-1122. 72 IJMS 11 (2), 63-72 (2004)

Downloads

Published

30-12-2004

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2004.11.2.4 OpenAlex W55057598

Most read articles by the same author(s)