Determinants Influencing the demand for Life Takaful in Malaysia : A Quantitative Study on Income Level, Risk Attitude, and Income Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/gbmr2025.17.1.1Keywords:
Life Takaful, income level, risk attitude, income protection, demand factorsAbstract
Life takaful is one of the ways to secure finances for one’s family if the breadwinner dies or experiences total permanent disablement. However, the preference of Malaysians to purchase life takaful is mediocre. This study aims to investigate the determinants of demand for life takaful in Malaysia, focusing on income level, risk attitude, and income protection. This research involved a total of 196 respondents from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and data collected from questionnaire were analysed quantitatively using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) via descriptive analysis, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Correlation and Regression. The results reveal that both risk attitude and income level had significant positive influences on life takaful demand, while income protection produced a negative relationship. Notably, the strongest correlation was found between risk attitude and income level (r = 0.430, p < 0.01), while the weakest was between income level and income protection (r = 0.180, p < 0.05). Despite the uncertainty among respondents about purchasing life takaful, many believed their current coverage was adequate. The findings imply that takaful providers should target individuals with higher income and risk tolerance, while also enhancing educational outreach to improve financial literacy. The contribution of this study lies in its examination of behavioral and financial factors, specifically risk attitude and income protection as underexplored variables in the context of life takaful demand.
Downloads
References
Abduh, M., & Isma, S. N. Z. (2017). Economic and market predictors of solvency of family Takaful in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(3), 256-270.
Aliaga, M. G. (2005). Interactive statistics. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Ansari, Z. (2022), "A review of 20 years of takaful literature using a systematic method", Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 2-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-08-2021-0100
Babbie, E. R. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Burnett, J. J., & Palmer, B. A. (1984). Examining Life Insurance Ownership through Demographic and Psychographic Characteristics. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 51(3), 415-428. DOI: 10.2307/252479
Calculatornet. (n.d.). Sample Size Calculator. Retrieved from https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Day, D., Gan, B., Gendall, P., & Esslemont, D. (1991). Predicting Purchase Behaviour. Marketing Bulletin, 2, 18-30. (Article 3).
Ewing, B. T., Kruse, J. B., & Ozdemir, Ö. (2004). Disaster Losses in the Developing World: Evidence from the August 1999 Earthquake in Turkey (Discussion Paper No. 19). Turkish Economic Association.
Fischer, S. (1973). A Life Cycle Model of Life Insurance Purchases. International Economic Review, 14(1), 132-152. DOI: 10.2307/2526049
Goh, Y. Y., & Loke, Y. J. (2012). Purchase decision of life insurance policies among Malaysians. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(5), 415-420.
H. Holly Wang., & Rosenman, R. (2007). Perceived need and actual demand for health insurance among rural Chinese residents. China Economic Review, 18(4), 373-388.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2005). Marketing research: Within a changing information environment (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Halek, M., & Eisenhauer, J. G. (2001). Demography of risk aversion. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.2307/2678130
Lewis, F. D. (1989). Dependents and the demand for life insurance. American Economic Review, 79(3), 452-467.
Lockwood, L. M. (2018). Incidental bequests and the choice to self-insure late-life risks. American Economic Review, 108(9), 2513-2550. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20141651
Moneycompass. (n.d.). Insurance 2021: Allianz Malaysia sees higher net earned premiums. Retrieved from https://moneycompass.com.my/2022/06/01/insurance-2021-allianz/
Omar, O. E., & Owusu-Frimpong, N. (2007). Life insurance in Nigeria: An application of the theory of reasoned action to consumers' attitudes and purchase intention. The Service Industries Journal, 27(7), 963-976. DOI: 10.1080/02642060701570891
Pearce, P. L. (1982). The social psychology of tourist behaviour. International Series in Experimental Social Psychology (1st ed.). Academic Press.
Rachmawati, E., & Kholis, N. (2021). The impact of customer education and trust on the intention to purchase life insurance with sharia concept in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 1204-1218. Global Business Management Review: Vol. 17 Number 1 June 2025
Sherif, M., & Shaairi, N. A. (2013). Determinants of demand on family Takaful in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 4(1), 26-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17590811311314276
Stroe, M. A., & Iliescu, E. (2013). Attitudes and perception in consumer's insurance decision. Global Economic Observer, 1(2), 112-120.
Sugiyanto, E., Rahayu, R., & Hidayat, R. (2021). The role of sharia education in shaping consumer behavior in the Islamic insurance industry. International Journal of Islamic Business Ethics, 6(1), 45-58.
Tennyson, S., & Nguyen, J. (2020). The life insurance gender gap: Evidence from Ontario, Canada. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 87(2), 371-397.
Zehra Kazmi, A. R. (2016). An examination of the determinants of life insurance demand in Pakistan. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 5(10), 1-7.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Global Business Management Review (GBMR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
