Real Estate Market Structure: Industrial Organization Perspectives

Authors

  • Muhammad Ridhuan Bos Abdullah School of Economics, Finance and Banking Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2015.22.1.5

Keywords:

Concentration, competition, market power, real estate services

Abstract

Existing studies of housing markets assume that property developers is a homogenous, perfectly competitive industry. It concentrates on advanced economies and the impacts of market conditions, regulatory constraints, production characteristics, institutional structure and land supply. Motivated by these circumstances and fewer literature on concentration studies in Malaysia we try to bridging the gap. This paper utilized 5-digit firm level industry data of the Malaysian Standard Industrial Classification (MSIC, 2008) on the average size of property developer establishments and market concentration to test the appropriateness of this paradigm. Our concentration ratio (CR4) results show Malaysian real estate services are considered as competitive market.
 
Keywords: Concentration, competition, market power, real estate services.
JEL: L1, L11, L85

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. R. B., & Suhaila, A. J. (2006). Industrial structure and concentration in Malaysian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Management Studies, 13, 83–101.

Agus, M. R. ( 1997). Historical perspective on housing development. In Mohd-Don, A. (Ed.), Housing the nation: A definitive study. Kuala Lumpur: Cagamas.

Aiginger, K., Mueller, D. C., & Weiss, C. (1998). Objectives, topics and methods in industrial organization during the nineties: Results from a survey. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 799–830.

Akintoye, A., & Skitmore, M. (1991). Profitability of UK construction contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 9, 311–325.

Andrew, P. W. S. (1952). Industrial economics as a specialized subject. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1, 72–79.

Ball, M. (2003). Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry: An international perspective. Urban Studies, 40(5-6), 897–916.

Beck, J., Scott, F., & Yelowitz, A., (2012) Concentration and market structure in local real estate markets. Real Estate Economics, 40, 422–460.

Buzzeli, M. (2001). Firm size structure in North American housebuilding: Persistent deconcentration, 1945-1998. Environment and Planning, 33, 533–550.

Curry, B., & George, K. (1983). Industrial concentration: A survey. Journal of Industrial Economics, 31, 205–256. IJMS 22 (1), 57–72 (2015)

Department of Statistics, Malaysia. (2014). Economic Census 2011: Business Services. Kuala Lumpur: Putrajaya.

Department of Statistics. (2008). Malaysian Standard Industrial Classification 2008 Ver.1. Kuala Lumpur: Putrajaya.

Ferguson, P. R., & Ferguson, G. J. (1994). Industrial economics: Issues and perspectives (2rd ed.). New York: New York University Press.

Geithman, F. E., Marvel, H. P., & Weiss, L. W. (1980). Concentration, price, and critical concentration ratios. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, 346–353. http://ijms.uum.edu.my/

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. London: Polity Press.

Healey, P., & Barret, S. (1990). Structure and agency in land and property development processes, Urban Studies, 27(1), 89–104.

Hui, E. C. M., Ooi, J. T. L., & Wong, K. (2007). Economic performance of property companies in Hong Kong. Journal of Property Research, 24(2), 139–157.

Jaafar, M., & Ali, R. (2011). A study on indigenous housing developers in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 5(16), 6891–6900.

Johnstone, M. (1984). Urban housing and housing policy in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Urban Regional Research, 8(4), 497–529.

Kay, J. A. (1990). Vertical restraints in European competition policy. European Economic Review, 34, 551–561.

Kaysen, C., & Turner, D. F. (1959). Antitrust policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Keogh, G., & D’Arcy, E., (2002). The market context of property development activity. Development & developers: Perspectives on property. London: Blackwell Publishing.

Lim, C. S. J. (1997). Housing and the environment. A planner’s perspective in housing the nation: A definitive study. Kuala Lumpur: Cagamas.

Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J., & Goddard, J. (2005). Industrial organization (2nd ed.).London: Prentice Hall.

Malpezzi, S., & Mayo, S. K. (1997). Getting housing incentives right: A case study of the effects of regulation, taxes, subsidies on housing supply in Malaysia. Land Economics, 73(3), 372–391.

Mohd Isa, Z., Tan Pek Voon., Shanti Rani, & Nasir, A. M. (2010). Housing market performance: A comparative study between Malaysia, England and Korea. 4th NAPREC Conference, INSPEN, Kuala Lumpur.

Property Market Report. (2013). Ministry of Finance. Kuala Lumpur: Putrajaya. IJMS 22 (1), 57–72 (2015)

REHDA. (2013). Challenges and changes in the industry. In Cagamas (Ed.), Housing the nation: Policies, issues and prospect. Kuala Lumpur: Cagamas.

Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance (2rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Shepherd, G. W. (1982). Causes of increased competition in the U.S. economy, 1939-1980. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 613–626. http://ijms.uum.edu.my/

Shuid, S. (2004). Low medium cost housing in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. In Asia Pacific Network for Housing Research (APNHR) Conference 2004, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong China.

Somerville, C. T. (1999). The industrial organization of housing supply: Market activity, land supply and the size of homebuilder firms. Real Estate Economics, 27(4), 669–694.

Ting, K. H. (2002). Listed property companies in Malaysia: A comparative performance analysis. In Seventh Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference 2002, Christchurch, New Zealand.

White, L. J. (1981). What has been happening to aggregate concentration in the United States. Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, 223–230.

Downloads

Published

25-06-2015

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2015.22.1.5