IT– Business Strategic Alignment in Influencing Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Jordan: Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Approach

Authors

  • Damnithan Al-Majali UUM College of Arts & Sciences Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Zulkhairi Md. Dahalin UUM College of Arts & Sciences Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2011.18.1.8

Keywords:

Strategic alignment, alignment gap, information technology, sustainable competitive advantage

Abstract

In many review articles or studies, the researchers have encouraged further exploration on the causal links between Information Technology (IT) investments and a firm’s sustainable competitive advantage. The outcomes of empirical studies have been inconclusive, which is to a certain extent due to the omission of IT-business strategic alignment. Indeed, strategic alignment has emerged as one of the most important issues facing business and IT executives all over the world. This paper reports on the empirical investigation of the success factors, which consist of leadership, structure and process, service quality, and values and beliefs, which are representative of the culture gap between IT strategy and business strategy. A questionnaire survey among 200 IT managers was carried out and 172 data sets were collected. This represented a 86% response rate. After a rigorous data screening process including outliers, normality, reliability and validity, 172 data sets were ready for structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the composite reliability, convergent validity and goodness of fit of the individual constructs and measurement models. The revised structural model demonstrates the relationships between all the four exogenous variables and IT-business strategic alignment, and all the four exogenous variables and sustainable competitive advantage. In addition, regarding the revised model there are two mediating effects of strategic alignment in the relationship between leadership, structure and process, service quality, values and beliefs, and sustainable competitive advantage.
 
Keywords: Strategic alignment, alignment gap, information technology, sustainable competitive advantage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldhmour, F. (2009). Towards understanding the relationship between information and communication technology and competitive advantage in a developing economy. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(1), 307–320. http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Amman Stock Exchange. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ase.com. jo

Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (2003). SPSS analysis without anguish. Sydney, Australia: John Wiley & Sons.

Chan, Y., & Reich, B. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 297–315.

Croteau, A., & Bergeron, F. (2001). An information technology trilogy: Business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(2), 77–99.

Chan, Y., Sabherwal, R., & Thatcher, J. (2006). Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 27–47.

De Villiers, R. (2006). Sources of sustainable competitive advantage for business operating in global market place. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pretoria: The USA.

Dong, X., Liu, Q., & Yin, D. (2008). Business performance, business strategy, and information system strategic alignment: An empirical study on Chinese firms. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 348–354.

Day, G. S. (1984). Strategic market planning: The pursuit of competitive advantage. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Grindley, K. (1992). Information systems issues facing senior executives: The culture gap. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(2), 57–62.

Galliers, R., Meriali, Y., & Spearing, L., (1994). Coping with information technology? How British executives perceive the key information systems management issues in the mid-1990s. Journal of Information Technology, 9, 233–238.

Henderson, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16. 170 IJMS 18 (1), 155–172 (2011)

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Johnson, A., & Lederer, A. (2010). CEO/CIO mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and the contribution of IS to the http://ijms.uum.edu.my organization. Information & Management, 47(3), 138–149.

Kearns, G. S., & Lederer, A. L. (2001). Strategic IT-alignment: A model for competitive advantage. Proceedings of the 22nd ICIS, 1–12, Barcelona.

Luftman, J. (2003). Measure your business-IT alignment. Optimize: Business Execution for CIOs Magazine, 26.

Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R., & Nash, E. (2006). Key issues for IT executives 2005. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(2), 81–101.

Luftman, J., & Brier, T. (1999). Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. California Management Review, 42(1), 109–122.

Masa’deh, R., & Kuk, G. (2009, August 7–11). Antecedents and intermediaries between strategic alignment and firm performance. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference of the Academy of Management Annual Meeting(AOM), Illinois, Chicago, U.S.A.

Nunnally, J. (1970). Psychometric methods. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Oana, V. (2010).Strategic alignment of ERP implementation stages: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 47(3), 158–166.

Pierce, A. C. (2002). The effect of business and information technology strategic alignment on information technology investment returns and corporate performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

Pallant. (2007). SPSS survival manual (3rd ed.). Sydney: McGraw Hill.

Pitt, L., Watson, R., & Kavan, C. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173–187.

Reich, B., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55–81.

Reich, B., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimensions of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113.

Sabherwal, R., & Chan, Y. (2001). Alignment between business and IS strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 11–33. IJMS 18 (1), 155–172 (2011) 171

Sage, A. P. (2002). Information technology. Retrieved from http://www. accessscience.com, DOI 10.1036/1097-8542.757582

Ward, J., & Griffiths, P. (1999). Strategic planning for information systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Ward, J., & Peppard, J. (1999). ‘Mind the gap’: Diagnosing the relationship between the IT organization and the rest of the http://ijms.uum.edu.my business. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(1), 29–60.

Ward, J., & Peppard, J. (2002). Strategic planning for information systems (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. 172 IJMS 18 (1), 155–172 (2011)

Downloads

Published

30-06-2011

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 18, No.1 June 2011

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2011.18.1.8 OpenAlex W7038773663