Rancangan Pembangunan Malaysia: Isu Tukar-Ganti (Trade-Off ) Antara Pertumbuhan Dengan Kelestarian

Authors

  • Chamhuri Siwar Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nasyrah Ahmad Damanhuri Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Sarah Aziz Abdul Ghani Aziz Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2011.18.2

Keywords:

Rancangan Malaysia Kesepuluh (RMK-10), indikator pembangunan lestari

Abstract

Rancangan Malaysia Kesepuluh (RMK-10) menyasarkan Malaysia mencapai pertumbuhan enam sehingga tujuh peratus sepanjang tempoh rancangan. Pertumbuhan yang tinggi ini akan menjadi aspirasi negara untuk menjadi sebuah negara berpendapatan tinggi menjelang tahun 2020 sejajar dengan matlamat Wawasan 2020. Walau bagaimanapun, persoalan timbul apabila, pertumbuhan negara dikaitkan dengan konsep pembangunan lestari yang berlandaskan pembangunan ekonomi yang menitikberatkan kesejahteraan sosial dan kelestarian alam sekitar. Adakah negara perlu mengejar pertumbuhan yang diukur menerusi Keluaran Dalam Negara Kasar (KDNK)? Bagaimana negara menangani isu berkaitan pembangunan lestari yang mengambil kira perkiraan terhadap alam sekitar? Dalam Model Ekonomi Baru (MEB) telah menjelaskan tiga komponen utama yang diberi penekanan; inclusiveness, negara berpendapatan tinggi dan kelestarian. Kajian ini akan menyingkap hubung kait ketiga-tiga komponen ini, menganalisis dan menjawab persoalan apakah tukar-ganti antara ketiganya yang merangkumi isu pengagihan pendapatan, kemiskinan, ketidakseimbangan pendapatan menerusi pekali gini dan isu berkaitan pembangunan lestari
 
Kata kunci: Rancangan Malaysia Kesepuluh (RMK-10), indikator pembangunan lestari.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bank Dunia. (2010). Bank Dunia (Malaysia Economic Monitor: Inclusive Growth). Thailand.

Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., & Folke, C. (1994). Paradise cost? The ecological of biodiversity. London: Earthscan.

Baumgartner, S., Becker, C., Frank, K., Muller, B., Quaas, M. F. (2008). Relating philosophy and practice of ecological economics: The role of concepts, model and case studies in interad transdiciplinary sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 67(3), 384–393.

Baumgartner, S., & Quaas, M. F. (2009). Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty. Ecological Economics, 68, 2008–2020.

Bolt, K., Matete, M., & Clemens, M. (2002). Manual for calculating adjusted net savings. Dicapai daripada Evironment Department World Bank.

Carson, R. T., Jeon, Y., & McCubbin, D. R. (1997). The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US Data. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 433–450.

Chamhuri, S. (2001). Pembangunan mampan: Strategi ‘menang-menang’ untuk pembasmian kemiskinan dan pemuliharaan alam sekitar. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Clayton, B. D., & Bass S. (2002). Sustainable development strategy. Organisation for economic co-operation and development. London: Earthscan.

Commission on Growth and Development. (2008). Commission on growth and development (Growth Report: Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive development). World Bank. IJMS 18 (Special Issue), 7–33 (2011)

Dasgupta, P. (2007). Measuring sustainable development: Theory and application. Asian Development Review, 24, 1–10.

Economic Planning Unit Malaysia. (1993). Economic planning unit Malaysia (Malaysian National Conservation Strategy: Towards sustainable development, Volume 4: Natural Resource Accounting). Kuala Lumpur.

Elliott, J. A. (Ed.), (2006). An introduction to sustainable development. Abingdon: Routledge.

Goodland, R., & Daly, H. (1996). Environmental sustainability: http://ijms.uum.edu.my Universal and non-negotiable. Ecological Applications, 6, 1002–1017.

Hasna, A. M. (2007). Dimensions of sustainability. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Development: Energy, Environment, and Health, 2, 47–57.

Holdren, J. P., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1995). The meaning of sustainability: Biogeophysical aspects. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Hueting, R. (2010). Why environmental sustainability can most probably not attained with growing production. Journals of Cleaner Production, 18, 525–530.

International Union for Conservation of Nature. (1980). International union for conservation of nature (Global change: Reducing uncertainties). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

Jabatan Statistik Malaysia. (2009). Jabatan Statistik Malaysia (Kompendium Alam Sekitar 2009). Putrajaya: Jabatan Statistik Malaysia.

Komen, M. H. C. (1997). Income and environmental R&D: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 505–515.

Lee, H. et al. (2005). On the relationship between economic growth and environmental sustainability (Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Eminent Environmental Economists Symposium, yang berlangsung di Ministerial Conference on Environment and Development ke-5 di Asia dan Pacific, 26 Mac, Seoul).

Majlis Penasihat Ekonomi Negara Malaysia. (2010). Majlis Penasihat Ekonomi Negara (Malaysia Model Ekonomi Baru: Bahagian Pertama). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan National Malaysia.

Majlis Penasihat Ekonomi Negara Malaysia, (2010). Majlis Penasihat Ekonomi Negara Malaysia (Model Ekonomi Baru untuk Malaysia, Bahagian Akhir: Langkah Dasar Strategik). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia.

Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2, 36–41. IJMS 18 (Special Issue), 7–33 (2011)

Md. Elias, H. (2006). Economic growth and sustainable development: Linkage between growth and environmental degradation in Malaysia. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Md. Elias, H., & Chamhuri, S. (2008). Linking rural poverty and environment: Governance and sustainable development policies (pp. 20–39). Bangi: Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan.

Mohd Nordin, Hassan & Ahmad Hezri, Adnan. (2010). Sustainable development indicator initiatives in Malaysia-novel approaches and viable frameworks. Retrieved from http://www.sarcs.org/ http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Moomaw, W. R., & Unruh, G. C. (1997). Are environmental kuznets curve misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 451–463.

Munasinghe, M. (1998). Is environmental degradation on inevitable consequences of economic growth: Tunneling through the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 29, 89–109.

Munasinghe, M. (2008). The sustainomics trans_diciplinary meta-framework for making development more sustainable: Application to energy issues. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4, 6–54.

Newman, L. (2005). Uncertainty, innovation, and dynamic sustainable development. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 1, 25–31.

Overton, J., & Scheyvens, R. (Eds.), (1999). Strategies for sustainable development: Experience from the Pacific. London: Zed Books.

Pierantoni, I. (2003). A few remarks on methodological aspect related to sustainable development (Mesyuarat berkenaan “Accounting Framework to Measure Sustainable Development” 14-16 May, Paris).

Pronk, J., & Mahbubul, H. (1992). Sustainable development: From concept to action. New York: United Nations Development Program.

SDC. (2008). A Brief History of Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/copyright.html.

Sneddona, C., Howarthb, R., & Norgaard, R. (2006). Sustainable a Development in a Post-Brundtland World. Journal of Development Economics, 57, 253–268.

Soubbotina, T. P. (2004). Beyond economic growth: An introduction to sustainable Developmet (2nd ed.). Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Stavins, R. N.,Wagner, A.F., & Wagner, G, (2003). Interpreting sustainability in economic term: Dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity. Economic Letters, 79, 339–343.

Unit Pengurusan Prestasi dan Pelaksanaan (PEMANDU). (2010). Unit Pengurusan Prestasi dan Pelaksanaan (PEMANDU) (Program Transformasi Kerajaan). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia. IJMS 18 (Special Issue), 7–33 (2011)

Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia. (2004). Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia (Indeks Kualiti Hidup Malaysia 2004). Putrajaya: Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia. (1999). Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia (Indeks Kualiti Hidup Malaysia 1999). Putrajaya: Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia.

Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia. (2010). Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia (Rancangan Malaysia Kesepuluh 2011–2015). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia. http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia. (2010). Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia (Malaysia Economic in Figure 2010). Putrajaya: Unit Perancang Ekonomi Malaysia.

United Nations Environment Programme. (1994). Workshop on Environemntal and Natural Resources Accounting with Particular Reference to Countries in Transition to Market Economies (Environmental Economic Series Paper 9, (2)).

United Nations. (1992). United Nations (Agenda 21). Rio De Janeiro: United Nations.

Vincent J. R. et al. (1993). Natural Resource and the Environment in Malaysa Context. Environment and Development in Resource-rich Economy: Malaysia Under the New Economic Policy. Malaysia: Harvard Institute for International Development.

Vincent, J. R. (1997). Testing for Environmental Kuznets Curve Within a Developing Country. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 417-431.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development (Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development). United Nations.

Yaguchi, Y., Sonobe, T., & Otsuka, K. (2007). Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve: A comparative study of SO2 and CO2 emissions between Japan and China. Environment and Development Economics, 12, 445–470. http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

23-06-2011

Issue

Vol. 18 (2011): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 18, Special Issue June 2011

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2011.18.2

Most read articles by the same author(s)