Aspek Pengurusan Program Latihan dan Kesannya Terhadap Kepuasan Atlet Sekolah Sukan

Authors

  • Anuar Din Faculty of Psychology and Education Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
  • Salleh Abd Rashid School of Human Development & Technocommunication Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia
  • Mohd Isha Awang School of Education and Modern Languages Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2015.22.1.6

Keywords:

Atlet, pengurusan program latihan, jurulatih, fasa, kepuasan

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti kesan aspek Pengurusan Program Latihan terhadap kepuasan atlet sekolah sukan. Seramai 206 orang atlet dari dua buah sekolah sukan di Malaysia telah dipilih menggunakan persampelan rawak sebagai responden kajian. Kajian ini ialah satu kajian kuantitatif yang menggunakan kaedah tinjauan untuk menjawab objektif kajian. Satu set soal selidik telah digunakan dalam kajian ini berdasarkan Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ) oleh Reimer dan Chelladurai (1998) sementara bagi Pengurusan Program Latihan Jurulatih (PPLJ) oleh Anuar (2010). Analisis statistic inferens seperti ujian t, Korelasi Pearson dan Regresi Pelbagai digunakan untuk menguji lima hipotesis nol pada aras signifikan p < 0.05. Program yang digunakan untuk menganalisis data ialah program SPSS versi 20. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan (r = 0.548, p < 0.05) antara Pengurusan Program Latihan Jurulatih dengan kepuasan atlet. Selain daripada itu, aspek pengetahuan jurulatih, aspek kemudahan dan fasiliti serta aspek program latihan merupakan pengaruh Pengurusan Program Latihan jurulatih yang utama terhadap kepuasan atlet. Para jurulatih perlu merangka program latihan selaras dengan perkembangan Sains Sukan moden tanpa melupakan aspek fasiliti dan kemudahan. Teknologi moden dalam fasiliti dan kemudahan harus digunakan oleh jurulatih dan atlet dengan mengurangkan pendekatan secara tradisional.
 
Kata kunci: Atlet, pengurusan program latihan, jurulatih, fasa, kepuasan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Hair Awang, Azimi Hamzah, Jegak Uli, Asma Ahmad, & Rahmah Ismail. (2006). Program latihan kemahiran: Perbandingan kos, kebolehpasaran dan pendapatan pelatih. International Journal of Management Studies, 13(1), 212–244.

Anuar Din. (2010). Gaya kepimpinan, kepuasan kerja dan pengurusan program latihan jurulatih terhadap kepuasan atlet sekolah sukan (Tesis doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan). Sekolah Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Sosial, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Anuar Din & Dolorine Miting. (2013). Pengaruh gaya kepimpinan jurulatih terhadap kepuasan atlet di sekolah sukan Malaysia. Atikan: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 3(2), 195–209.

Bompa, T. O. (1999). Periodization: Theory and methodology of trainin. (4th ed.). Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.

Cakioglu, A. (2003). Leadership and satisfaction in soccer: Examination of congruence and players’ position (Master thesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Department of Physical Education and Sport: Middle East Technical University.

Chelladurai, P. (1984). Discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sport. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 27–41.

Chelladurai, P. (1999). Human resource management in sport and recreation. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.

Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan buku 1: Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill.

Davies, M. J., Bloom, G.A., & Salmela, J. H. (2005). Job satisfaction of accomplished male university basketball coaches: The Canadian context. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 173–192. IJMS 22 (1), 73–95 (2015)

Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (2006). The interaction of goal orientation and stage of change on exercise behavior in college students. Journal of Sport Behavior, 38, 95–126.

Frey, M., Czech, D. R., Kent, R. G., & Johnson, M. (2006). An exploration of female athletes experiences and perceptions of male and female coaches. The Sport Journal, 9, 4.

Frontiera, J. (2006). The relationship between leadership, efficacy belief, and performance among boys’ high school basketball player (Tesis master yang tidak diterbitkan). West Virginia University, USA. http://ijms.uum.edu.my/

Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Gert, B. V., Tanja, C., Filip, B., Jeroen, V., Wouter, G., & Marten, V. (2007). Influence coaches behavior on the performance of top sport student in individual and team sports. Proceedings Universiade Bangkok 2007, FISU Cenference, 24th, 238-242.

Gibbons, T., McConnel, A., Forster, T., Riewald, S. T., & Peterson, K. (2003). Reflections on success: US Olympians describe the success factors and obstacles that most influenced their Olympic development (Vol. Report phase II). Colorado Springs: United States Olympic Committee.

Greenleaf, C., Gould, D., & Dieffenbach, K. 2001. Factors influencing Olympic performance: Interviews with Atlanta and Nagano U.S. Olympians. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 154–184.

Hamidreza Saybani. (2013). Structural Equation Modelling analysis of the relationship between transformational leadership style of coaches, sport commitment, and athletes’ satisfaction among Iranian high school football players. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor.

Ithnin Mahadi. (2005, Mac 10). Jurulatih perlu ambil kira Sains Sukan. Berita Harian, hlm. 37.

Jin Ho Choi. (2006). The relationship among transformational leadership, organizational outcomes, and service quality in five major NCAA conferences ( Tesis master yang tidak diterbitkan). Texas A&M University, USA, Texas.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 608.

Mallett, C. J., & Hanrahan, S. J. (2004). Elite athletes: Why does the fire burn so brightly? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 183–200.

Martens, R. (1990). Successful coaching. Champaign, Illinois: Leisure Press. IJMS 22 (1), 73–95 (2015)

Mohd Faithal Hassan. (2006). Pengurusan kejurulatihan. Dlm. Mohd Salleh Aman (Penyt). Pengurusan Sukan: Aplikasinya di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Mohd Najib Gaffar. (2000). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Skudai, Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Mohd Salleh Aman. (2005). Asas pengurusan sukan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Young-Jun Park, DeSchriver, D., Bestmann, L., & Jon “YeanSub” Lim. (2008). Satisfaction levels of elite track and field athletes in South Korea. The Sport Journal, 02–11. http://ijms.uum.edu.my/

Reimer, H. A., & Toon, K. (2001). Leadership and satisfaction in tennis: Examination of congruence, gender and ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72 (3), 243–256.

Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1998). Development of the athlete satisfaction questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 20, 127–156.

Robbins, J. E, & Rosefeld, L. B. (2001). Athletes’ perceptions of social support provided by their head coach, assistant coach, and athletic trainer, pre-injury and during rehabilitation. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 24, 277–298.

Serpa, S., Pataco, V., & Santos, F. (1991). Leadership patterns in handball international competition. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 22 (1), 79–89.

Shaharudin Abd Aziz. (2005). Perkaitan antara matlamat dan stail kepimpinan dengan pencapaian atlet Sukma Negeri Perak di Kejohanan Sukma 2004. eWacana Penyelidikan UPSI, 13.

Wee Akina Sia Seng Lee & Shabeshan Rengasamy. (2014). Gaya kepimpinan jurulatih yang diminati atlet-atlet sekolah menengah di Malaysia berasaskan jantina. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 1(1), 65-74.

Wee Eng Hoe. (2006). Tanggungjawab jurulatih dalam pengurusan pasukan dan atlet. Dlm. Mohd Salleh Aman (Penyt.). Pengurusan Sukan: Aplikasinya di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Downloads

Published

25-06-2015

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2015): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 22, No. 1 June 2015

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2015.22.1.6