Tingkah Laku Etika Ketua dan Subordinat di Bank-Bank di Utara Malaysia

Authors

  • Abdullah Hj. Abdul Ghani Fakulti Pengurusan Perniagaan Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2004.11.1.13

Keywords:

Etika, tingkah laku, moral, ketua, subordinat, bank

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti tahap, perbezaan dun perkaitan tingkah laku etika ketua dengan tingkah laku etika subordinat serta pengaruh tingkah laku etika ketua terhadap tingkah laku etika subordinat di sektor perbankan. Pendekatan kajian menggunakan kaedah survey di lapangan. Kajian ini terhad kepada semua bank di Kedah dun Perlis. Data daripada 77pasangan responden(ketua dun subordinat semerta) yang mengembalikan soul selidik telah dianalisis. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan kebanyakan ketua (64.9%) berada pada tahap pascakonvensional, sementara kebanyakan subordinat (46.8%) pula pada tahap konvensional. Lanjutan daripada itu, kajian mendapati tingkah laku etika ketua dun tingkah laku etika subordinat adalah berbeza secara signifkan. Skor "Defining Issue Test" (DIT) masing-masing ialah 67.39 dun 57.14. Kita juga mendapati korelasi di antara tingkah laku etika subordinat dengan tingkah laku etika ketua adalah negatif dun tidak signifikan. Sehubungan itu, kajian menunjukkan tiada cukup bukti untuk menyatakan ada pengaruh tingkah laku etika ketua terhadap tingkah laku etika subordinat. Sungguhpun begitu, tingkah laku etika ketua didapati berkecenderungan rnenerangkan varians tingkah laku etika subordinat secara negatif. Hasil kajian juga menunjukkan pendedahan subjek etika yang diperolehi subordinat semasa belajar dun dalam perkhidmatan secara langsung berpotensi mempengaruhi tingkah laku etika subordinat. Kajian juga menunjukkan pendedahan subjek etika secara formal masih diperlukan kerana ia berkorelasi secara positif dengun tingkah laku etika subordinat.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arlow, P., & Ulrich, T. A. (1980). Business ethics, social responsibility and business students: An empirical comparison of Clark's Study. Akron Business and Economic Review, 11(3), 17-23. IJMS 11 (1), 217-233 (2004) 231

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New Jersey: Prantice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Baumhart, R. C. (1961), How ethical are businessmen?. Harvard Business Review, 39(4), 6-24.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Bowie, N. E. (1983). Ethical theory and business, 2nd. (ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 1-45.

Brenner, S. N., & Molander, E. A. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing?. Harvard Business Review, 55(1), 57-71.

Browning, J. M., & Zabriskie, N. B. (1983). How etical are industrial buyers?. Industrial Marketing Management, 12, 219-224. Deputy IGP: Cheating most prevalent crime. (1995, June 27). Business Time, 1.

Dolecheck, M., & Dolecheck, C. (1987). Business ethics. A comparison of attitude of managers in Hong Kong and The United States. Hong Kong Managers, 1, 28-43.

DuBrin, A.J. (1994). Contemporary applied management: Skill for managers, (4th ed.). Illinois, USA: Irwin.

Elm, D. R., & Nichols, M. L. (1993). An investigation of the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 817-833.

Enderle, G. (1987). Some perpectives of managerial ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 657-663.

Guy, M. E. (1990). Ethical decision making in everyday work situations. New York: Quorum Books.

Hair, Jr, J. FE, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4 ed.) : London: Prentice Hall Internatioanl, Inc..

Hansen, R. 5. (1992). A multidimensional scale for measuring business ethics: A purification and refinement. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 523-534.

Haas, R. D. (1994). Ethics — a global business challenge. Vital Speeches of The Day, 60 (16), 506.

Hitt, W. D. (1990). Ethics and leadership: Putting theory into practice. Columbus: Bettelle Press,

Johnson, P., (1992). Business ethics is an inside job. The Journal of Management Development (UK), 11(4), 44-48.

Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403 Kouzes, ]. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1992). Ethical leaders: An Eesay about being in love. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 479-484,

Lieberson, S., & O'Connor, J. F. (1972). Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. American 232 UMS 1! (1), 217-233 (2004) Aw npa'wnn' su" MMM

Downloads

Published

05-06-2004

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2004.11.1.13 OpenAlex W168530542