Water Resource Allocation Issues in Thailand
Keywords:
industry, resource allocation, scarce resource, tourism, waterAbstract
The allocation of scarce resources has been problematic throughout modern history, particularly in the case of a resource as critical to human existence as water. Grounds for allocation include considerations of ideology, politics and equity. In conditions of increasing uncertainty regarding the supply of water resulting from global climate change and its effects, as well as continuously intensifying demand for water from industrial, agricultural, tourist and residential interests, the means and effectiveness of allocation decisions has become one of the most important decisions that governmental agencies are required to make. This issue is examined through the case study of Thailand, which is a country in a sub- tropical region receiving considerable rainfall during the monsoon season but with enormously elevated levels of demand for water in the contemporary period as the result of industrialization, population increase and the creation of a mass tourism industry. Historically, water allocation has taken place as the result of political contestation between government agencies and the provincial and national levels and private sector organizations and individuals. However, in a changing political and natural environment, new directions and approaches must be explored. This paper introduces new approaches to the issue of water allocation and highlights the changes in thinking required for future decision- making under conditions of greater unpredictability of supply and intensification of demand.
Downloads
References
Boyd, A., Ratanakul, P., & Deepudong, A. (1998). Compassion as Common Ground. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 8, 34-7.
Burkett, P. (2005). Marx’s Vision of Sustainable Human Development. Monthly Review, 57(5), available at: http://monthlyreview. org/2005/10/01/marxs-vision-of-sustainable-human- development (retrieved on 12th April 2012).
Chintraruck, A., & Walsh, J. (2013). The Allocation of Water Resources to Competing Interests: The Case of Thailand, paper presented at the SIU International Conference January 30-31st.
Daniels, P. L. (2005). Economic Systems and the Buddhist World View: the 21st Century Nexus. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(2), 245- 68.
Department of Water Resources (DWR) (2009). Strategic Plans for Water Resources Management in 25 Basins. Bangkok, DWR. In Thai.
Doner, R. F. (2009). The Politics of Uneven Development: Thailand’s Economic Growth in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.
Dore, J. (2003). The Governance of Increasing Mekong Regionalism, in Mingsarn Kaosa-ard and John Dore, eds., Social Challenges for the Mekong Region, Chiang Mai, Social Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, 405-40.
Femia, J. & Gramsci, (2005). Machiavelli and International Relations. The Political Quarterly, 73(3): 341-9.
Foster, J.B. (2012). Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature, New York, NY, Monthly Review Press, 2000.
Global Water Partnership (GWP) (2012). What Is IWRM? (available at: http://www.gwp.org/The-Challenge/What-is-IWRM/, (retrieved on 12th April 2012).
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science; 162, 1243-8.
Holling, C.S., & Meffe, G.K. (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology, 10(2): 328-37.
Lebel, L, Garden P, Imamura M. (2005). The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region. Ecology and Society, 10(2).
Marks, D. (2011). Climate Change and Thailand: Impact and Response. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 33(2), 229-258.
Pryor, F.L. (1990). A Buddhist Economic System – in Principle: Non- Attachment to Worldly Things Is Dominant but the Way of the Law Is Held Profitable. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 49(3), 339-51.
Santasombat, Y. (2011). The River of Life: Changing Ecosystems of the Mekong Region, Chiang Mai, Mekong Press.
Schlager, E., & Ostro E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249-62.
Slocomb, M. (2010). An Economic History of Cambodia in the Twentieth Century, Singapore, NUS Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1974). Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: The Competitive Economy. The Review of Economic Studies, 41, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources: 139-52.
Swe, T, & Chambers P. (2011). Cashing in across the Golden Triangle: Thailand’s Northern Border Trade with China, Laos and Myanmar, Chiang Mai, Mekong Press.
Tanuro, D. (2007). Marx and Nature. Socialist Outlook 11, available at: http://www.isg-fi.org.uk/spip.php?article433 (retrieved on 12th April 2012).
Un, K., & Hughes C. (2011). The Political Economy of ‘Good Governance’ Reform, in Caroline Hughes and Kheang Un, eds., Cambodia’s Economic Transformation, Copenhagen, NIAS Press, 199-218.
Usher, A.D. (2009).Thai Forestry: A Critical History, Chiang Mai, Silkworm Books.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.