Efficiency of Local Governments in Malaysia and Its Correlates

Authors

  • Fatimah Wati Ibrahim Faculty of Economics Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd. Zaini Abd. Karim Faculty of Economics Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2004.11.1.4

Abstract

The local government as one of the levels of government, plays a crucial role in providing public goods and services that are specific to the localities. However, the performance of local governments has been subjected to various criticisms, based on the increasing number of complaints from the public regarding provision of public goods and the poor services rendered to the locals, suggesting the inefficiency of our local governments. This article investigates this issue by analysing whether local governments in Malaysia use an efficient level of resources to provide their services. To achieve the objective, we estimate cost efficiency using the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)approach. The efficiency scores were then regressed against factors that are likely to influence the local government's performance. The results indicate that the local governments in Malaysia are not fully efficient in using their inputs. The results also indicate that the variables that influence the local government's efficiency the most are level of technology usage, average income of the population, type of local government and location of the local government.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. L. & Seiford, L. M. (1993). The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In H. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell & 5. Schmidt, (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications. Oxford University Press.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A, & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.

Borger, B. D. & Kerstens, K. (1996). Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FOH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 145-170.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

Coelli, T. J. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (Computer) program. CEPA Working Papers, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Australia.

Deller, S. C. (1992). Production efficiency in local government: A parametric approach. Public Finance, 47(1), 32-44.

Eeckuat, P. V., Tulkens, H. & Jamar, M. A, (1993), Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities, in the measurement of productive efficiency: IJMS 11 (1). 57-70 (2004) G9 techniques and applications, H. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell & S, Scmidt, (Eds.). Oxford University Press.

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A general), 120, 253-81.

Ferrier, G. & Lovell, K. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking; Econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 229-245.

Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K. & Schmidt, S. (1993). The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications. Oxford University Press.

Kalirajan, K. P., & Tse, Y. K. (1989). Technical efficiency measures for the Malaysian food manufacturing industry. The Developing Economic, XXVUI-2, 174-184.

Kalirajan, K. (1990), On measuring economic efficiency. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5(1), 75-86.

Karim, M. Z. A. (2001). Comparative bank efficiency across select ASEAN countries. Asean Economic Bulletin, 18(3), 289-304. 70 MS 11 (1), 57-70 (2004)

Downloads

Published

05-06-2004

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
26 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2004.11.1.4 OpenAlex W1538134097