Preventive Detention of Children Under Malaysian Laws: A Case for Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.11.2.2020.8687Keywords:
Children, preventive detention, criminal proceedingsAbstract
Preventive detention refers to the incarceration of an individual who has not yet been convicted, to prevent him from causing harm or endangering the community in some unspecified way. It can be seen as the deprivation of an individual’s liberty based on the belief that he may be a danger to others. The issue of preventive detention of children is very controversial and has attracted debate among various legal scholars. In Malaysia, provisions contained in specific statutes that aim to prevent terrorism or threats to national security have been invoked to justify the preventive detention of children. The practice and application of these statutory provisions on children have been subjected to various criticism. This paper aims to analyze current Malaysian laws pertaining to the preventive detention of children. It encompasses qualitative research of doctrinal and comparative nature. It will critically analyze legal issues in this area with reference to international standards and practices of other legal systems. The study concludes that the legal reform of the current Malaysian legal framework on this aspect is urgently needed to protect the rights and interests of children during the juvenile justice processes. Therefore, the study provides recommendations towards the improvement of the existing laws and policies on the preventive detention of children.
References
Amor, Daniel. (2002). The e-business (R) evolution: Living and working in an interconnected world. Upper Saddle River, N.J.; London: Prentice Hall PTR.
Cher, L. S. (2015). Putrajaya Snubbed International Calls to Halt POTA, Says Bar President. The Malaysian Insider. Retrieved from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com Chong Boon Pau v Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri [2004] 4 CLJ 838. Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No 10: Children’s Rights in Child Justice, CRC/C/GC/10, 25 April 2007, para. 81. Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No 10: Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice, CRC/C/GC/10, 25th April 2007, para. 85.
ECtHR, Case of McKay v the United Kingdom (App. No. 543/03), judgment 3 October 2006, at para. 34.
Gan, C. (1995). The Implementation of the Internal Security Act of Malaysia: An Analysis of the Protective Measures Available and Their Effectiveness. Current Law Journal, 1, 1–13.
Goldson, B., & Kilkelly, U. (2013). International human rights standards and child imprisonment: Potentialities and limitations. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21, 345–371.
Goldson, B., & Muncie, J. (2012). Towards a global “child-friendly” juvenile justice? International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, 40(1). 47–64.
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM). (2018). Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Annual Report 2018. Kuala Lumpur. UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (97-116)
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM). (2015). Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Annual Report, Kuala Lumpur.
Khaira, H. S. (2007). Preventive Detention: Part I Constitutional Rights and The Executive. Malayan Law Journal, 1, lxiii– lxxxi.
Khaira, H. S. (2007). Preventive Detention: Part II. Malayan Law Journal, 4, cxxxii–cxlv.
Landau, E. (2019, January 30). SUHAKAM, SUARAM call for review on laws for juvenile detention. New Strait Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com Lee Kew Sang v Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri [2005] 3 CLJ 914.
Lippke, R. L. (2014). Preventive pre-trial detention without punishment. Res Publica, 20(2), 111–127.
Loganathan, K. (2005). The shifting sands of judicial minds in relation to article 8 of the federal constitution. Current Law Journal, 5, i–ix.
Masum, A. (2010). The doctrine of judicial review: A cornerstone of good governance in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal, 6, cxiv–cxxxix.
Mccarthy, B. R. (1987). Preventive detention and pretrial in the child court custody. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15, 185–200. Mohd Faizal Harris v Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri Malaysia & Ors [2006] 1 MLJ 309.
Mousavi, S.,Yusoff, J. Z. M., Dusuki, F. N., & Rastegari, B. (2014). A critical legal analysis on the minimum age of criminal responsibility in the new Islamic punishment act of Iran. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 5, 31–50.
Naz, S., & Sabaruddin, J. S. (2016). Malaysian preventive detention laws: Old preventive detention provisions wrapped in new packages. Malaysian, JMCL, 43(2), 59–78. Noor Ashid bin Sakib v Ketua Polis Negara [2001] MLJ 393.
Pei Keng, Y. (1995). Preventive detention under ISA-unlawful for non-violent peaceful activities: The effect of the recent important federal court decision in Chor Phaik Har v. Farlim Properties Sdn. Bhd. on Statutory Interpretation. Current Law Journal, 1, cxcv. Minister of Home Affairs, Malaysia & Ors v Datuk James Wong Kim Min [1976] 1 LNS 129. UUMJLS 11(2), July 2020 (97-116) Sajad Husin Wani v Ketua Pengarah Imigresen & Satu Lagi [2008] 2 CLJ 403.
Schabas, W., & Sax, H. (2006). Article 37. Prohibition of Torture, Death Penalty, Life Imprisonment and Deprivation of Liberty. In A. Alen et al. (Eds.), A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Shair Mohamed, M. A., & Ahmad, A. S. (2013). Habeas corpus and the Malaysian courts: Strange bedfellows? The Malaysian court’s approach to issues pertaining to detention. Law Review, 357–376.
Shair Mohamed, M. A., & Ahmad, A. S. (2014). The quest for the protection of liberty and executive detention: The constitution and the constitutional remedy. Law Review, 1–21.
Sivalingam, J. (2015, May 16). Bar begins campaign to repeal anti-terror law. The Star. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com. my
Stewart, H. (2013). The right to be presumed innocent. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8(2), 407–420.
Suara Rakyat Malaysia. (2012). Pass of the Security Offences Bill (Special Measures) 2012, Will Cause More Travesty of Justice and Violations of the Rights of Malaysian Citizens for Years to Come. Retrieved from http://www.suaram.net
Thomas, T. (2012, April 21). Is the security offences bill constitutional? The Malaysian Insider. Retrieved from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com
UNICEF.(2013). The Malaysian juvenile justice system: A study of mechanisms for handling children in conflict with the law. Kuala Lumpur. Uthayakumar a/l Ponnusamy v Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri & Anor [2004] 5 CLJ 328.
Wood, S. (2014). The Operation of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 and a Comparison with the Old Internal Security Act 1948. Heralding a New Democratic Era, or Old Wine in a New Bottle? International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 10,78–83.
Zainal, F. (2019, Jan 30). SUHAKAM, SUARAM: Release Juveniles Detained Without Trial Under POCA. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-11Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
