Factors Sustaining Social Enterprises from the Tawhidic Paradigm in Malaysia

Authors

  • Zarinah Hamid International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Zaliza Azan International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Suhaimi Mhd Sarif International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Yusof Ismail International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2019.4.2.4

Keywords:

sustainability, social enterprises, Tawhidic paradigm

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyze the factors that sustain social entrepreneurship theory from Tawhidic paradigm perspective. It describes the nature of the social entrepreneurship, the scope and boundaries of assessment on social entrepreneurship environments, and the assessment of internal aspects social entrepreneurship entities in order to formulate, implement, and evaluate strategies for survival and growth. This paper also develops an alternative model as a means to achieve sustainability in terms of innovation and competitive advantage for social entrepreneurship. It uses in-depth interviews with 10 participants including policymaker, subject matter experts, and founders of social enterprises in Malaysia. The finding indicates that the Tawhidic approach contributes to the theoretical and practical understanding of the factors sustaining social enterprises in Malaysia. Future research should incorporate more participants to further debate the dynamics of key components in the subject matter of the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Al-Tawhid: Its Implications for Thought and Life. The International Institute of Islamic Thought, United States of America. International Journal of Islamic Business | December 2019 | VOL 4 ISSUE 2 | Page 51-60 eISSN: 0127-662X |

Alter, S. K. (2006). Social enterprise models and their mission and money relationships. Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change, 205–232.

Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei‐Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

Boschee, J., & McClurg, J. (2003). Toward a better understanding of social entrepreneurship: Some important distinctions. Retrieved October 9, 2008.

Corner, P. D., & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(4), 635-659.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/255331

Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Innovation, 2006(11-4–06), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261721

Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship.

Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review, 36(2), 90-100.

Emerson, J., & Twersky, F. (Eds.). (1996). New social entrepreneurs: The success, challenge, and lessons of non-profit enterprise creation. The Homeless Economic Fund, the Roberts Foundation.

Fiet, James O., Richard. D. Nixon, Mahesh Gupta, and Pankaj C. Patel. (2006). "Entrepreneurial Discovery by the Working Poor" Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. Vol. 11, No. 3 255–273.

Ismail, Y., & Mhd Sarif, S. (2011). The role of Tawhidic paradigm in the transformation of management system.

Kickul, J. R., & Lyons, T. S. (2012). Measuring social impact. Understanding social entrepreneurship: The relentless pursuit of mission in an ever changing world, 176–200.

Leadbeater, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur (No. 25). Demos.

Miller, C. C., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. (1994). Strategic Planning and Firm Performance : a Synthesis of More Than Two Decades of Research. The Academy of Management, 37(6), 1649–1665. https://doi.org/10.2307/256804

Rogers, P. R., Miller, A., & Judge, W. Q. (1999). Using information-processing theory to understand planning/performance relationships in the context of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 567–577.

Sarif, S. M., & Sarwar, A. (2014). The effects of Tawhidic paradigm on social entrepreneurship education. In 2nd International conference on mangement from an Islamic Perspective (pp. 194–197).

Sarif, S. M., Sarwar, A., & Ismail, Y. (2013). Practice of Social Entrepreneurship among the Muslim Entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(11), 1463–1470. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.11.2347

Singh, A. (2016). The Process of Social Value Creation: A Multiple-Case Study on Social Entrepreneurship in India.

Thompson, J. L. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. International journal of public sector management, 15(5), 412-431.

Weerawardena, J., McDonald, R. E., & Mort, G. S. (2010). Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.004

Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of world business, 41(1), 21-35.

Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 519-532.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2019

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hamid, Z., Azan, Z., Mhd Sarif, S., & Ismail, Y. (2019). Factors Sustaining Social Enterprises from the Tawhidic Paradigm in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic Business, 4(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijib2019.4.2.4

Most read articles by the same author(s)