A Bibliometric Review of Research on Gamification in Marketing: Reflections for Moving Forward
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2023.30.2.4Keywords:
bibliometric, gamification, marketing, consumer behaviour, PRISMA, VOSviewerAbstract
Gamification has become increasingly popular among businesses, institutions and consumers, especially since the emergence of
Covid-19 pandemic. It has been widely used to promote positive changes in user behaviour, improve companies’ digital presence
and provide immersive and engaging brand experiences. Though bibliometric studies on gamification have been conducted previously, information on citations and networking analysis emphasises marketing and consumer behaviour remains scarce. Thus, the purpose of this bibliometric study is to describe how gamification is structured and how it has evolved over time. To achieve this, we utilise citation analysis and co-word analysis to visually uncover the intellectual, conceptual and social network structures in gamification research. A total of 558 articles published between 2011 and 2021 were extracted from the Dimension.ai database through the PRISMA review process. The results reveal positive growth in gamification research between 2011 and 2021. The United States was the most productive and most cited country and the most productive and influential institution was Tampere University in Finland, which houses Juho Hamari, the most influential and most cited author. Additionally, the results reveal recent trends in gamification research including those related to value, brand and attitude as well as emerging trends including artificial intelligence. The results also reveal collaborations through co-authorship among authors, institutions and countries. Together, they depict the intellectual landscape of gamification as related to marketing and consumer behaviour. This is beneficial for both inexperienced and experienced scholars, practitioners, funding agencies and policymakers.
Downloads
References
Ab. Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., & Hashim, U. R. (2018). The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in polytechnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(41). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0123-0
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators and research quality : An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S11192-014-1329-0
Azzouz Boudadi, N., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2020). Effect of gamification on students’ motivation and learning achievement in second language acquisition within higher education: A literature review 2011-2019. The EuroCALL Review, 28(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2020.12974
Bhatti, A., & Rehman, S. U. R. (2019). Perceived benefits and perceived risks effect on online shopping behavior with the mediating role of consumer. International Journal of Management Studies, 26(1), 33–54.
Chans, G. M., & Portuguez Castro, M. (2021). Gamification as a strategy to increase motivation and engagement in higher education chemistry students. Computers, 10(10), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100132
Dal Sasso, T., Mocci, A., Lanza, M., & Mastrodicasa, E. (2017). How to gamify software engineering. SANER 2017-24th IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1109/ SANER.2017.7884627
Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. Proceedings of CHI 2011, Vancouver. http://gamification-research.org/chi2011/papers
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). Research constituents, intellectual structure, and collaboration patterns: An analytical retrospective. Journal of International Marketing, 29(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211004234
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pattnaik, D., & Lim, W. M. (2021). A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: Insights from psychology & marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 834–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21472
Edwards, E. A., Lumsden, J., Rivas, C., Steed, L., Edwards, L. A., Thiyagarajan, A., Sohanpal, R., Caton, H., Griffiths, C. J., Munafò, M. R., Taylor, S., & Walton, R. T. (2016). Gamification for health promotion: Systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. BMJ Open, 6(10), e012447. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012447
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-015-1645-Z/TABLES/9
Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JBUSRES.2014.06.010 Garcia da Luz, V., Gueiber, E., Matos, S., Borges, H., Santos Júnior, G., & Lopes, R. (2021). A systematic mapping on machine learning algorithms and gamification applied to education. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2021), 2, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010498103530361
González Alcaide, G., & Gorraiz, J. I. (2018). Assessment of researchers through bibliometric indicators: The area of information and library science in Spain as a case study (2001–2015). Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3(April), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00015
Hamari, J. (2015). Why do people buy virtual goods? Attitude toward virtual good purchases versus game enjoyment. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.01.007
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? — A literature review of empirical studies on gamification Juho. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January(6–9), 3025–3034.
Harwood, T., & Garry, T. (2015). An investigation into gamification as a customer engagement experience environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6–7), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JSM-01-2015-0045
Hu, C., Song, M., & Guo, F. (2019). Intellectual structure of market orientation: A citation/co-citation analysis. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 37(6), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2018-0325/FULL/XML
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12525-015-0212-z
Klemke, R., Kravcik, M., & Bohuschke, F. (2014). Energy-efficient and safe driving using a situation-aware gamification approach in logistics. In A. De Gloria (Ed.), Games and learning alliance (Eds, pp. 3–15). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12157-4
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013
Kumar, S., Sureka, R., Lim, W. M., Kumar Mangla, S., & Goyal, N. (2021). What do we know about business strategy and environmental research? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3454–3469. https://doi.org/10.1002/ BSE.2813
Langfeldt, L., Benner, M., Sivertsen, G., Kristiansen, E. H., Aksnes, D. W., Borlaug, S. B., Hansen, H. F., Kallerud, E., & Pelkonen, A. (2015). Excellence and growth dynamics: A comparative study of the Matthew effect. Science and Public Policy, 42(5), 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu083
Lu, H. P., & Ho, H. C. (2020). Exploring the impact of gamification on users’ engagement for sustainable development: A case study in brand applications. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104169
Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C. A., Coronado, F., & Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: A country analysis. Scientometrics 2016 108:2, 108(2), 559–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-016-1984-4
Mitchell, R., Schuster, L., & Jin, H. S. (2020). Gamification and the impact of extrinsic motivation on needs satisfaction: Making work fun? Journal of Business Research, 106, 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2018.11.022
Molina-Collado, A., Salgado-Sequeiros, J., Gómez-Rico, M., Aranda García, E., & De Maeyer, P. (2021). Key themes in consumer financial services research from 2000 to 2020: A bibliometric and science mapping analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(7), 1446–1478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-01-2021-0043/FULL/XML
Nobre, H., & Ferreira, A. (2017). Gamification as a platform for brand co-creation experiences. Journal of Brand Management, 24(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0055-3
Nousias, S., Tselios, C., Bitzas, D., Amaxilatis, D., Montesa, J., Lalos, A. S., Moustakas, K., & Chatzigiannakis, I. (2019). Exploiting gamification to improve eco-driving behaviour: The GamECAR approach. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 343, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENTCS.2019.04.013
Pandya, A., & Lodha, P. (2021). Social connectedness, excessive screen time during Covid-19 and mental health: A review of current evidence. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3(July), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.684137
Platonova, V., & Bērziša, S. (2018). Gamification in software development projects. Information Technology and Management Science, 20(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/ itms-2017-0010
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Ribeiro, M. I. B., Fernandes, A. J. G., & Lopes, I. M. (2020). Digital marketing: A bibliometric analysis based on the scopus database scientific publications. Digital Marketing Strategies and Models for Competitive Business, 52–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2963-8.CH003
Sardi, L., Idri, A., & Fernández-Alemán, J. L. (2017). A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbi.2017.05.011
Scully, C., & Lodge, H. (2005). Impact factors and their significance; overrated or misused? British Dental Journal, 198(7), 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812185
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.506
Shahid, M., Wajid, A., Haq, K. U., Saleem, I., & Shujja, A. H. (2019). A review of gamification for learning programming fundamental. 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing, ICIC 2019, November. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICIC48496.2019.8966685
Shankar, V., Kleijnen, M., Ramanathan, S., Rizley, R., Holland, S., & Morrissey, S. (2016). Mobile shopper marketing: Key issues, current insights, and future research avenues. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. INTMAR.2016.03.002
Steinberger, F., Proppe, P., Schroeter, R., & Alt, F. (2016). CoastMaster: An ambient speedometer to gamify safe driving. AutomotiveUI 2016-8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Proceedings, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005412
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. CHB.2018.05.028
Terlutter, R., & Capella, M. L. (2013). The gamification of advertising: Analysis and research directions of in-game advertising, advergames, and advertising in social network games. Journal of Advertising, 42(2–3), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913 367.2013.774610
Tobon, S., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & García-Madariaga, J. (2020). Gamification and online consumer decisions: Is the game over? Decision Support Systems, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dss.2019.113167
Trinidad, M., Ruiz, M., & Calderon, A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of gamification research. IEEE Access, 9, 46505–46544. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063986
Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric methods: Pitfalls and possibilities. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 97(5), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x
Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. (2003). Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities : An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 33–45.
Wolf, T., Weiger, W. H., & Hammerschmidt, M. (2020). Experiences that matter? The motivational experiences and business outcomes of gamified services. Journal of Business Research, 106(January 2019), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2018.12.058
Xi, N., & Hamari, J. (2019). Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. IJINFOMGT.2018.12.002
Xu, Y., Chen, Z., Peng, M. Y. P., & Anser, M. K. (2020). Enhancing consumer online purchase intention through gamification in China: Perspective of cognitive evaluation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(November), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.581200
Yaminfirooz, M., & Ardali, F. R. (2018). Identifying the factors affecting papers’ citability in the field of medicine: An evidence-based approach using 200 highly and lowly-cited papers. Acta Informatica Medica, 26(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.5455/ aim.2018.26.10-14
Yang, Y., Asaad, Y., & Dwivedi, Y. (2017). Examining the impact of gamification on intention of engagement and brand attitude in the marketing context. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2017.03.066
Youngblood, M., & Lahti, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the interdisciplinary field of cultural evolution. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0175-8
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Management Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
