A Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) Procedure for Developing Strategies to Enhance Students’ Satisfaction of University Hostels

Authors

  • Anath Rau Krishnan Labuan Faculty of International Finance Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
  • Maznah Mat Kasim School of Quantitative Sciences Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Engku Muhammad Nazri Engku Abu Bakar School of Quantitative Sciences Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2015.22.2.3

Keywords:

Better-informed decisions, hostel satisfaction, interactive hostel attributes, multiple attribute decision-making, Sugeno measure

Abstract

This paper offers a new, hybrid multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) procedure which can be employed to quantitatively develop the optimal strategies for inflating students’ satisfaction of university hostels. The procedure uses: the systematic random stratified sampling approach for data collection purpose as students dwelling in hostels are ‘naturally’ grouped by block and gender, factor analysis to extract a large set of hostel attributes into independent factors, the Sugeno measure for characterizing the type of interaction shared by the hostel attributes within each extracted factor, the Delphi method for obtaining a well-agreed importance ranking on the extracted factors and finally, a non-linear fuzzy prioritization (NLFP) method for determining the weights of the independent hostel factors. The feasibility of the proposed procedure is illustrated by conducting a real evaluation involving Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) hostels. The proposed procedure has the ability to identify the actual factors influencing students’ satisfaction along with the weights of the factors and the type of interaction shared by the attributes within each of these factors and thus enable the management of a university to make better-informed decisions pertaining to the strategies.
 
Keywords: Better-informed decisions, hostel satisfaction, interactive hostel attributes, multiple attribute decision-making, Sugeno measure.
 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adewunmi, Y., Omirin, M., Famuyiwa, F., & Farinloye, O. (2011). Post-occupancy evaluation of postgraduate hostel facilities, http://ijms.uum.edu.my/ Facilities, 29 (3/4), 149–168.

Akdag, H., Kalaycı, T., Karagöz, S., Zülfikar, H., & Giz, D. (2014). The evaluation of hospital service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Applied Soft Computing, 23, 239–248.

Amole, D. (2005). Coping strategies for living in student residential facilities in Nigeria. Environment and Behaviour, 37(2), 201–219.

Amole, D. (2009). Residential satisfaction in students’ housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 76–85.

Angilella, S., Greco, S., Lamantia, F., & Matarazzo, B. (2004). Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 734–744.

Beliakov, G., & James, S. (2011). Citation-based journal ranks: The use of fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 167(1), 101–119.

Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

De Araujo, P., & Murray, J. (2010). Estimating the effects of dormitory living on students’ performance. Economics Bulletin, 30(1), 866–879.

Grabisch, M. (1996). Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision-making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69(3), 279–298.

Gürbüz, T., Alptekin, S. E., & Alptekin, G. I. (2012). A hybrid MCDM methodology for ERP selection problem with interacting criteria. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 206–214.

Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Mohamadghasemi, A. (2011). A fuzzy AHP-DEA approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3346–3352.

Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Mokhtarian, M. N. (2011). A new fuzzy MCDM approach based on centroid of fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5226–5230.

Hartman, A. (1981). Reaching consensus using the Delphi technique. Educational Leadership, 38(6), 495–497.

Hassan, A. S., Al Kodmany, K., & Aarab, Y. (2014). Examination of student housing preferences, their similarities and differences. Facilities, 32(11/12), 709–722. IJMS 22 (2), 33–51 (2015)

Hassanain, M. A. (2008). On the performance evaluation of sustainable student housing facilities. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(3), 212–225.

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.

Hill, K. Q., & Fowles, J. (1975). The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique Technological Forecasting and Social http://ijms.uum.edu.my/ Change, 7(2), 170–192.

Hu, Y. C., & Chen, H. (2010). Choquet integral-based hierarchical networks for evaluating customer service perceptions on fast food stores. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7880–7887.

Ilangkumaran, M., Karthikeyan, M., Ramachandran, T., Boopathiraja, M., & Kirubakaran, B. (2015). Risk analysis and warning rate of hot environment for foundry industry using hybrid MCDM technique. Safety Science, 72, 133–143.

Ishii, K., & Sugeno, M. (1985). A model of human evaluation process using fuzzy measure. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(1), 19–38.

Kahraman, C. (2008). MCDM methods and fuzzy sets. In C. Kahraman (Ed.), Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: Theory and applications with recent developments (1–18). New York: Springer.

Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003).Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382–394.

Khozaei, F., Ayub, N., Hassan, A. S., & Khozaei, Z. (2010). The factors predicting students’ satisfaction with university hostels, case study, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Asian Culture and History, 2(2), 148–158.

Khozaei, F., Hassan, A. S., & Khozaei, Z. (2010). Undergraduate students’ satisfaction with hostel and sense of attachment to place: Case study of Universiti Sains Malaysia. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 516–520.

Khozaei, F., Hassan, A. S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). The students’ degree of preference for residence hall facilities and amenities: Study of a developing country. African Journal of Business Management, 5(17), 7335–7341.

Lee, K. H. (2005). First course on fuzzy theory and applications. Berlin/ New York: Springer-Verlag.

Liou, J. J., Chuang, Y. C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2014). A fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement. Information Sciences, 266, 199–217. IJMS 22 (2), 33–51 (2015)

Liou, J. J., Hsu, C. C., & Chen, Y. S. (2014). Improving transportation service quality based on information fusion. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 225-239.

Mikhailov, L. (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3), 365–385.

Moos, R., & Lee, E. (1979). Comparing residence hall and independent living settings. Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 207–221.

Najib, N. U. M., Yusof, N. A., & Osman, Z. (2011). Measuring satisfaction with student housing facilities. American Journal of http://ijms.uum.edu.my/ Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4, 52–60.

Onut, S., Kara, S. S., & Isik, E. (2009). Long-term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 3887–3895.

Oppewal, H., Poria, Y., Ravenscroft, N., & Speller, G. (2005). Student preferences for university accommodation: An application of the stated preference approach. In R. G. Mira, D. Uzzell, J. E. R. Deus, & J. R. Martínez (Eds.), Housing, space and quality of life (pp. 113–124). Ashgate publishing limited.

Pasrija, V., Kumar, S., & Srivastava, P. R. (2012). Assessment of Software Quality: Choquet Integral Approach. Procedia Technology, 6, 153–162.

Rinn, A. N. (2004). Academic and social effects of living in honors residence halls. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 5, 67–79.

Sugeno, M. (1974). Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.

Sung, W. C. (2001). Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis to the healthcare management. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2(2), 11–19.

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Zhang, L., Zhou, D. Q., Zhou, P., & Chen, Q. T. (2014). Modelling policy decision of sustainable energy strategies for Nanjing city: A fuzzy integral approach. Renewable Energy, 62, 197–203.

Zimmermann, H. –J. (2001). Fuzzy set theory and its applications (4th ed.). Boston/Dordrecht/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Zimmermann, H.-J. (2000). An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 190–198.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2015

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2015.22.2.3 OpenAlex W7047742462

Most read articles by the same author(s)