Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity: The Role of Digital Technology and Knowledge Integration Ability in Facilitating Creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2023.30.1.1Keywords:
Motivation, creativity, technology, knowledge integration, communication technologyAbstract
Creativity is a psychological phenomenon mainly affected by the motivation of employees. Nonetheless conflicting results can be
found in the literature for the link between intrinsic motivationcreativity relationship. The purpose of this research is to reinvestigate
this inconsistent relationship. We took a technological perspective to determine whether technology had an answer to this question. We conducted a laboratory experiment with 119 newly hired bankers of the same batch in four different training sessions to generate
creative ideas to solve business problems. Here, intrinsic motivation and digital-technology-use were both manipulated, independently. For field study, data was collected from 467 employees and their respective 41 supervisors working at a software house in Pakistan. Using lab and field data in two studies, we analysed data with Mplus for random coefficient models. We also performed a satorra-bentlerdifference test, using the log-likelihood method with scaling correction factor. Drawing on the motivation-opportunity-ability framework for intrinsic motivation-creativity relationship, we found that knowledge integration ability enhances the potential of employees to generate creative ideas. Based on a lab experiment and a field study, we found that creativity is contingent upon the technological opportunity provided to employees directly and indirectly by affecting their ability to integrate knowledge. Our research suggests that providing employees with relevant technological tools and ensuring utilisation of these technologies will fuel higher levels of employee creativity. Technological initiatives will help struggling economies to boost their creative potential. This research has made a significant contribution by bringing together creativity and digital technology literature.
Downloads
References
Adeel, A., Pengcheng, Z., Saleem, F., Ali, R., & Batool, S. (2019). Conflicts and creative idea endorsement: Do subordinates’ political skills and implementation instrumentality matter? International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(5), 637-656. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2019-0033
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: Sage Publications.
Al Yami, M., Ajmal, M. M., & Balasubramanian, S. (2021). Does size matter? The effects of public sector organizational size’ on knowledge management processes and operational efficiency. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2020-0123
Amabile, T., & Mueller, J. (2007). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. Handbook of organizational creativity, 33-64. Cambridge University Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167. ISBN:0-89232-748-0
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Hachette UK.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950.
Anderson, M. H. (2008). Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers’ information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 51-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.459
Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and Techniques (pp. 243-277). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Armour, P. G. (2001). The business of software: Matching process to types of teams. Communications of the ACM, 44(7), 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/379300.379326
Axelson, M., & Richtnér, A. (2017). Organizational interfaces for knowledge integration in product development collaborations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12239
Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018761
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/13085-
Basaglia, S., Caporarello, L., Magni, M., & Pennarola, F. (2010). IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 542-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2010.04.
Bhatti, S. H., Vorobyev, D., Zakariya, R., & Christofi, M. (2021). Social capital, knowledge sharing, work meaningfulness and creativity: Evidence from the Pakistani pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0065
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285240
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
Bonnardel, N., & Zenasni, F. (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in design: An enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017868
Chen, X., Wei, S., & Rice, R. E. (2020). Integrating the bright and dark sides of communication visibility for knowledge management and creativity: The moderating role of regulatory focus. Computers in Human Behavior, volume:111-106421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106421
Choi, G. Y., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2020). Discovering hidden digital producers: Understanding motivation and creativity in social media production. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(3), 318. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000240
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627. https://doi.org/. 01567-
Dewett, T. (2003). Understanding the relationship between information technology and creativity in organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419. 2003.9651410
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.
Eisenberger, R., & Aselage, J. (2009). Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.543
El Ouirdi, M., El Ouirdi, A., Segers, J., & Pais, I. (2016). Technology adoption in employee recruitment: The case of social media in Central and Eastern Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.043
Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17(4), 470-483. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1060.0193
Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443-475. https://doi.org/10.2189/ asqu.52.3.443
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071865
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 998-1022. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0604
George, J. M. (2007). 9 Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559814
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687
Glynn, M. A. (1994). Effects of work task cues and play task cues on information processing, judgment, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014391
Hackman, J. R., Pearce, J. L., & Wolfe, J. C. (1978). Effects of changes in job characteristics on work attitudes and behaviors: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21(3), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90055-
Hirudayaraj, M., & Matić, J. (2021). Leveraging human resource development practice to enhance organizational creativity: A multilevel conceptual model. Human Resource Development Review, 20(2), 172-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484321992476
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400504
Huber, G. P. (2000). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. In Knowledge, groupware and the Internet (pp. 221-254). Routledge.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Välikangas, L. (2020). Advanced technology and end-time in organizations: A doomsday for collaborative creativity? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(4), 566-584. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0040
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020). Leadership, creativity and innovation: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943 2X.2019.1661837
Lee, M. R., & Chen, T. T. (2015). Digital creativity: Research themes and framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.
Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2021). Cultivating employee creativity through strategic internal communication: The role of leadership, symmetry, and feedback seeking behaviors. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pubrev.2020.101998
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Bayes and multiple imputation. Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). 200-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119013563.ch
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_
Ma, X., Bie, Z., Li, C., Gu, C., Li, Q., Tan, Y.,...
Fan, C. (2021). The effect of intrinsic motivation and environmental cues on social creativity. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1874423
MacCormick, J. S., Dery, K., & Kolb, D. G. (2012). Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and employee engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 41(3), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.03.
Mastenbroek, N., Jaarsma, A., Scherpbier, A., van Beukelen, P., & Demerouti, E. (2014). The role of personal resources in explaining well-being and performance: A study among young veterinary professionals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 190-202. https://doi.org/.1080/1359432X.2012.728040
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Ohly, S., Kase, R., & Škerlavaj, M. (2010). Networks for generating and for validating ideas: The social side of creativity. Innovation, 12(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.41
Oldham, G. R., & Da Silva, N. (2015). The impact of digital technology on the generation and implementation of creative ideas in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.041
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2006.20785503
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925236
Rehman, H. M., Yong, H. N. A., & Choong, Y. O. (2021). Impact of management practices on organisational innovation in the digital age: A study of the manufacturing industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Management Studies, 28(2), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2021.28.2.
Reinholt, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Why a central network position isn’t enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1277-1297. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0007
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15(3), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995170
Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107308906
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest: The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x
Tiwana, A. (2008). Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.666
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
Wheeler, S., Waite, S., & Bromfield, C. (2002). Promoting creative thinking through the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00247.x
Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Huang, S., & Yuan, Q. (2021). Does enterprise social media usage make the employee more productive? A meta-analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101578
Zalesny, M. D., & Ford, J. K. (1990). Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(2), 205-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90037-A
Zhang, X.-a., Liao, H., Li, N., & Colbert, A. E. (2020). Playing it safe for my family: Exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 63(6), 1923-1950. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0680
Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413. https://doi.org/2003-00755-
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069410
Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Management Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.












